2008 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice AwardsThis forum is for the 2008 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards.
You can now vote for your favorite products of 2008. This is your chance to be heard! Voting ends February 12th.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
i think Geany should be in this category, probably most ppl use it as an advanced text editor than an IDE.
but anyway, my second choice is Gedit and i voted it.
Distribution: Fedora (workstations), CentOS (servers), Arch, Mint, Ubuntu, and a few more.
Posts: 441
Rep:
Was a hard choice to make. Gedit (+ plugins) is so awesome these days it's almost an IDE. It's superb as a programmer editor and the plugins like LaTeX, Snap Open, Rails stuff, etc. make it very efficient. Finally went with the classic however,.. Vim FTW!
as much as some admins hate emacs, I still find it userfriendly (as long as you dont care waiting a few seconds to open it).
For small files I prefer pico, which is fast and simple.
kile is fine for latex files, but just for that, and its choice of commands is confusing if you are a emacs/pico user.
I am waiting for a nice editor with decent text folding (in emacs you should remember where you oppened the {{{..., thats stoneage) as for instance with eclipse, which understands where you would like to fold.
I use Notepad++,might be only available for windows though...
Other then that I'm happy with mousepad or the regular notepad.
I use vi only to edit boot files or root files,when I can mess up my system
vi needs thinking...
i am a vim fan; and though quite sure i am going to be on winners side, its quite interesting to see that no one is talking emacs
hi, I was talking emacs! Not that I love it, but it used to do most things besides coffee...
Seriously, emacs might be slow and too big but that is not the problem.
The problem with emacs is that it does not keep up, in my opinion.
You have to find out how to highlight matching parenthesis, code folding is stone-age, etc.
vi does more, certainly, but it is an admins language and will always be. It works when everything else fails, etc, and has the full support of the most expert developers (also known as nerds).
But I will never like the command-type mode back and forth.
gvim is already much more civilized and has some nice features. For instance gvimdiff is good.
However, this eternal blinking when you go to command mode drives me nuts.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.