GeneralThis forum is for non-technical general discussion which can include both Linux and non-Linux topics. Have fun!
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
I think it's just a question of time until FOSS becomes the standard. In the old days books weren't available for everyone. Now you can go to a library and read/borrow most books without any restrictions. It's common cultural heritage. The same will happen to software (sooner or later).
Books weren't available for everyone in the old days because many didn't know how to read & write and not many books even existed. You can go to a library and read/borrow books but I fail to see the equivalent institution as far as software is concerned. Perhaps you will go somewhere, sit down at a computer, use <some program> and then leave (without taking the program home with you)? I don't see why "free" (as in beer) would ever become "the standard", unless companies find an alternative way to make money off their programs (i.e. other by selling them). Programmers need to be payed (even various Linux kernel programmers get payed to do what they do). I don't see why free (as in freedom) or open source software would become the norm since I don't see the vast majority of the population learning how to program and actually caring about these things.
I actually meant open source only, and a library as an equivalent of a free access to a program's source code, but fair enough - the book analogy is not the best one.
Hey, even if FOSS is still around in 2050 (and I have a feeling that it probably will be ), how do you think that the FOSS of today would be seen by people in the future?
I still think the OP has an interesting question, even assuming that FOSS will never "die out".
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.