LinuxQuestions.org
Review your favorite Linux distribution.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > 2016 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards
User Name
Password
2016 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards This forum is for the 2016 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards.
You can now vote for your favorite projects/products of 2016. This is your chance to be heard! Voting ends on February 7th.


Notices


View Poll Results: Browser of the Year
Brave 3 0.75%
Chrome 63 15.67%
Chromium 34 8.46%
Dillo 1 0.25%
dwb 0 0%
Epiphany 0 0%
Firefox 208 51.74%
Iceweasel 5 1.24%
Iridium 0 0%
Konqueror 3 0.75%
links/elinks 2 0.50%
Luakit 1 0.25%
lynx 1 0.25%
Midori 2 0.50%
NetRider 2 0.50%
Opera 12 2.99%
Otter Browser 0 0%
PaleMoon 18 4.48%
QupZilla 5 1.24%
rekonq 0 0%
SeaMonkey 19 4.73%
Uzbl 0 0%
Vivaldi 20 4.98%
w3m 2 0.50%
NetSurf 1 0.25%
Voters: 402. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 12-28-2016, 12:40 PM   #1
jeremy
root
 
Registered: Jun 2000
Distribution: Debian, Red Hat, Slackware, Fedora, Ubuntu
Posts: 12,461

Rep: Reputation: 3337Reputation: 3337Reputation: 3337Reputation: 3337Reputation: 3337Reputation: 3337Reputation: 3337Reputation: 3337Reputation: 3337Reputation: 3337Reputation: 3337
Browser of the Year


Which browser do you prefer when browsing LQ?

--jeremy
 
Old 12-28-2016, 12:42 PM   #2
Timothy Miller
Moderator
 
Registered: Feb 2003
Location: Arizona, USA
Distribution: Debian, Fedora & Arch mostly.
Posts: 2,544

Rep: Reputation: 693Reputation: 693Reputation: 693Reputation: 693Reputation: 693Reputation: 693
Lets be honest, due to intelligent decisions by the admins, ANY browser will work pretty well with LQ. It's other sites where a favorite emerges...
 
Old 12-28-2016, 12:52 PM   #3
273
LQ Addict
 
Registered: Dec 2011
Location: UK
Distribution: Debian Sid AMD64, Raspbian Wheezy, various VMs
Posts: 6,910

Rep: Reputation: 1999Reputation: 1999Reputation: 1999Reputation: 1999Reputation: 1999Reputation: 1999Reputation: 1999Reputation: 1999Reputation: 1999Reputation: 1999Reputation: 1999
Quote:
Originally Posted by Timothy Miller View Post
Lets be honest, due to intelligent decisions by the admins, ANY browser will work pretty well with LQ. It's other sites where a favorite emerges...
Good point -- don't mean to sound like a suck-up but I've not met a browser on which LQ renders badly.

As to Browser Of The Year -- I'm just glad I can now vote Firefox as a Debian user!
Long-live the spirit of Iceweasel and long-live the Iceweasel team but I am glad of this.
 
Old 12-28-2016, 03:02 PM   #4
rokytnji
LQ 5k Club
 
Registered: Mar 2008
Location: Waaaaay out West Texas
Distribution: AntiX 17 , ChromeOS
Posts: 5,224
Blog Entries: 20

Rep: Reputation: 2489Reputation: 2489Reputation: 2489Reputation: 2489Reputation: 2489Reputation: 2489Reputation: 2489Reputation: 2489Reputation: 2489Reputation: 2489Reputation: 2489
Like mentioned above. I come here using Dillo and Links2 from time to time.

But to be honest. I use mostly Seamonkey.
 
Old 12-28-2016, 04:08 PM   #5
stanvan
Member
 
Registered: May 2007
Distribution: Lite, Mint, Debian
Posts: 123

Rep: Reputation: 50
Opera is my usual choice these days, but I frequently use Firefox and Chrome/Chromium too.
 
