View the Most Wanted LQ Wiki articles.
Go Back > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware
User Name
Slackware This Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.


  Search this Thread
Old 05-18-2008, 12:15 AM   #1
Registered: Feb 2008
Distribution: Debian Testing
Posts: 99
Blog Entries: 3

Rep: Reputation: 16
Third-party Repositories

Hi everyone:

First of all, I've already done some searches before this question.

For example, there has been a thread discussing which of the third-party repositories is most popular, but I didn't see concurs.

Anyway, it seems to me that is the most popular third-party repository. And my question is how to use it with slapt-get?

I know from

If I am to use the "NYI New York Internet" mirror, I would set
Slapt-get to

But when it comes to practice, I have the following questions.

- Does contains official packages as well?

- If not, do you recommend VectorLinux's repository? Does it have more packages than

- Will setting above find all packages from for me? Or it is only for the very version of Slackware that I choose?

- If I can't find the package that I want in Slackware-12.1, will packages from Slackware-12.0 be OK for me?

- If it is OK, how can I make slapt-get search Slackware-12.1 by default then fall back to Slackware-12.0 when not found?

- more on package finding, while doing random checking of the available packages, the first two packages from, FFmpeg & Firebird, I don't see them in

In this case, would slapt-get search find those 2 packages for me?
If not, what should I do?

All in all, what's the best practice using third-party repositories?

Thanks a lot


Last edited by sfxpt; 05-18-2008 at 12:17 AM.
Old 05-18-2008, 12:21 AM   #2
Registered: Feb 2008
Distribution: Debian Testing
Posts: 99
Blog Entries: 3

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 16
PS. coming from Debian, I'm more a use-a-package guy than build-my-own-package guy.

I respect your decision to build your own packages, but ...
Old 05-18-2008, 12:39 AM   #3
Registered: Aug 2005
Location: Fountain Valley, CA / Thailand
Distribution: Slackware64 14.0
Posts: 982

Rep: Reputation: 94
Use , better to build them on your own box then use a build from someone else. Be sure to read the FAQ @ slackbuilds.
Old 05-18-2008, 01:11 AM   #4
Senior Member
Registered: Jul 2007
Distribution: Slackware64-14.1
Posts: 2,363

Rep: Reputation: 828Reputation: 828Reputation: 828Reputation: 828Reputation: 828Reputation: 828Reputation: 828 is a more reliable source than in my opinion. I know nothing about slapt-get or slackpkg, so I can't be more help than that -- I will just say that has some poorly-built packages with questionable dependencies that have the possibility to bork your system. Although there ARE some reputable packagers at, you would have to find out which ones are reputable and only use their packages -- and that's a lot of work, and not very convenient when using slapt-get. has a large repository with well-built packages that all include a SlackBuild so you can see how they built it or compile it yourself using their SlackBuild, if you want.

I trust, Alien Bob's repository ( and rworkman's repository ( 100%, and 50% (though I'm a pessimist and I always just use the SlackBuilds from and not their pre-built packages). If you want huge repositories with every package you could possibly want, Slackware isn't the distro for you -- some packages won't be available anywhere and will need to be compiled (by you) from source. That being said, with the nice repositories listed above, that would be an exception instead of a rule, but just be warned.
Old 05-18-2008, 11:11 AM   #5
Registered: Feb 2008
Distribution: Debian Testing
Posts: 99
Blog Entries: 3

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 16
thanks a lot T3slider, that's really insightful.

anyone else has more experience with slapt-get & third-party repositories?

Old 05-18-2008, 01:54 PM   #6
Registered: Apr 2006
Location: SE Texas
Distribution: Slack64-C ML
Posts: 900

Rep: Reputation: 83

I also just came from Debian a few months ago. The big reason I came to slack is because I have to have a system that works after a package install. And doesn't break something else during a package install. And is reversible after a bad package install. If you'll just take the time to learn use SlackBuilds & src2pkg, I think you'll be rewarded with just about the most stable system available.

The only ready made packages that I will use is rworkman's, Alien Bob's, & sometimes

It only takes a little while to "roll yer own", and you'll get better results.

Last edited by slackass; 05-18-2008 at 01:56 PM.


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
RHEL 5 and 3rd Party Repositories. zcrxsir88 Linux - Server 5 02-21-2008 04:20 AM
RHEL 5 and 3rd Party Repositories. zcrxsir88 Linux - Security 2 02-18-2008 07:58 PM
LXer: DistroWatch Weekly: Etch delay, third-party software repositories, FreeBSD's security event auditing LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 11-20-2006 04:21 AM
*party* Wikipedia Reaches One Million Articles! *party* peter_89 General 1 03-01-2006 06:33 PM

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:34 PM.

Main Menu
Write for LQ is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration