DamnSmallLinuxThis forum is for the discussion of DamnSmallLinux.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Probably not, DSL runs off a 2.4 kernel which might run but is probably still too new although I'm not 100% on that. I'd start looking at Slackware around v5 or 6 or early Redhat versions
Ha, I didnt know that a 286 was a 16bit proc. I run DSL on a P2 266MHz with 128mb ram, and it runs somewhat slow. I couldnt even imagine using a 286 for anything...using a 486 is usually even out of the question. You are going to have to go with a really old and really small distro, and DSL is out of the question...I would imagine Vector and Puppy Linux wont work either.
No Linux distro will work on a 286; they all require memory management that only exists on 386 or higher hardware. Some years back there was a project to try to port Linux to 286es, but afaik it was abandoned due to lack of interest.
Years ago (back in the 80s) there was an OS called Xenix, based on Unix version 7 with some System III, System V, and BSD extensions. iirc, I've seen Xenix run on a 10 MHz 286 with 1 MB of RAM and a 20 MB hard disk. Text-only, of course, and no networking. If you can even find a copy anymore, there were releases from Microsoft (briefly) & (later) SCO.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.