SUSE / openSUSEThis Forum is for the discussion of Suse Linux.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
If your system does not meet the prereqs, for any reason, or you decide to ignore dependencies(both of which you can do) you risk massive system inconsistency, and even full system failure. It doesn't have to be that bad, it might work just fine. But with a kernel requirement, it probably means there were things added with the kernel version they mention, that old ones didn't have, which likely means, you do need it. What might happen without meeting it? Could be just slower to run, maybe missing a feature or two, or it could halt the system entirely. So certainly you can, and if you don't mind trying it out with a high percentage chance of needing to reinstall, then do try it out. But under normal circumstances, you probably wou;dn't want to risk it.
Originally posted by myfokkinnick@yahoo.i
As far as I know Suse 9.2 uses xorg. So I downloaded the Xorg drivers from ATI.
Can I just install the drivers or do I absolutely have to install a new kernal?
Regards
You need at least the 2.6.x kernel, which I believe SuSE 9.2 has. If not, you can update it before installing the drivers. You'll need to have gcc, make, and kernel-source of your current kernel installed as well for the installer program to work.
Then of course you have to run flgxrconfig.
I used the current ATI drivers on my installation of 9.2 before upgrading to 10.0, and they worked fine. I had kept the kernel up-to-date, which is the only variable I'm not certain about.
I got the ATI drivers installed somehow. At first everything got f$#ked up and I was left with just a console. I was in such a hurry I can't even remember what I did, but I eventually got into Suse, installed Quake and it works. The weird thing is, I can't run glxgears?
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.