LinuxQuestions.org
Download your favorite Linux distribution at LQ ISO.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Debian
User Name
Password
Debian This forum is for the discussion of Debian Linux.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 02-06-2004, 07:47 AM   #16
Strike
Member
 
Registered: Jun 2001
Location: Houston, TX, USA
Distribution: Debian
Posts: 569

Rep: Reputation: 31

Quote:
Originally posted by everclear720
So what software can you install with apt-get? Is it the stuff in debian packages lists for stable, testing and unstable, or can I just type apt-get and install any linux software that I can think of?
Think about that second scenario for a second...
Anyway, if there's a debian package repository for something, you can install whatever is in it with apt without any problems. But the main debian package repositories are obviously the biggest ones. The unstable branch of Debian right now has over 14,000 software packages in it, for example.
 
Old 02-06-2004, 07:54 AM   #17
pe2338
Member
 
Registered: Dec 2002
Location: Bucharest,RO
Distribution: debian etch, sarge and sid
Posts: 407

Rep: Reputation: 30
Quote:
So what software can you install with apt-get? Is it the stuff in debian packages lists for stable, testing and unstable, or can I just type apt-get and install any linux software that I can think of?
I will answer with a question: want does rpm install? just rpms or any software I can think of?

the installed software must be packed as a debian package (aka deb file), but unlike rpm, it takes care of the dependencies automatically and pulls from the sources (specified in /etc/apt/sources.list) the depending packages if they fulfill all the criteria of the dependency

eg.: application xxx depends on libxxx version 3.2 or bigger and on libxxy 2.2 or bigger, so if he libxxx and libxxy are available and not installed, and have a version number that is correct- >=3.2 and >=2.2 - then they are also installed, if there is a conflict if libxxy 2.2 is installed together with libxxz, and libxxz is installed on the station, libxxy will not be installed, neiher will xxx and an error message will appear on the screen to inform you of the problem.


and don't forget there are lots of apps, and you can find almost any app you want already packaged for debian.
if you find an app that is not debianized then you can still install it through alien ( and that is simple and recommended)
 
Old 02-06-2004, 08:04 AM   #18
everclear720
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Feb 2004
Distribution: fedora
Posts: 2

Rep: Reputation: 0
Quote:
Originally posted by Strike
Think about that second scenario for a second...
So apt-get uses debian packages then. That's all I was asking (I think )
Doesn't gentoo kind of work like the second scenario because it installs from source? Waiting for days to compile kde doesn't sound like a whole lot of fun though.

If you convert and install a package with alien is there any sort of automated dependancy checking?
 
Old 02-06-2004, 09:53 AM   #19
jaa1180
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2003
Location: USA, Tennessee
Distribution: Ubuntu
Posts: 307

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 30
Quote:
Originally posted by everclear720
So apt-get uses debian packages then. That's all I was asking (I think )
Doesn't gentoo kind of work like the second scenario because it installs from source? Waiting for days to compile kde doesn't sound like a whole lot of fun though.

If you convert and install a package with alien is there any sort of automated dependency checking?
compiling from source is no fun. It has its advantages but the disadvantages far out weigh the pros. I used Gentoo for about 2 to 3 weeks... and when I went to upgrade from mozilla 1.4 to 1.6, it took more that 2 hours! I was in class when I was upgrading.... the class was over and it was still going. Sorry, on a laptop I use everyday and for school... that is just no feasible.

I have looked at the list of mirrors for debian... impressive.

What would be a pro and con about installing from a Live CD...say Morphix or Gnoppix?
 
Old 02-06-2004, 09:55 AM   #20
jaa1180
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2003
Location: USA, Tennessee
Distribution: Ubuntu
Posts: 307

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 30
Quote:
Originally posted by Strike
Think about that second scenario for a second...
Anyway, if there's a debian package repository for something, you can install whatever is in it with apt without any problems. But the main debian package repositories are obviously the biggest ones. The unstable branch of Debian right now has over 14,000 software packages in it, for example.
That is what I am talking about...14000!! That is what it needs to be... after 10 years of developing it should be a great distro. IMHO this is not true of Slackware. It is sad to see it trying to keep up with the others, but it is a minimialist install... that is the intention.
 
