Syndicated Linux NewsThis forum is for the discussion of Syndicated Linux News stories.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Much has been written over the last few days about Linux Mint's meteoric rise in Distrowatch's rankings, seemingly at the expense of Ubuntu's fall. While he thinks Linux Mint's rise is deserved, Larry the Free Software Guy is not convinced these stats are a sound yardstick, and he does his best Jerry Maguire in shouting, "Show me the downloads!"
First, Distrowatch numbers are based on page visits, not downloads. Show me the downloads, and then let’s talk. Web page hits don’t tell me if people are actually downloading a particular distro and using it, or if they’re just looking at the pages for whatever reason they might. Page visits might translate into distro downloads, but they also might be visits to forums, wikis, etc., as well. So I’m not convinced this is a valid measurement.
Not only that, but consider this. People who are not hopping probably don't go to Distrowatch for the latest release of their favorite distro. IMHO Distrowatch numbers probably do indicate an increased interest in Mint. What they don't indicate is people interested in staying with Ubuntu.
I'm not defending Unity, because frankly I don't use it (KDE fan here). I'm just saying that much of the hype and hysteria I've read about Unity seems far overblown when compared to reality. And I'm somewhat in agreement with the writer above, but for my own reasons.
I threw Ubuntu onto my spare partition specifically to take a look at Unity and I honestly don't know what the fuss is all about.
I didn't like the global top menu, but you can remove that by removing a couple of packages.
I didn't like the newfangled scrollbars, but you can put them back to normal by removing a couple of packages.
I didn't like the new behaviour of alt-tab, but you can also put that back to the traditional way with a little tweaking of compiz, (and in Unity2D it still works the old way anyway).
I didn't like the 'Dashboard' thing, but you don't have to use it.
I had no problem with the dock down the left hand side (other than I would have liked it on the right), but I was a WindowMaker user for many years so it wasn't anything new to me.
My overall view was that Unity was a little buggy but nothing to shout about in either a good or bad way. I really can't see how it would be a driver for folks abandoning Ubuntu if they were previously happy with it.
And yes, distrowatch page-hits really don't mean a great deal.
P.S. In the interest of full-disclosure: I'm generally not a fan of Ubuntu, and I've never tried Mint.
Trust me, GazL, if you've been a regular Gnome 2 user, the sum total annoyances of Unity/Gnome 3 indeed is enough to make the (painful) switch to KDE 4. Bear in mind that I had shifted from KDE 4 to Gnome because I hated the bloat of KDE 4 initially.
Gnome 2 was just about the perfect balance between usability and customizability without being loaded with a ton of shiny things(tm). In Gnome 3 they took away a lot of customizability to make it shinier.
Not only that, but consider this. People who are not hopping probably don't go to Distrowatch for the latest release of their favorite distro. IMHO Distrowatch numbers probably do indicate an increased interest in Mint. What they don't indicate is people interested in staying with Ubuntu.
Additionally, I've never actually used the distrowatch website to download any distro (even in my distro-hopping days).
Additionally, I've never actually used the distrowatch website to download any distro (even in my distro-hopping days).
Really? It is quite convenient having every significant distro (and many lesser ones) indexed on a single website. When I'm looking for something new to play with I go there. By contrast, if know the name of the distro I want then I just go directly to the distro's website.
Really? It is quite convenient having every significant distro (and many lesser ones) indexed on a single website. When I'm looking for something new to play with I go there. By contrast, if know the name of the distro I want then I just go directly to the distro's website.
Or ... did you mean something else?
I always found out about new distros from threads on LQ. If something sounded interesting, I'd google the distro's name and go straight to its website.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.