2007 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice AwardsThis forum is for the 2007 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards.
You can now vote for your favorite products of 2007. This is your chance to be heard! Voting ends February 21st.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
View Poll Results: Desktop Environment of the Year
I think (personally) ahead of the customisation options, KDE gets my vote because the options are many and yet my mum can use it witout getting lost.
AND that is good design!
KDE, it has the best integration among application, it has a lot of options so you can customize it a lot, it has most of the best applications and the Konqui is just so cute Well and KDE 4 is almost here which is one a whole new level.
"most of the best applications" ...well, you can run QT apps in non-KDE desktop too, and vice versa. So I don't think applications themselves are what make a desktop environment good or bad; if they're thought about at all, then only those applications that are "integrated" fully into the desktop. And I don't find many of those..panels maybe. KDE4 remains to be seen until it's officially released (no betas anymore please). At the moment I've only seen a buggy-as-what Windows-and-OSX-tracking heavy cream-and-cherry mixture, but of course I'm hoping it gets rid of the annoying crashing bugs, bad imitations of the other desktops and most of all would become lighter for the hardware.
Anyway, this time I voted for Gnome. My own experience, my own needs and so on.. XFCE is a nice one too, hopefully they keep on making it good and don't try to imitate the rest of the herd.
And then: anything that resembles Vista is to walk the plank.
I like Gnome for its two bars, get KDE on my computer as a backup and for KolourPaint (And other KDE programs). Also like XFCE however I think it needs to work on being more flexible.
KDE is a desktop environment that fits like a glove and melts in your mouth :P. I mean it: as you find more and more options and find more and more tricks and tips and abilities, it melts in your mouth.
Xfce is a Window Mananger. When ROX is included, Xfce becomes a Window and Desktop Mananger.
I don't think that it is ROX based (although I don't really know), but Xfce now has its own Xfdesktop application and is a DE in its own right. A nice one, too.
This is the pool for "Desktop Environment of the Year", NOT for Window Manager of the year...
While AfterStep, WindowMaker and FVWM-Crystal are called window managers they are actually full blown desktop environments. Each with its own window manager, desktop, panels, pager, menu system, run dialog, compositing etc.
A window manager is exactly that, a window manager and nothing else. Sawfish for example qualifies. If you run Sawfish and want a desktop or panels you have run something like xfdesktop (Xfce's desktop) or fbpanel (FluxBox's panel), AfterStep et al, have a window manager as part of what they are--desktop environments.
Regarding WindowMaker: it began as a GNUStep development environment but has since evolved into its own desktop environment.
For AfterStep screenshots look here
For WindowMaker here
For FVWM-Crystal here
While AfterStep, WindowMaker and FVWM-Crystal are called window managers they are actually full blown desktop environments. Each with its own window manager, desktop, panels, pager, menu system, run dialog, compositing etc.
The lines I quoted are from the developers themselves. The very creators of AfterStep and the others you mentioned call it a Window Manager.
I agree that it is a fine line between DE and WM, but you are against the word of the developers saying that it is a "full blown desktop environment". Just because a Window Manager offers a run dialog and a few other utilities does not qualify as a DE.
Distribution: Mandriva One 2007, openSuSE 10.2, FC6, Ubuntu 6.10
Posts: 11
Rep:
Yeah, I agree with Mega Man X. I've installed Ubuntu Gutsy which had chosen gnome as it's default desktop on my PC with PIII 800 MHz and 256mb RAM, and gnome ran so slow. so I switched to Kubuntu Gutsy and KDE ran very fast. And I still like Konqueror tabbed browsing and it's split screen feature. It very useful even for file management.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.