2020 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice AwardsThis forum is for the 2020 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards.
You can now vote for your favorite projects/products of 2020. This is your chance to be heard! Voting ends on February 17th.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
File Commander, which I started using when I began using OS/2 as primary OS in 1997 as an upgrade from DesqView and Norton Commander. I use MC nearly as much.
By the way, I now rely on command line/shell and «lf». With a little bit of tweaking I have a preview of most files (pdf/text processing/plain text/images/videos) while still using my keyboard.
Feeling like an old-timer, I've got the impression I'm more able to use my keyboard than my mouse... [as I'm retired I do not allow myself to feel «productive» anymore).
This and backup manager (backup management being largely just a subset of file management) are two items where 'none' would be a good voting option to have. Most FM tasks beyond basic renaming (for which 'mv' or 'rename' are usually pretty easy with select-and-paste), especially backups and deleting obsolete backups, evolve patterns that are very well supported by shell scripts using 'cp [-au]', 'find [-type] [-mtime] etc', 'if [-e] [-nt]', 'stat' etc. After a few years, some custom compiled code will get in on the act, eg for cleaning undesirable characters from downloaded file filenames. From there on, everything is quick, easy, visible and reliable. (Assuming that you have a good infrastructure of aliases and/or shell functions for getting around your file system, which really is far quicker than MS-style point-and-grunt tools.)
This and backup manager (backup management being largely just a subset of file management) are two items where 'none' would be a good voting option to have.
Agreed! My main use for a file manager is interacting with GUI programs. Also, If I have been really lazy naming files (again, a GUI problem) then a file manager can be helpful.
They're all pretty much the same unless you're getting crazy.I got some Qterm and LXterm. They're fine. MX has Xterm and Alacritter or something I did just for the heck of it...they're fine. Cant recall what the Cinnamon used on LMDE ?
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.