LinuxQuestions.org
Download your favorite Linux distribution at LQ ISO.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > SUSE / openSUSE
User Name
Password
SUSE / openSUSE This Forum is for the discussion of Suse Linux.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 03-14-2006, 11:00 PM   #16
spooon
Senior Member
 
Registered: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,755

Rep: Reputation: 51

The fact that you're using an SMP kernel probably means you have multiple or dual-core processors. This does not have to do with whether they are 64-bit. Some Pentium 4 processors support EM64T (64-bit), while others do not; it depends on the exact model. "uname -m" I think tells you the machine type of the kernel, but I doubt that this has to do with what your hardward actually supports. Also, "cat /proc/cpuinfo" gives you a lot of info about your processor; maybe you can decipher it.

Last edited by spooon; 03-14-2006 at 11:02 PM.
 
Old 03-15-2006, 04:23 AM   #17
Keruskerfuerst
Senior Member
 
Registered: Oct 2005
Location: Horgau, Germany
Distribution: Manjaro KDE, Win 10
Posts: 2,199

Rep: Reputation: 164Reputation: 164
I have only 64 Bit OS installed.
They are running much faster compared to the 32 Bit versions.
 
Old 05-23-2006, 03:22 PM   #18
gymnart
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2005
Distribution: SUSE 11.4
Posts: 331

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 30
rickh, Mine says, command not found.


Quote:
Originally Posted by rickh
Wanna see your processor type, kernel, ram & all that kind of stuff, and maybe a cute picture of Tux or your OS logo, as well?

Install linux_logo

Mine says:

Linux Version 2.6.15-1-amd64-k8
Compiled #2 Tue Mar 7 06:53:26 UTC 2006
One 1.99GHz AMD Athlon 64 Processor, 447M RAM
3985.09 Bogomips Total
debian

Last edited by gymnart; 05-23-2006 at 04:20 PM.
 
Old 05-23-2006, 04:21 PM   #19
gymnart
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2005
Distribution: SUSE 11.4
Posts: 331

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 30
So, how can I find out what modules my SuSE 10 system loads and uses?
I want to see if it has/uses evdev mousedev and such.
I tried "cat /proc/modules" but I get a command not found. I searched for "modules" and found a proc/modules file but it was empty.

spooon, cat /proc/cpuinfo worked nicely and stuff is listed twice it seems. Thanks!
 
Old 05-23-2006, 04:25 PM   #20
nadroj
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jan 2005
Location: Canada
Distribution: ubuntu
Posts: 2,539

Rep: Reputation: 60
'lsmod' is the command to see currently loaded modules.
did 'cat /proc/modules' give you 'command not found'? or was it something else like 'permission denied' or 'file not found'?
 
Old 05-23-2006, 04:58 PM   #21
rottie
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2003
Posts: 64

Rep: Reputation: 15
I first ran a Suse 32b on my ADM64 and later formated and installed suse 64bits.
I didn't experience a noticable speed increase.

In fact, I experience more problems with installing packets that are 32b and have 32b dependencies. I takes more tinkering.
 
Old 05-28-2006, 02:16 PM   #22
gymnart
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2005
Distribution: SUSE 11.4
Posts: 331

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 30
Thank you so much nadroj! That worked.
When I typed 'cat /proc/modules' it gave me a 'command not found'.
 
Old 06-21-2006, 10:53 AM   #23
PerfectStranger
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Dec 2005
Distribution: SuSE
Posts: 20

Rep: Reputation: 0
"uname -p" should give quick architecture type -- "uname -a" (as mentioned above) will also include that information
 
Old 06-23-2006, 06:53 AM   #24
Brian Knoblauch
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2005
Distribution: OpenSuse Tumbleweed
Posts: 288

Rep: Reputation: 39
Quote:
Originally Posted by broch
10) 64-bit OS is not 2x as fast as 32-bit. In some cases it will be several times, in other no advantage.
It *can* even be slower in some circumstances as it may require more RAM, that may lead to more paging to disk
 
Old 06-23-2006, 01:35 PM   #25
fragos
Senior Member
 
Registered: May 2004
Location: Fresno CA USA
Distribution: Ubuntu 10.10
Posts: 1,466

Rep: Reputation: 51
I've been running a 64 Bit kernel for some time but a couple of weeks ago decided to to try dual booting with a 32 Bit kernel. Both are Ubuntu 6.06. Now with a little direct experience I can make a reasonable comparison. As a user I can't discern a difference in speed although I've not tried any objective measures. Over time I got most things to work with the 64 Bit Ubuntu but still flash evaded me. I haven't yet tried the chroot jail method which should work. With the 32 Bit kernel I rapidly past the complement of software on my 64 Bit kernel. Before Ubuntu I'd been a devoted SuSE user for some time -- SuSE 10.1 drove me away. I will give SuSE credit for making 64 Bit operation in a mixed 64/32 Bit environment more transparent. As an old geek of many years, the thought of running a 32 Bit OS on a 64 Bit machine seemed almost blasphemy. I've been very focused on Linux for the desktop and have helped many make the transition to Linux. At this time, I recommend to new and experienced users Ubuntu 6.0.6 32 Bit as the OS of choice. It's much simpler for me to support users on 32 Bit Ubuntu and they can focus more on the use and not the facilitation of use. Although running dual boot 32 and 64 Bit Ubuntu, my own default boot is the 32 Bit version.

Last edited by fragos; 06-23-2006 at 08:18 PM.
 
Old 06-23-2006, 08:06 PM   #26
gbullit
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Apr 2003
Location: Sweden
Distribution: SLED RC3, Suse 10.0 LTS, Mepis 3.4.3
Posts: 16

Rep: Reputation: 0
Quote:
Originally Posted by rickh
Wanna see your processor type, kernel, ram & all that kind of stuff, and maybe a cute picture of Tux or your OS logo, as well?

Install linux_logo

Mine says:

Linux Version 2.6.15-1-amd64-k8
Compiled #2 Tue Mar 7 06:53:26 UTC 2006
One 1.99GHz AMD Athlon 64 Processor, 447M RAM
3985.09 Bogomips Total
debian
gymnart by clicking on "My Computer" I get the following information:
CPU Information
Processor (CPU): AMD Athlon(tm) 64 Processor 3500+
Speed: 2,211.50 MHz

Memory Information
Total memory (RAM): 1.98 GB
Free memory: 142.22 MB (+ 1.61 GB Caches)

Disk Information
Device
Floppy Drive auto 20.00 GB
2.2G Media swap
21G Media reiserfs 20.00 GB 16.11 GB
140G Media reiserfs 130.65 GB 117.56 GB

OS Information
OS: Linux 2.6.16.13-4-default i686
Current user: george@linux-home
System: SUSE LINUX 10.1 (i586)
KDE: 3.5.1 Level "a"

Display Info
Vendor: nVidia Corporation
Model: GeForce 6600 GT
Driver: nvidia (3D Support)
 
Old 06-24-2006, 11:23 AM   #27
gymnart
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2005
Distribution: SUSE 11.4
Posts: 331

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 30
gbullit,
I wish mine would do that.
When I do that, I don't get anything but Media:/
I'm using SuSE 10.0 and have KDE as my desktop. How's yours set up?

Last edited by gymnart; 06-24-2006 at 11:47 AM.
 
Old 06-24-2006, 11:56 AM   #28
riba43
Member
 
Registered: Feb 2005
Location: Slovenia
Distribution: suse11.0
Posts: 749

Rep: Reputation: 31
Hi

Podatki o disku
Naprava
Datotečni sistem
Celotni prostor:
Razpoložljivi prostor
15G medij ntfs +14,65 GB +3,86 GB
1.0G medij swap
1.0K medij
21G medij reiserfs +20,00 GB +13,86 GB
41G medij reiserfs +38,91 GB +36,71 GB
MOJ DISK vfat +37,27 GB +6,40 GB
Disketna enota auto +20,00 GB
Podatki o operacijskem sistemu
Operacijski sistem: Linux 2.6.16.13-4-default x86_64
Trenutni uporabnik: bgorjup@bogomir
Sistem: SUSE LINUX 10.1 (X86-64)
KDE: 3.5.1 Level "a"
Prikaži podatke
Proizvajalec: ATI Technologies Inc
Model: RV350 AP
Gonilnik: fglrx (S podporo za 3D)
Običajne mape
Moji dokumenti
Domači imenik
Imenik uporabnika root
Omrežni imeniki
Podatki o CPU
Procesor (CPU): AMD Athlon(tm) 64 Processor 2800+
Hitrost: +1.000,00 MHz
Podatki o pomnilniku
Celoten pomnilnik (RAM): +500,49 MB
Prosti pomnilnik: +12,40 MB (+ +199,68 MB Caches)

that is what I get when click on My Computer. But there is one interesting thing which I did not noticed since now and that is 21G media. I dont remember if that exists on my previous system SuSE 10.0. I think I only had 15G ntfs, 1G swap, 40G vfat separate disk for my files and 70G reiserfs. What for is this 21G reiserfs partition?
 
Old 06-27-2006, 09:02 PM   #29
doondoon900
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Apr 2006
Location: Jacksonville, Florida U.S.A.
Distribution: Suse 9.2
Posts: 18

Rep: Reputation: 0
Red face Suse on an intel?

Greetings smart masses,
Yes I am a newb and when I built my pc Feb 2005 I installed Suse because it was made for 64 bit AMD applications. Is this no longer the case? I recently re-installed it because it weent to runlevl 3 and wouldn't accept my passwords. Now I'm in the process of replacing the drivers for varous hardware. Fun, fun, fun!!!
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
How does the 64 bit version handle interacting with 32 bit programs? purelithium Mandriva 1 11-13-2005 05:16 PM
Which version of 32 bit redhat will install on IBM xSeries 366 (64 bit)? Hello123 Linux - Hardware 2 09-14-2005 05:50 AM
C, read 8 bit octal numbers, convert to 24 bit binary bamalabs Programming 3 01-20-2004 09:59 AM
Graphic Card that Supports displaying 8-bit and 24-bit images simultaneously yrraja Linux - Hardware 2 04-30-2003 06:41 AM
Displaying 8-bit images in 24-bit mode and vice versa yrraja Linux - General 4 04-29-2003 11:54 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > SUSE / openSUSE

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:51 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration