LinuxQuestions.org
Help answer threads with 0 replies.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Other *NIX Forums > Solaris / OpenSolaris
User Name
Password
Solaris / OpenSolaris This forum is for the discussion of Solaris, OpenSolaris, OpenIndiana, and illumos.
General Sun, SunOS and Sparc related questions also go here. Any Solaris fork or distribution is welcome.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 02-04-2006, 10:54 AM   #1
deemurphy
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Feb 2006
Posts: 16

Rep: Reputation: 0
Question x86 Solaris Install


Hello,

I have A system with 2 350 gb hards that are stripped raid. This is hardware raid.

I currently have 5 partitions, Windows XP Service 2 on one, Windows 2003 Server on one, School on one, Applications on one, and Web Development one another one.

I currently have about 325 gb hard disk left. I want to install Solaris 10 and need to know how and how much disk space is needed. I will also be installing Fedora and Suse and I am concerned because grub takes over.

Can someone point me in the right direction, or to a web site to help with this.

Thank you
Dee
 
Old 02-04-2006, 01:00 PM   #2
jlliagre
Moderator
 
Registered: Feb 2004
Location: Outside Paris
Distribution: Solaris 11.4, Oracle Linux, Mint, Debian/WSL
Posts: 9,789

Rep: Reputation: 492Reputation: 492Reputation: 492Reputation: 492Reputation: 492
Quote:
Originally Posted by deemurphy
Hello,

I have A system with 2 350 gb hards that are stripped raid. This is hardware raid.
First make sure your H/W raid is understood by Solaris.

Quote:

I currently have 5 partitions, Windows XP Service 2 on one, Windows 2003 Server on one, School on one, Applications on one, and Web Development one another one.

I currently have about 325 gb hard disk left.
It would help to know how is that free space available, and specifically if you have one primary partition slot available.

Quote:
I want to install Solaris 10 and need to know how and how much disk space is needed.
325 GB should be enough

Quote:
I will also be installing Fedora and Suse and I am concerned because grub takes over.
Install S10 update 1 or Solaris Express, its grub will be able to boot all of them.
 
Old 02-04-2006, 01:56 PM   #3
deemurphy
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Feb 2006
Posts: 16

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 0
The free space is not partitioned at all and I don/t want to use it all, I was thinking of using at least 20 gb each for Solaris, Fedora and Suse. Hard drives are striped raid 0. I have not installed Fedora, Suse or Solaris yet, but Have them. I do not know which to install first.

I have installed Fedora before on another computer and grub took over.

Do I partition first? Do I install Fedora and Suse without Grub and then use Solaris grub? Do I now have to download Solaris 10 update 1 or Express?

Thank you again
Dee
 
Old 02-04-2006, 03:04 PM   #4
jlliagre
Moderator
 
Registered: Feb 2004
Location: Outside Paris
Distribution: Solaris 11.4, Oracle Linux, Mint, Debian/WSL
Posts: 9,789

Rep: Reputation: 492Reputation: 492Reputation: 492Reputation: 492Reputation: 492
Quote:
Originally Posted by deemurphy
The free space is not partitioned at all and I don/t want to use it all, I was thinking of using at least 20 gb each for Solaris, Fedora and Suse.
Sounds OK.
Quote:
Hard drives are striped raid 0.
Doesn't tell if Solaris has support for your raid H/W.
Quote:
I have not installed Fedora, Suse or Solaris yet, but Have them. I do not know which to install first.
Doesn't matter that much, but be aware that Solaris requires a primary partition, so make sure preserving one.
Quote:
I have installed Fedora before on another computer and grub took over.
Can you elaborate.
Quote:
Do I partition first?
That makes sense.
Quote:
Do I install Fedora and Suse without Grub and then use Solaris grub?
You can have all grubs installed.
Quote:
Do I now have to download Solaris 10 update 1 or Express?
That's your choice, you do not tell why you want to install Solaris, for what purpose ...
 
Old 02-04-2006, 05:05 PM   #5
deemurphy
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Feb 2006
Posts: 16

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 0
My raid not hardware I have been told, it is software. The software raid is NVIDIA.
When I tried to install Fedora on this system we are talking about Grub would not let me get to windows, I had to uninstall it and going into both windows login and fix the boot.ini to make it work again.

Sounds like I have to create a partition for Solaris before installing it, Fedora and Suse tries to use free space.

I am installing thest because I just finished certificattions in CIW, going to Linux and Unix next. I have used both in my working environments, but need the certifications.

Thank you
Dee
 
Old 02-04-2006, 08:37 PM   #6
jlliagre
Moderator
 
Registered: Feb 2004
Location: Outside Paris
Distribution: Solaris 11.4, Oracle Linux, Mint, Debian/WSL
Posts: 9,789

Rep: Reputation: 492Reputation: 492Reputation: 492Reputation: 492Reputation: 492
Quote:
Originally Posted by deemurphy
My raid not hardware I have been told, it is software. The software raid is NVIDIA.
Looks very much hardware RAID to me, not software ...
Quote:
When I tried to install Fedora on this system we are talking about Grub would not let me get to windows, I had to uninstall it and going into both windows login and fix the boot.ini to make it work again.
Grub can pass control to windows boot.
Quote:
Sounds like I have to create a partition for Solaris before installing it, Fedora and Suse tries to use free space.
So does Solaris.
You overlook the Solaris primary partition requirement, though.
 
Old 02-04-2006, 09:45 PM   #7
deemurphy
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Feb 2006
Posts: 16

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 0
OK, based on your last replay I believe you suggest that I install Fedora and Suse doing a manualy partition with them, but do not use grub. Then install Solaris doing a manual partition but use grub to access all the operating environments. Is this correct?

Dee
 
Old 02-04-2006, 09:59 PM   #8
jlliagre
Moderator
 
Registered: Feb 2004
Location: Outside Paris
Distribution: Solaris 11.4, Oracle Linux, Mint, Debian/WSL
Posts: 9,789

Rep: Reputation: 492Reputation: 492Reputation: 492Reputation: 492Reputation: 492
I'm repeating myself, you are missing Solaris primary partition requirement.

You wrote you have 5 partitions on the initial system, but do not explain what is your current partition table, and the expected one once all O/Ses are installed.
 
Old 02-05-2006, 07:51 AM   #9
deemurphy
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Feb 2006
Posts: 16

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 0
I have 5 partition tables currently, all the rest 325 GB is free space, and has not been partitioned. There is partition for Windows XP, one for Windows 2003 Server. The other three are not operating system partitions. This is what I is was asking if I should partition as I do the installs. I know with Fedora and Suse even though I have all this free space I can manually partition the size I want those two to be.

Thank you
Dee
 
Old 02-05-2006, 08:23 AM   #10
jlliagre
Moderator
 
Registered: Feb 2004
Location: Outside Paris
Distribution: Solaris 11.4, Oracle Linux, Mint, Debian/WSL
Posts: 9,789

Rep: Reputation: 492Reputation: 492Reputation: 492Reputation: 492Reputation: 492
By design, there can be only 4 primary partitions, known as fdisk partitions.
When you use logical partitions, you loose at least one of the primaries.
As you seem to ignore what is your current partition layout, I'm assuming XP and 2003 are both using their own primary and that what you call the non operating system partitions are three logical partitions on a same primary slot.
If you want to install two Linux and one Solaris distribution, you have to make sure the linux ones are going to logical partitions on the same slot as the windows ones, and that a primary slot is kept free for Solaris.
 
Old 02-05-2006, 10:40 AM   #11
deemurphy
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Feb 2006
Posts: 16

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 0
Yes, that is my set up. The windows partitions are primary and the other partitions are logical. I assume during the installation of the two linux distributions that manually setting them I can make them logical. I will then create another primary partition of Solaris.

I think this is what you are stating. I also thiink do not use grub the the linux distributions, only for the solaris distribution and with this I can access all the operation system. I created a bitmap of my disk manaager, but see no way I can attach it.

Thank you
Dee
 
Old 02-05-2006, 11:23 AM   #12
jlliagre
Moderator
 
Registered: Feb 2004
Location: Outside Paris
Distribution: Solaris 11.4, Oracle Linux, Mint, Debian/WSL
Posts: 9,789

Rep: Reputation: 492Reputation: 492Reputation: 492Reputation: 492Reputation: 492
Sounds OK.
Don't forget to backup any important data you have, just in case, as playing with partition tables and installing O/Ses can prove destructive ...
 
Old 02-05-2006, 01:30 PM   #13
deemurphy
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Feb 2006
Posts: 16

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 0
I would like to thank you so much for all your help. I will working on doing this Monday evening and let you know how things wents.

Again, thank you for you help, understanding and patience.
Dee
 
Old 02-05-2006, 01:40 PM   #14
jlliagre
Moderator
 
Registered: Feb 2004
Location: Outside Paris
Distribution: Solaris 11.4, Oracle Linux, Mint, Debian/WSL
Posts: 9,789

Rep: Reputation: 492Reputation: 492Reputation: 492Reputation: 492Reputation: 492
You are welcome
 
Old 02-06-2006, 02:55 PM   #15
deemurphy
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Feb 2006
Posts: 16

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 0
Sada Raid0

I have one more questions to ask before I do this install tonight. My system is sada raid0. Does this make any difference.

Thanks
Dee
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
great solaris website for newbies http://solaris-x86.org/ feetyouwell Solaris / OpenSolaris 2 12-06-2006 12:14 AM
Install Solaris 9 x86 on a particular partition d1s4st3r Solaris / OpenSolaris 8 09-29-2004 03:13 PM
Solaris Install quarrel on x86 laptop! Gnute Solaris / OpenSolaris 4 04-17-2004 11:00 PM
Who has actually gotten Solaris 9 x86 To Install? g_goblin Solaris / OpenSolaris 13 12-24-2003 12:00 PM
Solaris 9 x86 Install Problem Astro Solaris / OpenSolaris 2 10-13-2003 06:14 AM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Other *NIX Forums > Solaris / OpenSolaris

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:57 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration