*BSDThis forum is for the discussion of all BSD variants.
FreeBSD, OpenBSD, NetBSD, etc.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
I recently bought a 120 gig hard drive and proceeded to install it on my freeBSD box.
Everything went fine, but when I mount the drive as a samba share on my windows box it reads that the drive's total size is 108 GB and that 99.6 GB are free (even though I haven't put anything on it yet!).
The other hard drive I share is a 40 gig that reads a total size of 34.7 GB with 30 GB free. I forget the "acutal" size of a 40 gig HD, but 34.7 sounds reasonable. I have also used about 4 GB on that drive, making the free space sound reasonable.
I'm confused. If there is any other information I can provide that would be helpful, let me know (and how to get at that information).
Anyways it is normal for your pc to think your 120 gig drive is about 110gigs. This is due to the filesystem, some of the disk is used to handle such things as backup's, and temporary storage for reorganization of the memory blocks. Windows does the same thing etc...
UFS is the default for bsd anyways we dont use smelly ext2 or ext3 because we dont want gpl contamination.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.