Old 12-28-2016, 09:06 PM   #6
jamison20000e
Senior Member
 
Registered: Nov 2005
Location: ...uncanny valley... infinity\1975; (randomly born:) Milwaukee, WI, US( + travel,) Earth( I wish,) END BORDER$!◣◢┌∩┐ Fe26-E,e...
Distribution: any GPL that works well on my cheapest; has been KDE or CLI but open... http://goo.gl/NqgqJx &c ;-)
Posts: 3,663
Blog Entries: 2

Rep: Reputation: 1123Reputation: 1123Reputation: 1123Reputation: 1123Reputation: 1123Reputation: 1123Reputation: 1123Reputation: 1123Reputation: 1123
Chrome (Unstable) for video &c Firefox for gmail.
 
Old 12-28-2016, 10:35 PM   #7
cowlitzron
Member
 
Registered: Feb 2011
Location: Washington state
Distribution: C4C Lubuntu ReSpin 16.04, JULInux 10 (Xubuntu Trusty)
Posts: 125

Rep: Reputation: 24
I voted for SeaMonkey, because in addition to a web browser which uses Gecko, it also has an email client, a web composer, and before version 2.46, shipped with a chat client. The chat client is still available as an add-on. It has the same layout engine as Firefox and unlike Firefox, doesn't require addons to be signed by Mozilla in order to work. For those who used Netscape 4 many years ago, there are themes available which use Netscape 4 icons.

Last edited by cowlitzron; 12-30-2016 at 03:58 AM. Reason: to express preference for SeaMonkey
 
Old 12-29-2016, 03:57 AM   #8
poorChristian
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Dec 2016
Distribution: JULinux 12 (Ubuntu MATE Xenial)
Posts: 1

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Pale Moon, for the strong ability of the user to control, and it using Goanna, the best layout engine on Linux which is independent of the big corporate backed engines. Other browsers that I have used this year.

SeaMonkey is a strong all in one suite, with the option of using a skin that makes it use Netscape 4 icons.
Firefox works strong too for the most part, except it usually won't login to seen.life and no longer allow extensions that are not signed by Mozilla.
Google Chrome and Chromium, looks nice with great HTML5 support and is heavy on the resources. QupZilla (QtWebEngine) uses a Qt version of Chromium and uses a high amount of RAM. Slimjet is very useful to play games on Ubuntu Precise, on which the latest Chromium doesn't run. But, now with Adobe now supporting the latest version of NPAPI flash, Blink browsers (or an often buggy Freshplayer) are no longer needed to play most flash games. Konqueror is a very versatile app and an excellent file browser. But, QtWebKit4 hasn't been updated in over two years and Wikimapia and a few other dynamic sites won't work with it. Konqueror is on its way to drop support for QtWebKit4. Many JavaScript sites barf on KHTML. I've also used Konqueror-Trinity. It is a very good file browser, but has weak JavaScript support and displays text and input boxes over other text on Wikipedia and Conservapedia. Midori is a light weight browser, but tends to be crash prone on Ubuntu xenial and doesn't display Facebook correctly. Epiphany has a nice display, but has few extensions and configuration options. Closed source, Vivaldi is very much like what Opera used to be, but I couldn't get true fullscreen to work in flash games. I've also used Opera, works well with the Blink engine, but not like it used to be.
 
3 members found this post helpful.
Old 12-29-2016, 04:57 AM   #9
Michael Uplawski
Member
 
Registered: Dec 2015
Location: Normandy, France
Distribution: Debian buster/sid
Posts: 549
Blog Entries: 18

Rep: Reputation: 353Reputation: 353Reputation: 353Reputation: 353
w3m. Because, while other browsers just do a job, w3m has never failed me in situations when there was no other web-browser available.
 
Old 12-29-2016, 05:23 AM   #10
nodir
Member
 
Registered: May 2016
Posts: 137

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
There is also netsurf and surf.
Right now i use netsurf.
 
Old 12-29-2016, 12:12 PM   #11
jeremy
root
 
Registered: Jun 2000
Distribution: Debian, Red Hat, Slackware, Fedora, Ubuntu
Posts: 12,461

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 3337Reputation: 3337Reputation: 3337Reputation: 3337Reputation: 3337Reputation: 3337Reputation: 3337Reputation: 3337Reputation: 3337Reputation: 3337Reputation: 3337
NetSurf has been added.

--jeremy
 
Old 12-29-2016, 12:20 PM   #12
ugjka
Member
 
Registered: May 2015
Location: Latvia
Distribution: Arch, CentOS, ChakraOS
Posts: 275
Blog Entries: 5

Rep: Reputation: 214Reputation: 214Reputation: 214
Qupzilla, because it is QT
 
Old 12-29-2016, 01:32 PM   #13
teckk
Senior Member
 
Registered: Oct 2004
Distribution: FreeBSD Arch
Posts: 1,879

Rep: Reputation: 263Reputation: 263Reputation: 263
1st. Dillo with images off and the user agent set to a small device.
Code:
"Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 6.0.1; SM-G920V Build/MMB29K) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/52.0.2743.98 Mobile Safari/537.36"
Majority of web browsing. Not for everything though.

2nd. My own browsers in python using (Gtk, WebKit, Gdk) or one using (Qt, PySide) with buttons to easily turn images and scripts on/off, with a windows/firefox user agent
Code:
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.2; x86_64; rv:48.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/49.0"
A little slow, but no worse than firefox, and they only do what I want. Gives me webkit's web inspector, frames, scripts.

3rd. If those won't work then inox. (Chromium stripped)
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/inox-bin/
Blink and v8 are faster, and gives me chromium's web inspector, which I like.
But it still sends off info to google all the time, so I use it only when necessary. It is a nice browser though.

4th. I use lynx once in a while for a text copy of a page or to get all links.
Code:
lynx -dump -listonly http://somewhere.com > links.txt
5th. I have firefox installed, it works ok, but it is very slow, I don't use it anymore.

Tried Qupzilla, web inspector doesn't work. Used Midori for years but it's quite slow now and it pulls in zeitgeist. Tried netsurf, surf, elinks, links, w3m, dwb, Uzbl, Xombrero....

Haven't tried Vivaldi or Brave yet.
 
Old 01-02-2017, 07:45 PM   #14
Knightron
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jan 2011
Location: Australia
Distribution: OpenSUSE
Posts: 1,396
Blog Entries: 7

Rep: Reputation: 166Reputation: 166
Switched from Firefox to Palemoon and then to Chromium at the end of 2015. Been using Chromium since. Thinking about going back to Firefox or Palemoon because the pause download function in Chromium is superficial and the downloads window doesn't say how big a file is. That is very frustrating. I'm not voting this year. Still posting though to follow the discussion.
 
Old 01-05-2017, 03:30 AM   #15
audriusk
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2011
Location: Klaipėda, Lithuania
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 340

Rep: Reputation: 181Reputation: 181
Was a longtime user of Opera until they decided to use Chromium as a basis for their future development. At that time the Linux version wasn't available for at least a year, so I, feeling that Opera abandoned their Linux users, started using Firefox occasionally to see how it feels and eventually switched to it completely. It's not without faults, but I like it overall and also think that Mozilla currently is the most trustworthy browser vendor (at least from the major ones).

I also have Chromium installed, and even though it does feel snappier than Firefox, the attitude of its developers reeks too much of "we know better than our users" for my tastes. A good example would be disabled ability to turn off smooth scrolling in user settings, and even though it could be turned off in chrome://flags/ for now, it's very likely that this flag will be removed in the future versions completely.
 
1 members found this post helpful.
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Browser of the Year jeremy 2014 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards 117 12-03-2015 10:53 AM
Browser of the Year jeremy 2011 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards 121 03-05-2012 06:14 PM
Browser of the Year jeremy 2009 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards 150 03-19-2010 02:49 AM
Browser of the Year jeremy 2007 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards 133 05-03-2008 10:50 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > 2016 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:12 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration