LinuxQuestions.org
Download your favorite Linux distribution at LQ ISO.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > SUSE / openSUSE
User Name
Password
SUSE / openSUSE This Forum is for the discussion of Suse Linux.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 09-05-2005, 05:52 AM   #1
Tarekaz
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2005
Location: Aachen
Distribution: Fedora Core 4 , Suse , Xp , win98
Posts: 46

Rep: Reputation: 15
Question optimize performance , Suse 3.9


Hey guys ,
recently i downloaded the Suse 3.9 , on my p3 933Mhz ,70Gb , 192 MB RAM :s
but its running extremly tooooo slow ,
i know that this pc is not a technological breakthrough , since i got it from ebay for 99EURO ...
anyway , any on idea how to optimize performance ?

and another question , is there is any version of Devc++ for linux?
or simply another c++ compiler?

Cheers!!
 
Old 09-06-2005, 12:39 AM   #2
voxel
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2005
Location: Canada
Distribution: SuSE 9.3
Posts: 34

Rep: Reputation: 15
well the best way to speed linux up is to remove modules you don't need from the kernel... I am definitely no expert on the subject; it's next on my 'Learning Linux TO-DO' list.. hehe

but check out Chapter 9 in the Administration Guide in the SuSE Help Center, it's all about the kernel...

SuSE 9.3 also defaults to KDE... you could try logging in with Gnome, you'll probably notice a performance increase there too...
 
Old 09-07-2005, 03:22 PM   #3
mac57
Member
 
Registered: Nov 2004
Location: Texas
Distribution: openSUSE 10.3, Yoper Linux 3.0 , Arch Linux 2007.08
Posts: 253

Rep: Reputation: 30
Before you get too worried about this, you should know that SuSE is not renowned for having the speediest release out there. SuSE 9.3 is fabulous - the most functional and solid linux release I have ever used - but it is not fast. Slow is a relative term of course. To put some numbers to it, SuSE boots up from GRUB prompt to KDE desktop in about 1 1/2 minutes on my 1.4 GHz P4 machine. I have a Yoper release on the same machine that does the same thing in about the half that time. However, I tweaked and twiddled and worked on that Yoper release for months before it got it to the same level of functionality that SuSE 9.3 has almost "out of the box".

So, how slow is slow? Can you post some timings? Perhaps you are just expecting more from SuSE 9.3 than it can deliver. You may wish to look to a different release that is optimized for speed, such as the above mentioned Yoper, or perhaps even Vector Linux, which bills itself as the fastest "not from source" linux out there.
 
Old 09-11-2005, 08:01 PM   #4
Tarekaz
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2005
Location: Aachen
Distribution: Fedora Core 4 , Suse , Xp , win98
Posts: 46

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 15
thanks guys for ur answers ,
well i mean like slow !!! seriously slow ,
to boot it would take no less than 4minutes , and to shutdown around 1 minute
maybe adding a few RAM would do the trick ?

also what is really annoying is that once booted , once you click lets say on firefox it takes around 20 sec to open...

now since my interest is only in assembly programming and c++ , the speed of the OP doesnt really matter , but it was shoking to see how slow 9.3 was...

i think am gonna delete the 9.3 in a couple of days unless i figure out how to make it a bit more effective

Last edited by Tarekaz; 09-11-2005 at 08:03 PM.
 
Old 09-11-2005, 09:20 PM   #5
mac57
Member
 
Registered: Nov 2004
Location: Texas
Distribution: openSUSE 10.3, Yoper Linux 3.0 , Arch Linux 2007.08
Posts: 253

Rep: Reputation: 30
I had this experience once with SuSE 9.0. I'm going to guess that you have a bunch of USB peripherals (hard drives, scanners, printers, etc.) attached to your computer that have not yet been configured? I had a USB scanner and a USB hard drive that caused SuSE 9.0 to take more than 4 minutes to boot. When I unplugged those two, it zipped back to a more normal speed. Any chance that this might be your problem?
 
Old 09-12-2005, 09:36 AM   #6
gherikill
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2005
Posts: 56

Rep: Reputation: 15
Personally I would suggest an upgrade, Suse 3.9 is pretty old and there have been many performance realted improvements in more recent releases. I reccomend OpenSUSE
 
Old 09-12-2005, 09:54 AM   #7
mac57
Member
 
Registered: Nov 2004
Location: Texas
Distribution: openSUSE 10.3, Yoper Linux 3.0 , Arch Linux 2007.08
Posts: 253

Rep: Reputation: 30
I suspect that the author meant "9.3", not "3.9"!
 
Old 09-12-2005, 10:24 AM   #8
gherikill
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2005
Posts: 56

Rep: Reputation: 15
I was just joking
 
Old 09-12-2005, 12:38 PM   #9
Tarekaz
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2005
Location: Aachen
Distribution: Fedora Core 4 , Suse , Xp , win98
Posts: 46

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 15
heheh yeah i meant the 9.3

no i dont have anything connected to it , but i have 2 hard disks in it , could it be the problem?

well what do you think about adding 512 MB RAM , will it do the trick or is it useless?

if instead of deleting the extra applications i just blocked them from starting when Suse boots.... is it possible to block all the extra applications? coz i have 62Gb
 
Old 09-12-2005, 01:46 PM   #10
Tarekaz
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2005
Location: Aachen
Distribution: Fedora Core 4 , Suse , Xp , win98
Posts: 46

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 15
and forgot to say , one hard disk is 2,7Gb and the other 59Gb
But i think that linux divided the big one and then installed itself on the 36Gb partition...

as for loading time , i need for example more than a minute to open office!!!!

damn it is slow!!! ,
 
Old 09-12-2005, 10:18 PM   #11
duffmckagan
Senior Member
 
Registered: Feb 2005
Distribution: Cent OS 6.4
Posts: 1,163

Rep: Reputation: 49
Did the installation give any error?
Is there any specific point during the boot / shutdown that the process takes time?

Try switching to the verbose mode (usually that is done by pressing Esc Key once while the system is booting or shutting down.

Try that. See what process / processes cause the slowdown.

Moreover, what is the File system that Suse is installed on.
I have seen it work slow if installed on a Fat - 32 File System.
 
Old 09-12-2005, 11:06 PM   #12
mac57
Member
 
Registered: Nov 2004
Location: Texas
Distribution: openSUSE 10.3, Yoper Linux 3.0 , Arch Linux 2007.08
Posts: 253

Rep: Reputation: 30
Adding RAM *may* help. Your original post said that you had 192 MB of RAM. I have never run SuSE in less than 256 MB of RAM. There is no guarantee, but 256 MB is the "normal" amount for most Linux distros these days.

Another question comes to mind - how large is your swap partition? Could it be that with only 192 MB of RAM, and an insufficient amount of swap, SuSE is just churning? The general rule is that your swap partition should be at least twice as big as your total RAM. I would advise however that you have at least 512 MB of swap - I don't think more will hurt either. I generally run a 1GB or more swap partition on most machines.
 
Old 09-13-2005, 05:03 PM   #13
Tarekaz
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2005
Location: Aachen
Distribution: Fedora Core 4 , Suse , Xp , win98
Posts: 46

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 15
well no actually the installation was very smooth no errors nothing ,
i tried to boot my pc many times to see if it blocks on one certain file or register , but as it seems is that the whole process is slow.
it is a vFAT system

As long as for the PC i got it from ebay so u can imagine all the crap in it

anyway the pc is a P3 933mhz
initially 2,7 Gb and then the guy added a 60Gb memory ,
192RAM ,

now when i go to the partition information of linux(coz i have also win98) i see the following:
one partition: total size 37,745 MB Free size 35,637MB
the second partition: total size 2,436 MB Free size 1,906MB
third partition: Total S. 19,127MB Free S. 19,041MB

now well i noticed something interesting that i think should be taken into consideration , the total physical memory is 179,05 MB, and when there is absolutly no programm running the free physical memory is around 6MB!!
Disk buffer is 13,61MB


and when any programm is running the free physical memory is around 1MB , the disk buffer around 1.MB
and the disk cache around 90MB

well thats the situation , , pretty desperate ,
so what do you recommand guys? other than throwing the pc from the 5th floor?
 
Old 09-16-2005, 05:11 PM   #14
Tarekaz
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2005
Location: Aachen
Distribution: Fedora Core 4 , Suse , Xp , win98
Posts: 46

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 15
anyone?
any idea or suggestions?....

Last edited by Tarekaz; 09-20-2005 at 04:54 PM.
 
Old 09-20-2005, 04:58 PM   #15
Tarekaz
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2005
Location: Aachen
Distribution: Fedora Core 4 , Suse , Xp , win98
Posts: 46

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 15
help
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
can I optimize this kushalkoolwal Programming 5 10-21-2005 09:05 PM
please optimize this C function ewt3y Programming 10 08-12-2005 05:48 AM
Simple Performance Tests with AMD64 & Suse SML SUSE / openSUSE 3 04-05-2005 10:03 PM
SuSE 9.1 Professional - Performance mikedeatworld SUSE / openSUSE 2 10-27-2004 06:04 PM
poor performance with suse 9.0 misophist Linux - Distributions 4 11-10-2003 09:45 AM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > SUSE / openSUSE

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:08 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration