LinuxQuestions.org
Visit Jeremy's Blog.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware
User Name
Password
Slackware This Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.

Notices

Reply
 
Search this Thread
Old 06-01-2003, 05:42 PM   #16
C++freak
Member
 
Registered: Apr 2002
Location: NB, Canada
Distribution: Gentoo
Posts: 180

Rep: Reputation: 30

Why do I use Slackware? That's simple. Simplicity is a beautiful thing. None of this GUI package manager crap, it takes soo freaking long to do. That and all you need to get you up and running is one cd. Thats it. And it runs well on older machines. Yea, that and I can do things so much quicker in CLI anyway.. which is what it defaults to (whoo hoo!)..
 
Old 06-01-2003, 07:30 PM   #17
R_Shackleford
Member
 
Registered: May 2003
Location: Earth
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 76

Rep: Reputation: 15
I have tried Mandrake, Red Hat, and SuSE. I got used to RPM installation. Then I found a package that wasn't an RPM and that's when I had to start learning CLI. I attribute Mosfet's home page and FAQ's to my making the decision to change to Slackware. Mosfet (Daniel M. Duley) has worked on KDE development and wrote a really slick theme - Mosfet's High Performance Liquid. I tried to install it in Mandrake and it just crapped out. So I went to his page and that's where I learned about how Red Hat and Mandrake (and I assume many other distros) "rearrange" KDE to fit their tools in their distros. So I looked for a "purer" Linux. I had heard that Debian was for the hardcore coders and I wasn't sure that I was up to that yet. A little more digging on Distrowatch, and I decided on Slackware. I think I made a wise choice. Sure, I'll PLAY with some other distros from time to time, but Slack is the one I USE.
 
Old 06-01-2003, 07:45 PM   #18
Astro
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2003
Location: Ballston Lake, NY
Distribution: Slackware, Debian
Posts: 660

Rep: Reputation: 30
Well I'm using it cause it doesn't have all the sh*t that Redhat or the other major distros have. It fits what I need in one disc, and I have no complaints about too much shiznat being installed.
 
Old 06-01-2003, 07:46 PM   #19
kazuni
Member
 
Registered: May 2003
Location: Hong Kong
Distribution: Android on HTC Hero
Posts: 256

Rep: Reputation: 30
oh and i learned how to compile my own kernel too gotta love slack
 
Old 06-02-2003, 12:34 PM   #20
DaFrEQ
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2002
Location: Earth... for now
Distribution: SuSE9.2 AMD64; LFS; GentooAMD64; Ubuntu10.04; RHEL 5.5; Solaris10(SPARC)
Posts: 418

Rep: Reputation: 30
cuz I can.
 
Old 06-02-2003, 01:01 PM   #21
MasterC
Guru
 
Registered: Mar 2002
Location: Salt Lake City, UT - USA
Distribution: Gentoo ; LFS ; Kubuntu
Posts: 12,612

Rep: Reputation: 64
Quote:
Originally posted by DaFrEQ
cuz I can.
 
Old 06-02-2003, 01:57 PM   #22
DaFrEQ
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2002
Location: Earth... for now
Distribution: SuSE9.2 AMD64; LFS; GentooAMD64; Ubuntu10.04; RHEL 5.5; Solaris10(SPARC)
Posts: 418

Rep: Reputation: 30
Ya liked that one did ya MasterC?
 
Old 06-03-2003, 12:55 AM   #23
alloydog
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: May 2003
Posts: 25

Rep: Reputation: 15
Because it was the only one that fitted the requirements...

I am resurecting an old PC, or rather cobbled it together with bits lying around:
mainboard: ASUS SP97V
processor: 333MHz AMD K6-2
HDD: 14 GB IBM DeskStar
RAM: 64 MB 72 pin SIMM
plus other bits & bobs (CDROM, soundcard, etc etc ...)

TinyLinux went in OK, but was too minimal for me at the moment.
Basic Linux wouldn't boot.
RedHat 8 installed first go, but seemed to be i n c r e d e b l y sloooo o o o w!
Tried to install SuSe 8.1 from a magazine cover disc - No good, install seemd OK, but got package errors with the kernal & yast.
Slackware 9 - installed OK, but wouldn't boot - got a series of 99's. Booted from floppy OK
VectorLinux installed OK, but wouldn't boot - got a series of 99's. Booted from floppy OK. But, I stuck with Vector (got fed up with burning CDs) & discovered it was a lilo problem - probaly the reason Basic wouldn't boot either.

But, Vector is up & running, & I'll stick with it.
 
Old 06-03-2003, 04:42 PM   #24
JustSlack
Member
 
Registered: Jun 2003
Location: Gurnee, IL
Distribution: Mandrake
Posts: 65

Rep: Reputation: 15
I've used SuSE and Mandrake for a year (I celebrated my 1 year anniversary of Linux usage in May) and then tried Slackware. I was addicted almost immediately and now have only Slackware on my box. I had to learn how to get things running but learning is not a disease unless one prefers to remain ignorant.
 
Old 06-03-2003, 08:01 PM   #25
MasterC
Guru
 
Registered: Mar 2002
Location: Salt Lake City, UT - USA
Distribution: Gentoo ; LFS ; Kubuntu
Posts: 12,612

Rep: Reputation: 64
Quote:
Originally posted by DaFrEQ
Ya liked that one did ya MasterC?
Oh he!! yeah! It's one of the very few reasons anyone can argue with, and at the same time, it makes the most sense. Nice line, I didn't wanna steal it, so I quoted ya

Cool
 
Old 06-03-2003, 09:45 PM   #26
kremlar
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Jun 2003
Posts: 8

Rep: Reputation: 0
my harddrive died, and when i got a new one i thought, hey, maybe i'll try linux. i grabbed slackware just cause of the name, and never found a reason to try another distro since.
 
Old 06-03-2003, 09:56 PM   #27
jarquet
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Jun 2003
Location: Florida
Distribution: slack 10.1
Posts: 10

Rep: Reputation: 0
ahahhahaha. neat.

well, i cant tell you why im using slackware, because atm, im not. but i can tell you why i will when i visit my box again. (on an indefiniate vacation)

I started to install ARKlinux. first distro i came across, before i eve researched wtf a distro was. mistake. not only did the install freeze, but it decided to format all the hardrive i had hooked up without asking. bad mojo. lost 5 game images to that. pissed me off....

researched, and read that mandrake was the easiest to switch from windows, so i figured sure, why not. i think i did a total of 9 installs with mandrake before i got it working for more than 2 days. i will never understand why i had to (learn to)use fdisk to format/partition when the installer has its own... It worked fine for about a month too, but now all the sudden im gettin funny little errors with bash, root doesnt log in right, and now it wont even boot. No doubt, its my fault, but i dont know what i did, so thats no good.

in between mandrake installs i tried slackware. i liked it, but i couldnt get into the gui (firend later told me i had to configure kde and/or xwindows to get it to work, but i formated before i was told this) but i liked what i saw so far (the funny little quotes when i logged in were hella-nifty) but i didnt know enough about the console to explore around till i got it. so i went back to mandrake

Was gonna try redhat, since some website rated it as the best linux distro, but for some reason i get the impression that mandake is a lot like redhat, just redhat is more sophisticated. so that went down the tube

was gonna try suse, but read somewhere that it was another good distro for switching to linux from windows

If i wanted windows, i would keep using winxp. I want linux. i trust my ability to learn linux because there isnt much computer-related that i havnt been able to learn. after reading this forum, im def going with slack. and now i am comfortable enough with linux to play with slack till i get the gui workin. then i think im gonna be in my element, and its gonna be nice...

i dont seem to be able to make a short post....
 
Old 06-04-2003, 02:40 AM   #28
centr0
Member
 
Registered: Feb 2003
Location: Earth
Distribution: Slackware 9.1
Posts: 134

Rep: Reputation: 15
i started out with redhat because a friend had it. switched to slack because everyone said it was a good OS to learn from. 2 months into the linux world after i installed slack i tried to go back to redhat. it just felt like another windows to me. i got sick of it. i wanted to do everything from the command line. slack gives that to me. anyways. i uninstalled redhat and switched back to slack.
 
Old 06-04-2003, 06:08 PM   #29
titanium_geek
Senior Member
 
Registered: May 2002
Location: Melbourne Australia
Distribution: it died/ macosx
Posts: 2,478

Rep: Reputation: 50
wow.... my friend has a RH install, I have a Caldera CD, but after what you guys have said, I think I will go with slack, it seems like a good distro.. thanks. I was scared, but no longer.

titanium_geek
 
Old 06-05-2003, 12:53 PM   #30
nemat0de
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: May 2003
Location: DFDub-yah
Distribution: Slack 9.1 mandrake 10
Posts: 29

Rep: Reputation: 15
Because everyone I talked to said Slack is "Too Hard"
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
About Slackware 9.1 boot disk?? ftp://ftp.kpn.be/pub/linux/slackware/slackware-9.1-is AL3OMDAH Slackware 4 04-18-2007 09:54 AM
Dual boot windows/slackware, but slackware installed first? Cryptic_K Slackware 3 11-20-2006 12:49 PM
Slackware 10 RC2 released; Slackware 10 imminent... SBing Slackware 22 06-22-2004 07:53 AM
Newer Slackware Packages on older slackware version pengStudent Slackware 2 11-12-2003 12:47 PM
wine and winesetuptk working well with slackware 9.0 and slackware 9.1 oobe Linux - Software 0 10-19-2003 12:29 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:32 AM.

Main Menu
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration