2009 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice AwardsThis forum is for the 2009 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards.
You can now vote for your favorite products of 2009. This is your chance to be heard! Voting ends on February 9th.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Distribution: Debian /Jessie/Stretch/Sid, Linux Mint DE
Posts: 5,195
Rep:
rsync, couldn't be easier. Other "real" back-up suites are too complicated. The more complicated a back-up solution is, the more opaque the mechanism, and I am afraid I pull my hair out when I actually have to perfrom a full restore.
I use full versioned backup with a local "server" replicating my repo, currently using Mercurial for all but a couple directories. It is really easy to sync across desktop and laptop, any operating system, and maintain double-updates, even just by myself
For enterprise class backup solution in mixed MS and *nix environment Bacula is my preferred solution. Note that setting such a solution up correctly will require some investment in actually reading the manual, analysis, capacity planning, and tuning, but once you've done your due diligence and rolled to production Bacula does it's thing with minimal hassle. Role based, encryption, d2d2t, etc. Bacula offers a comprehensive solution that is truly open source that is not just a crippled "community edition" teaser calculated to be conduit to costly full featured "enterprise edition". Amanda aficionados will cite database issues with Bacula but I've never had experienced such - but then I also allocate database hardware appropriate for the task at hand. And having the sql lookup capability is a godsend on networks with more than a few systems.
Otherwise if we're talking backup for a couple systems then dump gives me all I need.
Distribution: Debian /Jessie/Stretch/Sid, Linux Mint DE
Posts: 5,195
Rep:
Gotfw, a quesion about Bacula. I did RTFM, even twice. But when I came to the bare metal restor chapter I started to doubt. To me it seemed restore was easy if you have your complete Bacula setup and infrastructure running. But what happens if you just have a tape and a new server just coming in from Dell with RAID arrays and all? Have you ever done a bare metal restore, and how did it go?
Of course, Amanda is network backup software, intended to coordinate the backup of a number of computers to a centralized backup server. Most of the items listed in the poll are not in the same class. They are intended as tools to be used in scripts, one-off backup events, or incorporated into other software. Amanda, for example, uses gnu-tar as a backup tool.
rsync is another of those basic tools that ends up getting using in lots of other scripts and backup software.
In the realm of just backing up your own user files, I might vote for rsync or one of its offshoots. But, forced to make a choice between basic tools and enterprise level network backup software, I vote for Amanda for all the reasons listed in the post quoted above.
Gotfw, a quesion about Bacula. I did RTFM, even twice. But when I came to the bare metal restor chapter I started to doubt. To me it seemed restore was easy if you have your complete Bacula setup and infrastructure running. But what happens if you just have a tape and a new server just coming in from Dell with RAID arrays and all? Have you ever done a bare metal restore, and how did it go?
jlinkels
Which is why I like amanda
Have done a couple of bare metal restore with amanda, including ones late in the evening on the central server for the entire office, when the Raid had 2 HD failures in half an hour .
So not only can you (relatively easily) do it, it's even doable when under (very) high pressure
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.