Old 02-06-2004, 09:58 AM   #21
jaa1180
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2003
Location: USA, Tennessee
Distribution: Ubuntu
Posts: 307

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 30
Quote:
Originally posted by pe2338
debian runs lilo by default (you know, the whole bunch of architectures supported must work first, then we get the enhencements) but you can install later grub, and, as I recall, there is no problem with the instalation of a new kernel.

I personally use lilo, is a personal thing, but i will pas on to grub in the near future..

I find it difficult (grub) to configure, that's why I didn't transited to it by now.
Reallly? I have found grub to be easier, but it is probially just what you get used to. I have been using grub and like the "perrty" splash image you can add. Plus Grub does not have to be run every time you recompile your kernel. I have also found that grub is more flexable and easier to read the config file... not a lot of commented lines... just my opinion. Does not make it right.
 
Old 02-07-2004, 08:25 PM   #22
delkian
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Sep 2003
Location: Finland
Distribution: Debian sid
Posts: 4

Rep: Reputation: 0
Quote:
Originally posted by Strike
Anyway, if there's a debian package repository for something, you can install whatever is in it with apt without any problems.
According to my experience, the unstable branch may have some broken dependencies sometimes, but other than that, yes, no problems.
 
Old 02-11-2004, 04:14 PM   #23
jaa1180
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2003
Location: USA, Tennessee
Distribution: Ubuntu
Posts: 307

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 30
I have a problem... I downloaded sarge (1-8 ISOs) and burned them... went home and put in the cd. Enter a couple of times and I get to a prompt. No problem, I will look at the install-en that I printed off. Mmmm it does not really tell you how to install debian in a step by step fasion. I have no idea what to do....
any ideas?
 
Old 02-13-2004, 03:00 AM   #24
pe2338
Member
 
Registered: Dec 2002
Location: Bucharest,RO
Distribution: debian etch, sarge and sid
Posts: 407

Rep: Reputation: 30
Quote:
Originally posted by jaa1180
Reallly? I have found grub to be easier, but it is probially just what you get used to. I have been using grub and like the "perrty" splash image you can add. Plus Grub does not have to be run every time you recompile your kernel. I have also found that grub is more flexable and easier to read the config file... not a lot of commented lines... just my opinion. Does not make it right.
There is also a splash screen for lilo, too...
I have a big debian logo....

Not having to run grub on every kernel compile is what wories me....

if the filesystem is not avialable, the system will not boot into "other" OSes...

and if u change the config file, then what is it so hard to run lilo also...
u need root to change lilo.conf/grub.conf also you need it for lilo/grub...

if, somehow, grub.conf gets corrupted or worse grub itself then i'm screwed.

This is the time when somebody calls me a bozo and corrects me....
 
Old 03-01-2004, 10:54 AM   #25
jaa1180
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2003
Location: USA, Tennessee
Distribution: Ubuntu
Posts: 307

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 30
I installed Libranet 2.8.1, not really impressed. Wondering what I need to do here.... I cannot find where you would install DHCP. What is some good places to read about to futher understand about debian.
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
differences between debian and debian-based distros dratix Debian 8 05-03-2008 11:05 AM
Debian Review - Debian was made for KDE vxc69 Debian 23 05-28-2007 07:56 AM
What's the difference between debian and other debian-based distro like knoppix? Akhran Debian 11 08-28-2005 06:07 PM
32bit Debian -> 64bit Debian movery Linux - Distributions 0 01-08-2005 06:39 AM
Progeny Debian Upgrade to Debian Unstable? mrmdls Debian 1 09-25-2003 07:57 AM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Debian

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:14 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration