LinuxQuestions.org
Latest LQ Deal: Latest LQ Deals
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Fedora
User Name
Password
Fedora This forum is for the discussion of the Fedora Project.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 02-28-2004, 05:15 PM   #1
mickeyboy
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2002
Location: indianapolis , in
Posts: 37

Rep: Reputation: 15
Apt-get downloading


Fedora core Test1.
Apt-get upgrade , downdloaded a number of RPM packages from freshrpms.us.net/development
and put them in the /var/cache/apt/archive and they are later versions than installed .
Why can't I rpm -Uvh *.rpm those packages? Apt-get comes back with something about
"Unsigned /var/cache/apt/archive (for all the packages) what gives, Am I of the understanding
that you just can't upgrade Fedora Test1 core?

Thanks
Jim Tate
 
Old 02-28-2004, 07:12 PM   #2
Bobmeister
Member
 
Registered: May 2003
Location: Mt. Prospect, Illinois
Distribution: Fedora Core 2, SuSE 9.1 Professional
Posts: 189

Rep: Reputation: 30
The apt-get version you are using is by defualt designed to prevent unsigned packages from installing. Since NON of the test packages are signed, they will not install. However, you can tell apt-get to ignore that by editing a switch in it's configuration file. Go to /etc/apt and find the config file. You will see the "GPG Signature check+"false" commented out with probably a couple of
slash marks like this: //

Take those out and it will ignore the Signatures...then it will install the rpms....

Let me know if this works...
 
Old 02-28-2004, 07:13 PM   #3
Bobmeister
Member
 
Registered: May 2003
Location: Mt. Prospect, Illinois
Distribution: Fedora Core 2, SuSE 9.1 Professional
Posts: 189

Rep: Reputation: 30
Sorry, I didn't mean a + sign, I meant an = sign on the "=false" part
 
Old 02-28-2004, 10:20 PM   #4
mickeyboy
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2002
Location: indianapolis , in
Posts: 37

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 15
That did the trick, It sure beat using up2date.

Thanks
Jim Tate
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Difficulty in downloading dependancies using apt-get Rutnut Linux - Software 5 07-05-2005 04:34 AM
apt-get update errors since Debian released ( bad /etc/apt/sources.list ?) forgox Debian 10 06-13-2005 12:28 PM
apt-get gets downloading errors manhinli Linux - Newbie 6 05-04-2005 05:40 AM
knoppix 3.4 and no apt-setup how to fix info install apt-file + base-config maximalred Debian 0 10-16-2004 06:36 PM
rh9 xd2 apt apt-get problem fix and solution transeunt Red Hat 0 12-16-2003 10:54 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Fedora

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:27 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration