LinuxQuestions.org
Welcome to the most active Linux Forum on the web.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Fedora
User Name
Password
Fedora This forum is for the discussion of the Fedora Project.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 12-01-2020, 08:14 PM   #1
bscho
Member
 
Registered: Nov 2012
Location: London
Distribution: Mint 20, Kali, Peppermint, Ubuntu, MakuluFlash, Fedora 32, Windows 12 Lite, MakuluLinux
Posts: 821

Rep: Reputation: 28
Access denied when I try to install Zencart on hosting on my machine with httpd: Fedora 33


Access denied when I try to install Zencart.

I am hosting my site on my Fedora 33 machine with httpd with the files in var/www/html and I have put Zencart in the folder store.

The first file when I go to webhouses.co.uk/store, it should run is index.php but I get access denied. I have put info.php in the folder to check and that gets phpinfo() with no problems.

I just cannot figure it out.

I have two buttons it on webhouses.co.uk store and store2. Store goes to a Square store but I want to run the zencart store pointed to by store2.

I have chmod -R 777 the index.php but nothing seems to work always getting access denied.

Any ideas being trying for days?

I never had a problem installing zencart when I hosted on other providers.
 
Old 12-02-2020, 01:38 AM   #2
ondoho
LQ Addict
 
Registered: Dec 2013
Posts: 19,872
Blog Entries: 12

Rep: Reputation: 6053Reputation: 6053Reputation: 6053Reputation: 6053Reputation: 6053Reputation: 6053Reputation: 6053Reputation: 6053Reputation: 6053Reputation: 6053Reputation: 6053
This user has proven himself to be doing shady business online, like selling Linux distros with a Windows desktop background, calling them "Windows 12 Lite".
I recommend not helping him to set up a web server.
 
Old 12-02-2020, 07:13 AM   #3
bscho
Member
 
Registered: Nov 2012
Location: London
Distribution: Mint 20, Kali, Peppermint, Ubuntu, MakuluFlash, Fedora 32, Windows 12 Lite, MakuluLinux
Posts: 821

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 28
Quote:
Originally Posted by ondoho View Post
This user has proven himself to be doing shady business online, like selling Linux distros with a Windows desktop background, calling them "Windows 12 Lite".
I recommend not helping him to set up a web server.
If you give me your address I will take legal action against you for your libelous statements.

I have applied for the patent of windows 12 lite which is pending.

I have reported you for this and will take further action.
 
Old 12-02-2020, 08:53 AM   #4
boughtonp
Senior Member
 
Registered: Feb 2007
Location: UK
Distribution: Debian
Posts: 3,599

Rep: Reputation: 2546Reputation: 2546Reputation: 2546Reputation: 2546Reputation: 2546Reputation: 2546Reputation: 2546Reputation: 2546Reputation: 2546Reputation: 2546Reputation: 2546
Quote:
Originally Posted by ondoho View Post
This user has proven himself to be doing shady business online, like selling Linux distros with a Windows desktop background, calling them "Windows 12 Lite".
I recommend not helping him to set up a web server.
Selling a Linux distro isn't illegal, and it's up to Microsoft to defend their trademark. (If they don't care, why should we? Though trademark infringement might be fraud (IANAL) and would thus be against the LQ rules.)

However, posts like #3, #5 and responses like this are bigger reasons for why people may want to consider their interactions.

I will simply say that self-hosting an ecommerce store is asking for trouble - anyone not able to address the issues themselves should probably be looking at using an established ecommerce provider instead.


Last edited by boughtonp; 12-02-2020 at 10:04 AM.
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 12-02-2020, 09:35 AM   #5
bscho
Member
 
Registered: Nov 2012
Location: London
Distribution: Mint 20, Kali, Peppermint, Ubuntu, MakuluFlash, Fedora 32, Windows 12 Lite, MakuluLinux
Posts: 821

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 28
Will Linux Questions please give me their legal address.

The distributor of the libel is also libel as they are the publisher.

I have reported the matter but the libel has not been removed as of 15:34 GMT 2nd December.
 
Old 12-02-2020, 01:34 PM   #6
scasey
LQ Veteran
 
Registered: Feb 2013
Location: Tucson, AZ, USA
Distribution: CentOS 7.9.2009
Posts: 5,727

Rep: Reputation: 2211Reputation: 2211Reputation: 2211Reputation: 2211Reputation: 2211Reputation: 2211Reputation: 2211Reputation: 2211Reputation: 2211Reputation: 2211Reputation: 2211
Quote:
Originally Posted by boughtonp View Post
Selling a Linux distro isn't illegal, and it's up to Microsoft to defend their trademark. (If they don't care, why should we? Though trademark infringement might be fraud (IANAL) and would thus be against the LQ rules.)

However, posts like #3, #5 and responses like this are bigger reasons for why people may want to consider their interactions.

I will simply say that self-hosting an ecommerce store is asking for trouble - anyone not able to address the issues themselves should probably be looking at using an established ecommerce provider instead.

+1 to not self-hosting an ecommerce site. I point my customers to Square or PayPal...

As an aside, I don't see any liable in what's been said here...just a couple of observations about the OPs posting history and general non-responsiveness (except to threaten us). Definitely going on my ignore list.
 
Old 12-03-2020, 11:46 AM   #7
michaelk
Moderator
 
Registered: Aug 2002
Posts: 25,702

Rep: Reputation: 5896Reputation: 5896Reputation: 5896Reputation: 5896Reputation: 5896Reputation: 5896Reputation: 5896Reputation: 5896Reputation: 5896Reputation: 5896Reputation: 5896
Quote:
Originally Posted by bscho View Post
Will Linux Questions please give me their legal address.

The distributor of the libel is also libel as they are the publisher.

I have reported the matter but the libel has not been removed as of 15:34 GMT 2nd December.
Under US section 230 of the Communications Decency Act the publisher i.e. LQ is not libel for remarks made by a member as far as I know.

Whether or not your following GPL and the copyright license for the linux lite proprietary software included in the distribution is another matter in addition to the possible trademark infringement of calling their product Windows. If LQ helps you do something possibly illegal then that would be against the rules. I leave that up to Jeremy to decide.

I have not heard of Micro Soft going after any linux distribution that copies one of their desktop themes but that again is another matter.

I agree that ondoho post is their opinion and doubt that anything posted here would result in any real damage although I consider it is a personal attack which is against the LQ rules.
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Which Hosting is better Linux Hosting or Windows Hosting? merryja Linux - Newbie 4 11-28-2020 10:48 AM
httpd: Syntax error on line 210 of /etc/httpd/conf/httpd.conf: Syntax error on line 6 iswarya Linux - Newbie 1 01-25-2012 01:28 PM
Having trouble with Zencart Templates - Cold Steel - need to edit main page txt size alwayslearning Linux - Software 0 10-05-2010 03:17 PM
Starting httpd: httpd: Syntax error on line 209 of /etc/httpd/conf/httpd.conf: Syntax sethukpathi Linux - Networking 6 04-12-2008 11:26 AM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Fedora

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:19 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration