LinuxQuestions.org
Review your favorite Linux distribution.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Non-*NIX Forums > General
User Name
Password
General This forum is for non-technical general discussion which can include both Linux and non-Linux topics. Have fun!

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 10-29-2009, 12:47 AM   #1
Dogs
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2009
Location: Houston
Distribution: Slackware 13.37 x64
Posts: 105

Rep: Reputation: 25
Is this microscope a good investment?


http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00...=cm_sw_em_r_dp

I want a good microscope, and this one, on paper, appears to be quite the bargain.

I'll need to get a few more eyepieces to expand the functionality of the 40x objective, but that's fine as its eyepieces are 30.5mm which are common, and cheap.

It has coarse and fine focus adjustments, and a mechanical stage that appears to be mechanically acceptable.

The diaphragm is of the adjustable iris type, and the illumination system uses cheap halogen bulbs, with a variable intensity (controllable, apparently, by a rotating disc similar to a volume control on a walkman)

It has the ability to accept a digital camera while maintaining functionality through the binos (though I don't know exactly how it handles light distribution when all three are in play)

From what I can tell, the condenser is a fairly typical type, and should be compatible with a darkfield condenser from amscope.

The construction overall appears to be decent, but this initial guess, in the past, has been faulty in some cases.

Anyone know what I'm talkin about? Have any experience with variscope?

My primary interests are examining the environment around me, and within me, so having non oil-immersed powers such as 800x, and 640x would be good for that. Then with the oil immersed objectives, the smaller details could be enhanced somewhat.

I've never used oil immersion before, and I'm wondering if it's possible to use oil immersion without contaminating the sample with the oil by using slide covers.

so, slide -> sample -> cover -> oil, but I'm not sure if that's how you're actually supposed to do it or not. I assume there's instructions in the manual, but I like external input as well.
 
Old 10-29-2009, 01:06 AM   #2
smeezekitty
Senior Member
 
Registered: Sep 2009
Location: Washington U.S.
Distribution: M$ Windows / Debian / Ubuntu / DSL / many others
Posts: 2,339

Rep: Reputation: 231Reputation: 231Reputation: 231
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dogs View Post
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00...=cm_sw_em_r_dp

I want a good microscope, and this one, on paper, appears to be quite the bargain.

I'll need to get a few more eyepieces to expand the functionality of the 40x objective, but that's fine as its eyepieces are 30.5mm which are common, and cheap.

It has coarse and fine focus adjustments, and a mechanical stage that appears to be mechanically acceptable.

The diaphragm is of the adjustable iris type, and the illumination system uses cheap halogen bulbs, with a variable intensity (controllable, apparently, by a rotating disc similar to a volume control on a walkman)

It has the ability to accept a digital camera while maintaining functionality through the binos (though I don't know exactly how it handles light distribution when all three are in play)

From what I can tell, the condenser is a fairly typical type, and should be compatible with a darkfield condenser from amscope.

The construction overall appears to be decent, but this initial guess, in the past, has been faulty in some cases.

Anyone know what I'm talkin about? Have any experience with variscope?

My primary interests are examining the environment around me, and within me, so having non oil-immersed powers such as 800x, and 640x would be good for that. Then with the oil immersed objectives, the smaller details could be enhanced somewhat.

I've never used oil immersion before, and I'm wondering if it's possible to use oil immersion without contaminating the sample with the oil by using slide covers.

so, slide -> sample -> cover -> oil, but I'm not sure if that's how you're actually supposed to do it or not. I assume there's instructions in the manual, but I like external input as well.
What oil?
 
Old 10-29-2009, 01:29 AM   #3
Dogs
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2009
Location: Houston
Distribution: Slackware 13.37 x64
Posts: 105

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 25
http://biology.clc.uc.edu/fankhauser..._Immersion.htm

"Immersion oil" is the only description I've found so far. I suspect there are other types of oil which may be cheaper and/or more abundant than "Immersion Oil" while maintaining the refractive index and with an observable viscosity.

In the link above, it would appear that the sample is between a cover and a slide. If that's the case, then I am most pleased, as that would allow the sample not to be contaminated with oil, while being observable through 2000x magnification.
 
Old 10-29-2009, 01:58 AM   #4
smeezekitty
Senior Member
 
Registered: Sep 2009
Location: Washington U.S.
Distribution: M$ Windows / Debian / Ubuntu / DSL / many others
Posts: 2,339

Rep: Reputation: 231Reputation: 231Reputation: 231
what are you planning to use it for? looking at a few things or doing real research?
 
Old 10-29-2009, 02:11 AM   #5
Dogs
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2009
Location: Houston
Distribution: Slackware 13.37 x64
Posts: 105

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 25
Quote:
Originally Posted by smeezekitty View Post
what are you planning to use it for? looking at a few things or doing real research?
That depends on your definition of real research..

I don't get paid for it, nor do I have a specific goal in mind, but that doesn't mean there won't be 10lbs of notes to go along with each observation. Purely for my own benefit, and maybe anyone elses that's interested, but I'd like to be as proficient with the device as possible. Discovery is the keyword, here.

Some of that comes from having good equipment, and I expect whatever microscope I get to be definable as good.

I would expect good for 300-400$.


Additionally, as my reading has indicated -

Having an oil with a refractive index > 1.4, glass covers, water with refractive index of 1.33, whatever the refractive index of the sample is, and the NA of the condenser being 1.25, should allow for some, if not good utilization of the numerical aperture, thus yielding a finer image.

Is this an accurate assessment?

Last edited by Dogs; 10-29-2009 at 02:27 AM.
 
Old 10-29-2009, 02:47 AM   #6
smeezekitty
Senior Member
 
Registered: Sep 2009
Location: Washington U.S.
Distribution: M$ Windows / Debian / Ubuntu / DSL / many others
Posts: 2,339

Rep: Reputation: 231Reputation: 231Reputation: 231
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dogs View Post
That depends on your definition of real research..

I don't get paid for it, nor do I have a specific goal in mind, but that doesn't mean there won't be 10lbs of notes to go along with each observation. Purely for my own benefit, and maybe anyone elses that's interested, but I'd like to be as proficient with the device as possible. Discovery is the keyword, here.

Some of that comes from having good equipment, and I expect whatever microscope I get to be definable as good.

I would expect good for 300-400$.
if you are willing to spend ~300$ then its a good investment IMO.
Quote:

Additionally, as my reading has indicated -

Having an oil with a refractive index > 1.4, glass covers, water with refractive index of 1.33, whatever the refractive index of the sample is, and the NA of the condenser being 1.25, should allow for some, if not good utilization of the numerical aperture, thus yielding a finer image.

Is this an accurate assessment?
i have no clue, i have used a microscope but without oil.
 
Old 10-29-2009, 06:25 AM   #7
H_TeXMeX_H
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Oct 2005
Location: $RANDOM
Distribution: slackware64
Posts: 12,928
Blog Entries: 2

Rep: Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dogs View Post
My primary interests are examining the environment around me, and within me, so having non oil-immersed powers such as 800x, and 640x would be good for that. Then with the oil immersed objectives, the smaller details could be enhanced somewhat.

I've never used oil immersion before, and I'm wondering if it's possible to use oil immersion without contaminating the sample with the oil by using slide covers.

so, slide -> sample -> cover -> oil, but I'm not sure if that's how you're actually supposed to do it or not. I assume there's instructions in the manual, but I like external input as well.
I've used oil immersion many times. Yes, it's quite possible to use a coverslip (even recommended), but I strongly recommend that you fix the coverslip to the slide first, otherwise things will move around.

See here for more tips:
http://www.olympusmicro.com/primer/a...immersion.html

As for the quality of the microscope, I trust microscopes made in Japan (Nikon, Olympus) or Germany (Zeiss) ... with others you take a gamble, IMO. But, there do exist some other companies in other countries that do make reasonable quality microscopes, but I don't remember their names.

Last edited by H_TeXMeX_H; 10-29-2009 at 06:27 AM.
 
Old 10-29-2009, 07:04 AM   #8
Hangdog42
LQ Veteran
 
Registered: Feb 2003
Location: Maryland
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 7,803
Blog Entries: 1

Rep: Reputation: 422Reputation: 422Reputation: 422Reputation: 422Reputation: 422
Quote:
I trust microscopes made in Japan (Nikon, Olympus) or Germany (Zeiss) ... with others you take a gamble, IMO.
I agree. Those are the big three in the microscope world. Arguably Zeiss have the best optics.
 
Old 10-29-2009, 12:09 PM   #9
smeezekitty
Senior Member
 
Registered: Sep 2009
Location: Washington U.S.
Distribution: M$ Windows / Debian / Ubuntu / DSL / many others
Posts: 2,339

Rep: Reputation: 231Reputation: 231Reputation: 231
Quote:
Originally Posted by customer reviews
Remarkable value. Overall fit and finish is that of a microscope costing 3x the price. Well worth it. Very pleased
it is a gamble but you have the odds in your favor that it will be just fine.
 
Old 10-29-2009, 12:30 PM   #10
Dogs
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2009
Location: Houston
Distribution: Slackware 13.37 x64
Posts: 105

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 25
I'm gunna go ahead and take that gamble. Hopefully it'll work out, otherwise I may have to return something for the first time in my life.
 
Old 10-29-2009, 12:36 PM   #11
enine
Senior Member
 
Registered: Nov 2003
Distribution: Slackʍɐɹǝ
Posts: 1,486
Blog Entries: 4

Rep: Reputation: 282Reputation: 282Reputation: 282
You could always try an older one, look at american science and surplus and see what they have there.
 
Old 10-29-2009, 01:20 PM   #12
Dogs
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2009
Location: Houston
Distribution: Slackware 13.37 x64
Posts: 105

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 25
Quote:
Originally Posted by enine View Post
You could always try an older one, look at american science and surplus and see what they have there.
Thanks for that site, man. I think I'll be doing a good bit of business with them for the supplies they offer!
 
Old 10-29-2009, 01:46 PM   #13
pixellany
LQ Veteran
 
Registered: Nov 2005
Location: Annapolis, MD
Distribution: Mint
Posts: 17,809

Rep: Reputation: 743Reputation: 743Reputation: 743Reputation: 743Reputation: 743Reputation: 743Reputation: 743
The maker (variscope) does not say on their website where they are, and whois cannot find them. This does not give me a warm feeling.

I would NEVER buy something like a microscope without being able to first see it and look thru it. YMMV
 
Old 10-29-2009, 02:09 PM   #14
enine
Senior Member
 
Registered: Nov 2003
Distribution: Slackʍɐɹǝ
Posts: 1,486
Blog Entries: 4

Rep: Reputation: 282Reputation: 282Reputation: 282
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dogs View Post
Thanks for that site, man. I think I'll be doing a good bit of business with them for the supplies they offer!
I bought stuff from them when I was still in school, graduated in 91 so that shows how long they have been around. Sometimes old stuff is better than the new if you know what to look for. ChikFilA has these science things in kids means, beaker, evaporating dish, etc so I'm starting to do little things with my kids and eventually will buy stuff from AS&S as they get older.
 
Old 10-29-2009, 04:49 PM   #15
Dogs
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2009
Location: Houston
Distribution: Slackware 13.37 x64
Posts: 105

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 25
Quote:
Originally Posted by pixellany View Post
The maker (variscope) does not say on their website where they are, and whois cannot find them. This does not give me a warm feeling.

I would NEVER buy something like a microscope without being able to first see it and look thru it. YMMV
My suspicions are that this company is rather small, and may not have too many unique customers..

and sometimes the business owners do more work than allows for their website. In some cases, the advertisement is just to provide a basic interface for customers that already know about them. Hence the off-site distribution. Perhaps the small company found some regular customers that keep them afloat, therefore the popularity may not be too outwardly focused on the rest of the world.

Don't know, but I'm going to find out.
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
I need a microscope to see Firefox Blakes7 Linux - Newbie 22 04-24-2009 10:43 PM
LXer: Damn Small Linux 4.4 RC1 under the microscope LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 05-29-2008 04:51 AM
LXer: Linux-based laptop goes under review microscope LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 12-28-2007 09:50 PM
Macbook pro good investment? acithium General 2 04-12-2007 10:18 AM
Your most valuable investment in Linux neo77777 General 5 04-01-2002 03:30 AM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Non-*NIX Forums > General

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:44 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration