LinuxQuestions.org
Welcome to the most active Linux Forum on the web.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware
User Name
Password
Slackware This Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.

Notices

Reply
 
Search this Thread
Old 04-16-2010, 05:51 PM   #1
joegumbo
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2006
Distribution: Frugalware
Posts: 228

Rep: Reputation: 32
(Solved) Virtualbox-kernel Slackbuild


For some reason, when I click on the Slackbuild link for virtualbox-kernel (3.1.6) for virtualbox-kernel-3.1.6.tar.xz , it downloads as virtualbox-kernel-3.1.6.tar.tar . The file is misnamed.

If it is renamed virtualbox-kernel-3.1.6.tar.xz , the SlackBuild works just fine.
Attached Images
File Type: jpeg vbox_kern.jpeg (123.8 KB, 19 views)

Last edited by joegumbo; 04-16-2010 at 05:53 PM.
 
Old 04-16-2010, 06:15 PM   #2
smoker
Senior Member
 
Registered: Oct 2004
Distribution: Fedora Core 4, 12, 13, 14, 15, 17
Posts: 2,279

Rep: Reputation: 248Reputation: 248Reputation: 248
So why is it in no replies then ?
If you fix it, reply and say so. Don't just edit your post.
 
0 members found this post helpful.
Old 04-17-2010, 09:23 AM   #3
joegumbo
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2006
Distribution: Frugalware
Posts: 228

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 32
Quote:
Originally Posted by smoker View Post
So why is it in no replies then ?
If you fix it, reply and say so. Don't just edit your post.
Hey smoker...

What are you talking about?!

I edited my post to enter the screenshot I took.

I decided to update VBox, ran into a problem, and solved it. Then I posted here in case anyone else, especially a noob, had a similar problem.

What's your problem?
 
Old 04-17-2010, 09:30 AM   #4
joegumbo
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2006
Distribution: Frugalware
Posts: 228

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 32
Smoker, just in case you missed it:

Then I posted here in case anyone else, especially a noob, had a similar problem.
 
Old 04-17-2010, 10:31 AM   #5
onebuck
Moderator
 
Registered: Jan 2005
Location: Midwest USA, Central Illinois
Distribution: SlackwareŽ
Posts: 11,197
Blog Entries: 3

Rep: Reputation: 1425Reputation: 1425Reputation: 1425Reputation: 1425Reputation: 1425Reputation: 1425Reputation: 1425Reputation: 1425Reputation: 1425Reputation: 1425
Hi,

Quote:
Originally Posted by joegumbo View Post
Smoker, just in case you missed it:

Then I posted here in case anyone else, especially a noob, had a similar problem.
It is customary to post the solution not edit the original post. By editing the original you are possibly introducing confusion. Unless you mark the original with 'EDIT' tags for each change or addition;

EDIT Some addition or solution
EDIT2: Additional append
EDIT3: Yet another append
EDIT... continuing

Plus you mark the thread as Solved via the Thread Tools.



EDIT: Tone it down a bit. No one was attacking you but trying to aid. BTW, see by example!

Last edited by onebuck; 04-17-2010 at 10:33 AM. Reason: Edit example
 
Old 04-17-2010, 10:47 AM   #6
joegumbo
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2006
Distribution: Frugalware
Posts: 228

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 32
Hi Onebuck,

I did not post a problem/question, then solve it, and then edit my post, and then use the forum tools to mark the topic header as solved. This is not what happened.

I solved the problem and then posted. The term Solved was part of the original topic header. The edit was to include the screenshot.

I did not use the forum tools to mark the post Solved. If you notice, "Solved" is written in blue font like the rest of my topic header. For those who use the forum tools to mark the thread solved, "SOLVED" renders in black font.

But, since we're on the subject...

In the future, if I discover a problem and solve it, how should the header be written to let folks know that a problem was discovered and the solution is in the original post? Apparently if I mark it from the outset as "solved" in the original topic header, this will cause confusion. If I use the forum tools to mark the header as solved, this will cause confusion.

Thanks,
-Joe
 
Old 04-17-2010, 11:04 AM   #7
joegumbo
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2006
Distribution: Frugalware
Posts: 228

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 32
BTW, the font rendering as blue vs black shows up here:
http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/slackware-14/

Solved on this topic shows blue and SOLVED using the forum tools shows as black.

Thanks
 
Old 04-17-2010, 03:05 PM   #8
onebuck
Moderator
 
Registered: Jan 2005
Location: Midwest USA, Central Illinois
Distribution: SlackwareŽ
Posts: 11,197
Blog Entries: 3

Rep: Reputation: 1425Reputation: 1425Reputation: 1425Reputation: 1425Reputation: 1425Reputation: 1425Reputation: 1425Reputation: 1425Reputation: 1425Reputation: 1425
Hi,

Quote:
Originally Posted by joegumbo View Post
Hi Onebuck,

I did not post a problem/question, then solve it, and then edit my post, and then use the forum tools to mark the topic header as solved. This is not what happened.

I solved the problem and then posted. The term Solved was part of the original topic header. The edit was to include the screenshot.

I did not use the forum tools to mark the post Solved. If you notice, "Solved" is written in blue font like the rest of my topic header. For those who use the forum tools to mark the thread solved, "SOLVED" renders in black font.

But, since we're on the subject...

In the future, if I discover a problem and solve it, how should the header be written to let folks know that a problem was discovered and the solution is in the original post? Apparently if I mark it from the outset as "solved" in the original topic header, this will cause confusion. If I use the forum tools to mark the header as solved, this will cause confusion.

Thanks,
-Joe
Present the question to a MOD.

I would think that to present something as a gotcha or solution would be done in the manner of normal Thread post title. Since [SOLVED] is a tag that is OP controlled. Newbies have enough problems even doing a search let alone discern of a title that misleads.
 
Old 04-17-2010, 03:39 PM   #9
joegumbo
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2006
Distribution: Frugalware
Posts: 228

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 32
Quote:
Present the question to a MOD.

I would think that to present something as a gotcha or solution would be done in the manner of normal Thread post title. Since [SOLVED] is a tag that is OP controlled. Newbies have enough problems even doing a search let alone discern of a title that misleads.
Gary,

But if I do not marked it as solved, I'm going to get yelled at for wasting people's time. Folks will click on the thread link thinking someone needs help, only to find that they've wasted their time on a problem that is already solved.
I'm pretty confident that any newbie that came across my thread would understand the title. Ironically, it seems to be giving some advanced users problems. But to keep the peace, I'll use a different approach.

I'm really not such a bad guy. I remember what it was like to be a Slackware newbie and to waste a whole weekend over some trivial problem. Or, to just give up and learn to live with the problem. This mis-named download was a trivial matter and I just wanted to pay forward some of the help I received. I guess wasn't expecting confrontation. It really caught me off guard.


-Joe

Last edited by joegumbo; 04-17-2010 at 03:48 PM. Reason: Additional comment.
 
Old 04-17-2010, 04:18 PM   #10
astrogeek
Senior Member
 
Registered: Oct 2008
Distribution: Slackware: 12.1, 13.1, 14.1, 64-14.1, -current, FreeBSD-10
Posts: 1,852

Rep: Reputation: 626Reputation: 626Reputation: 626Reputation: 626Reputation: 626Reputation: 626
Thumbs up

Quote:
Originally Posted by joegumbo View Post
I'm really not such a bad guy. I remember what it was like to be a Slackware newbie and to waste a whole weekend over some trivial problem. Or, to just give up and learn to live with the problem. This mis-named download was a trivial matter and I just wanted to pay forward some of the help I received. I guess wasn't expecting confrontation. It really caught me off guard.

-Joe
Hi Joe, FWIW I too, thought the response was a bit off the mark, and uncharacteristic for this board... and although I am not directly affected by the problem you pointed out, let me say THANK YOU for your motivation, intent and efforts - it is appreciated!
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 04-17-2010, 08:10 PM   #11
joegumbo
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2006
Distribution: Frugalware
Posts: 228

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 32
Quote:
Originally Posted by astrogeek View Post
Hi Joe, FWIW I too, thought the response was a bit off the mark, and uncharacteristic for this board... and although I am not directly affected by the problem you pointed out, let me say THANK YOU for your motivation, intent and efforts - it is appreciated!
I very much appreciate the moral support!!!!!

Thank you!!!!!!!!!!!!

-Joe
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
{Solved} Trying to compile bluez 4.58 from a slackbuild and hit some snags AuroraZero Linux - Software 4 02-11-2010 07:34 PM
[SOLVED] nvidia kernel module with custom kernel feech Linux - Kernel 2 01-26-2010 01:25 PM
Virtualbox 2.1.2 Slackbuild TL_CLD Slackware 23 02-18-2009 05:25 AM
Installing VirtualBox from SlackBuild - Slackware 12 - vboxdrv problem Do7AN Slackware 9 01-22-2009 01:58 PM
VirtualBox.SlackBuild problems joegumbo Slackware 2 09-01-2008 01:44 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:02 AM.

Main Menu
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration