SlackwareThis Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Indeed, run what suits you best. I can't believe this thread is still alive either. And yes, I'm aware of the irony in saying that while posting to it.
Yeah, people should run what ever distro makes them happy. I'm a Slacker and always will be, but, each to his own.
Heh-heh, I see what you mean, this thread is 5 years old.
Click here to see the post LQ members have rated as the most helpful post in this thread.
I wanted to use Ubuntu but after installing it I did not like Gnome and install KDE and everything was fine until I wanted to read a multisession CD and Ubuntu went blank, a know bug for which no solution found. I went back to slackware with the feeling that Ubuntu was a toy system.
If that's anything to go by, Sheldon's (Big Bang Theory) favourite linux distro is Ubuntu. The guys writing this comedy should have done more research. I am sure Sheldon wouldn't have chosen Ubuntu, LOL.
You can draw more comparisons between Slack and Ubuntu then you can differences.
They both cater to making an easy to use desktop that is functional and easy to manage.
Ubuntu mainly differs from slack in that it has a lot of extra software on top (automounters, clipboard managers, pulseaudio etc) and "hides" more from the user.
I think the main reason Slack is different in that it succusfully employs the KISS principle.
There are definitly more goals in common between the two though, and I think it is silly to try and pain them as different ends of the spectrum. IMO, the fact that an entire install is recommend and expected demontsrates this a lot.
The fact that it doesn't get in the way too much of people wanting to hack around and do other things is a definite plus, and it's why I still sue slack, to avoid things like dependancy hell and such.
I made a thread quite a while ago asking why people in here typically spoke ill of ubuntu. It was an interesting thread, because many of the negative claims made turned out to be myths or untrue when challenged.
Or he may believe the old myth that Slack is hard to run and needs a lot of configuring, and that Ubuntu works "out of the box". But it goes to show that generalisations like "Ubuntu is a newbies distro" are wrong.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.