SlackwareThis Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Distribution: Mint 20.3 MATE, Android, Windows 10, MX Linux and Mint 21.1 MATE
Posts: 1,052
Rep:
Slackware installing 14.1 or current...?
Good day, if I try out Slackware, should I use current, or 14.1? Has Slackware become easier to install? I plan to either install Mint or Slackware on an external 2.5 inch SATA 160 GB HDD for document writing and portability. I also like Compiz Fusion. My computer is a Lenovo. 8GB RAM. i5 CPU.
Distribution: Slackware64-current with "True Multilib" and KDE4Town.
Posts: 9,124
Rep:
Slackware-14.2 will be released very soon and it is based on the "current" state of -current so installing the "current" version of -current would be a pretty safe bet.
Distribution: Slackware64 15.0 (started with 13.37). Testing -current in a spare partition.
Posts: 931
Rep:
As cwizardone said, Slackware 14.2 is just around the corner (better say 'when it's ready )
so install -current and just change to a 14.2 mirror in /etc/slackpkg/mirrors when 14.2 is released
if you want a stable release.
Good day, if I try out Slackware, should I use current, or 14.1?
By all means try current now, as 14.2 should be ready very soon.
Quote:
Has Slackware become easier to install?
I think it became easier to configure than it was a few years ago. The installation process hasn't changed much throughout the years and is fairly simple in my opinion. It is the configuration that is the most time consuming.
Quote:
I plan to either install Mint or Slackware on an external 2.5 inch SATA 160 GB HDD for document writing and portability.
If you decide to try Slackware Live then that would be a great way to use on testing hardware to see how things work for you. If you want to customize the Live Edition is well documented to produce your own.
As announced before, I have “re-written” the original blog post on Slackware Live and saved the old text in a new article so that it does not get lost in history. The URL of the original article is visited a lot and I do not want people reading that original article to think that this project is still in beta, immature and not usable.
If your main usage is document writing I suggest trying Salix. It is fully compatible with Slackware, the installation is slightly easier for newcomers and it ships libreoffice out of the box. It comes in one edition per desktop or windows manager.
Caveat emptor: Salix has no -current branch and expect the 14.2 version of the XFCE edition one month or so after the release of Slackware 14.2. Before that you won't get the most recent software versions.
PS If you want more recent software you could give a go to Slackel Openbox 6.0.6, that has just been released with install and live versions. Dimitris Tzemos follows the development of Slackware-current, you could "migrate' to Slackware 14.2 when it will be released if you prefer.
Last edited by Didier Spaier; 06-03-2016 at 10:43 AM.
Reason: Typo fixed.
As cwizardone said, Slackware 14.2 is just around the corner (better say 'when it's ready )
so install -current and just change to a 14.2 mirror in /etc/slackpkg/mirrors when 14.2 is released
if you want a stable release.
No need
Code:
Wed May 11 05:20:01 UTC 2016
ap/slackpkg-2.82.1-noarch-1.txz: Upgraded.
Updated x86* mirrors lists for Slackware 14.2.
Wed May 11 05:20:01 UTC 2016
ap/slackpkg-2.82.1-noarch-1.txz: Upgraded.
Updated x86* mirrors lists for Slackware 14.2.
He just meant you'd need to change your slackpkg from pointing to a -current mirror to a 14.2 mirror. But as you noticed, the mirror file has already been updated, so you won't have to manually find the mirrors or add entries yourself... just comment out your -current mirror and uncomment your 14.2 mirror.
I've been using 14.1 on laptops, desktops and servers for two years, and only encountered two bugs.
One of them prevents any version of keepalived(8) from being compiled, due to contradictory forward declarations in some system include files, and is only relevant to very specialized server roles.
The other is a tcsh(1) bug, whereby some tty parameters are set incorrectly such that less(1) exhibits display problems. This is only relevant if you're using tcsh(1) (which almost nobody does; bash(1) is king these days), and can be worked around.
Since 14.1 satisfies all of my desktop/laptop needs, and I'm fairly confident to not run into any additional bugs, I plan on continue using 14.1 for my laptop and desktops. Why fix what isn't broken?
On the other hand, newer laptop hardware might require 14.2's newer kernel .. or might not. We'll see.
I'm very interested in switching to 14.2 for some server roles -- I want the newer perl, samba, bind, apache-httpd, smartmontools and openssh, and would like to see if IPv6 is better supported (it's very spotty in 14.1, and would use it more if the network management tools weren't so hobbled).
My point is, if you're looking at desktop use, 14.1 is just fine, and you'd likely be quite happy with it.
On the other hand, 14.2 is shaping up quite well, and -current is very nearly there (PV sent out a "last call" for bugfix reports, and it's received a couple rounds of bugfix patches already), so installing -current would likely be fine too.
On the other other hand, it's been my observation that after each stable Slackware release, additional bug reports trickle in for some months (and the bugs get fixed). Because of this, I like to wait a couple of months before starting my stress-testing of the new release, but I'm neurotically risk-averse. Someone with a more typical tolerance of risk will likely be fine using the new stable release right out of the gate.
W00T!! Thank you for this! I'll give it a shot tomorrow!
I spent some hours digging at the problem, but as far as I could tell there were functions declared with different interfaces in different .h files, it was going to need serious patching, and I shelved it until such time I felt like doing that. If your one-line SlackBuild change fixes this, I'll be loving life.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.