LinuxQuestions.org
Visit Jeremy's Blog.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > 2010 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards
User Name
Password
2010 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards This forum is for the 2010 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards.
You can now vote for your favorite products of 2010. This is your chance to be heard! Voting ends on February 7th 8th.

Notices


View Poll Results: Audio Media Player Application of the Year
Amarok 123 28.28%
Rhythmbox 88 20.23%
XMMS 23 5.29%
XMMS2 6 1.38%
mpg123 10 2.30%
Beep Media Player 0 0%
juK 2 0.46%
Audacious 58 13.33%
Banshee 25 5.75%
Songbird 3 0.69%
Exaile 7 1.61%
Aqualung 6 1.38%
Quod Libet 4 0.92%
Sonata 2 0.46%
mpg321 3 0.69%
MPD 18 4.14%
MOC 10 2.30%
gmusicbrowser 3 0.69%
aTunes 3 0.69%
Zinf 0 0%
DeaDBeef 8 1.84%
Clementine 30 6.90%
cmus 3 0.69%
Voters: 435. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 01-27-2011, 08:12 AM   #61
gotfw
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2007
Posts: 416

Rep: Reputation: 70

Quote:
Originally Posted by jeremy View Post
We don't plan on adding any "front-ends" to the poll at this time. Thanks for the feedback.

--jeremy
Ok, thanks anyways.

However, Sonata is a front end to MPD. And it may well be argued that Rhythmbox, Quod Libet, etc. are all just different front ends to Gstreamer.... Although I guess the key difference is that, at least as far as I'm aware, you cannot play audio from the command line with just Gstreamer ;-P

The main thing is that front ends implement usability features such as libraries, play lists, tag editing, etc., and in these areas ncmpcpp really shines. And practically speaking, this is the primary thing that distinguishes many Gstreamer based players.
 
Old 01-27-2011, 07:47 PM   #62
eveningsky339
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2010
Location: Western Maine
Distribution: PCLinuxOS (LXDE)
Posts: 466

Rep: Reputation: 51
Quote:
Originally Posted by jmc1987 View Post
Rhythmbox is my vote. I haven't really used anything else. I guess I could shop around for some better options though
I've been using Rhythmbox for years without any qualms. I tried Banshee and just came right back to Rhythmbox. I'm sincerely confused as to why Ubuntu chose to use Banshee as the next default media player.
 
Old 01-27-2011, 08:32 PM   #63
Punk_Physicist
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Jan 2011
Location: US
Distribution: #! (Crunchbang), Ubuntu, LFS, Cyanogenmod (Android)
Posts: 9

Rep: Reputation: 0
Quod Libet for its customizability and use of Regex to organize music.
 
Old 01-28-2011, 07:42 AM   #64
fletcher08
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Mar 2010
Posts: 10

Rep: Reputation: 0
I have been enjoying Exaile. It works well for me and I like the way it is setup.
 
Old 01-29-2011, 09:03 AM   #65
gotfw
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2007
Posts: 416

Rep: Reputation: 70
Quote:
Originally Posted by Punk_Physicist View Post
Quod Libet for its customizability and use of Regex to organize music.
Yes, these are nice indeed. But, imho, switching to Gstreamer, while good for Quod in terms of toeing the gtk family line, made it a lesser player at it's primary task - audio playback. Am I the only one around here that listens to genres such as Trance and Classical, where seamless merging of one track to the next is part of the art of the performance and the enforce gaps of inherent to all Gstreamer based offerings a major blemish on the enjoyment of such?
 
Old 01-29-2011, 06:58 PM   #66
tacticalbread
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2011
Location: IN
Distribution: Arch x64 multilib
Posts: 79

Rep: Reputation: 13
I like RhythmBox's interface, but being unable to sort playlists really irks me. :(

My choice is Audacious. Nice and lightweight, but sometimes I do miss having a 'Library' :P
 
Old 01-29-2011, 07:11 PM   #67
dugan
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: Canada
Distribution: distro hopper
Posts: 11,242

Rep: Reputation: 5322Reputation: 5322Reputation: 5322Reputation: 5322Reputation: 5322Reputation: 5322Reputation: 5322Reputation: 5322Reputation: 5322Reputation: 5322Reputation: 5322
Quote:
Originally Posted by gotfw View Post
However, Sonata is a front end to MPD.
I've pointed this out earlier. If ncmpcpp is disqualified for being a frontend, then it makes no sense for Sonata to be on the poll. If Sonata is allowed to run, then it makes no sense for ncmpcpp to be disqualified. One is not more or less of a frontend than the other.

Last edited by dugan; 01-29-2011 at 07:14 PM.
 
Old 01-31-2011, 12:57 PM   #68
fbr
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2010
Location: University City, Mo
Distribution: Salix
Posts: 30

Rep: Reputation: 2
oh my darlin, oh my darlin, oh my d-a-r-l-i-n, c _ _ m _ _ t _ _ e (secret ballot).
 
Old 01-31-2011, 06:33 PM   #69
k4nz4k1g4w4
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Apr 2009
Location: Osaka,Japan
Distribution: CentOS
Posts: 2

Rep: Reputation: 0
what about vox (OSX)?

what about vox (OSX)?
 
Old 02-02-2011, 05:56 AM   #70
trentfox
Member
 
Registered: Jun 2008
Location: Peterborough, Ontario, Canada
Distribution: Ubuntu 16.04, Unity & Gnome-shell
Posts: 83

Rep: Reputation: 15
Rhythmbox; the one I have found to be most reliable and with the best interface. I'm sorry to see that Ubuntu will be replacing it with Banshee, which I've always had trouble with.
 
Old 02-02-2011, 09:53 AM   #71
sag47
Senior Member
 
Registered: Sep 2009
Location: Raleigh, NC
Distribution: Ubuntu, PopOS, Raspbian
Posts: 1,899
Blog Entries: 36

Rep: Reputation: 477Reputation: 477Reputation: 477Reputation: 477Reputation: 477
Amarok allows me to connect to my MySQL database and store all of my ratings of my music there and statistics. That way it can be smarter when choosing songs in random shuffle. I like that because I can easily back up the tables and move them if I change computers or reinstall.
 
Old 02-02-2011, 11:40 AM   #72
echowarpt
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Sep 2005
Posts: 11

Rep: Reputation: 0
seriously no ncmpcp++? does anyone even use the command line here?
Its by far the best MPD client out there, and the best curses music player as well.

oh, and don't agree with the FE argument -- probably almost all these players are 'frontends' to something like gstreamer or similar...and Sonata is in the list so the point is moot anyway.
Thats like saying your terminal client is a 'frontend' to your shell, so its not a separate category, or the window manager is a frontend to X11, etc, etc.

Last edited by echowarpt; 02-02-2011 at 11:45 AM.
 
Old 02-02-2011, 12:47 PM   #73
wayward4now
Member
 
Registered: Jul 2009
Distribution: Debian Sid
Posts: 73

Rep: Reputation: 8
Quote:
Originally Posted by jeremy View Post
Clementine has been added.

--jeremy
XBMC! It love it... especially the visual effects and audio server functions
 
Old 02-02-2011, 01:33 PM   #74
kevin Maher
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Aug 2010
Location: Ireland
Distribution: Ultimate Edition 2.7 32Bit
Posts: 4

Rep: Reputation: 0
Audio player

I use Decibel Audio Player. It's a simple no nonsense player that quickly organizes your files, and on restart, remembers where you left off.
 
Old 02-02-2011, 07:10 PM   #75
archaicDEBIANt
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Aug 2009
Distribution: Debian and Arch
Posts: 17

Rep: Reputation: 0
MOC.
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Audio Media Player Application of the Year jeremy 2009 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards 62 02-09-2010 09:13 AM
Audio Media Player Application of the Year jeremy 2008 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards 45 02-22-2009 09:29 AM
Video Media Player Application of the Year jeremy 2007 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards 59 04-27-2008 11:50 PM
Audio Media Player Application of the Year jeremy 2007 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards 56 02-18-2008 04:56 PM
Audio Media Player Application of the Year jeremy 2006 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards 143 08-01-2007 06:51 AM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > 2010 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:39 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration