LXer: Linux Foundation Releases Statement Calling for National Bodies to Vote "No" on

		LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - News > Syndicated Linux News
LXer: Linux Foundation Releases Statement Calling for National Bodies to Vote "No" on

Syndicated Linux News This forum is for the discussion of Syndicated Linux News stories.

Notices

Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.

You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!

Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.

Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto | Site FAQ | Sitemap | Register Now

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.

Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.

Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.

Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.

Search this Thread

08-30-2007, 07:00 AM	#1
LXer LXer NewsBot Registered: Dec 2005 Posts: 128,432 Rep:	LXer: Linux Foundation Releases Statement Calling for National Bodies to Vote "No" on Published at LXer: I'm pleased to note that the Linux Foundation has issued a statement calling for ISO/IEC JTC1 members to vote "No with Comments" on OOXML. The decision to issue the statement follows on the heels of a rising crescendo of reports of last minute additions of individuals to National Bodies which is slanting voting results, and of a similar last minute upgrading of nine (or perhaps by now, more) nations to "P" status in ISO. Read More...

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is Off Forum Rules

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
LXer: Linux Foundation Statement on OOXML	LXer	Syndicated Linux News	1	09-06-2007 06:15 AM
LXer: FSF Releases "Last Call" Draft of GPLv3	LXer	Syndicated Linux News	0	06-02-2007 09:31 AM
LXer: Arch Linux releases "Voodoo," changes name	LXer	Syndicated Linux News	0	04-02-2007 09:31 PM
LXer: Position Statement to the Dunc-Tanc "experiment"	LXer	Syndicated Linux News	0	10-27-2006 01:03 AM
LXer: "fedora Foundation...Not the Right Answer," Declares Linux Vendor ...	LXer	Syndicated Linux News	0	04-08-2006 09:03 PM

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:40 PM.

Main Menu

(Con't)

My LQ

Write for LQ

LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.

Main Menu

Syndicate

Latest Threads

LQ News

Twitter: @linuxquestions