DebianThis forum is for the discussion of Debian Linux.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
I've used this machine quite successfully as a headless
server. Now I want to see if I can deploy it for very simple web-enabled tasks like email, surfing, etc.
what's the best 'window-manager' for doing this? I am running debian 2.4 kernel on this old boy.
well, I've succesfully used blackbox, twm, xfce and even afterstep on such a system. I'd recommend checking those out. You can even go up to enlightenment -- but that may be pushing it.
On a side note, you can even use something like kde/gnome on such a system, it will just be "a trifle" slow
And do this in /etc/X11/icewm/preferences:
OpaqueMove=0
OpaqueResize=0
MenuMouseTracking=1
TaskBarShowCPUStatus=0 and TaskBarShowNetStatus=0 . I only set them to 0 on slow computers to save resources.
ShutdownCommand="sudo shutdown -h now"
RebootCommand="sudo shutdown -r now"
well, I've succesfully used blackbox, twm, xfce and even afterstep on such a system. I'd recommend checking those out. You can even go up to enlightenment -- but that may be pushing it.
On a side note, you can even use something like kde/gnome on such a system, it will just be "a trifle" slow
I assume that any window manager running on an actual terminal would always need xfree86 running?
I use Oroborus. It's small enough and configurable. It gives blank window manager. No menu at all, but you can use deskmenu and desklaunch (iconize). You can manage this WM to fulfill anything you want to be. But, if you want easy to use small WM, I recommend Blackbox or Fluxbox.
I assume that any window manager running on an actual terminal would always need xfree86 running?
Yes, you'll need X running for any of the window managers, unless you feel like working direct from console - at that point a 386 with 8MB of RAM may just suffice
There is also the Xserver on Ipod I don't remember the name.
edit:
ok , it is this (its primarly used for embemded device, like iPod but for specific use should be usable under linux) http://www.microwindows.org/
There is maybe some work to do but this is really a lightweight X server (less than 100k)
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.