LinuxQuestions.org
View the Most Wanted LQ Wiki articles.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware
User Name
Password
Slackware This Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.

Notices

Reply
 
Search this Thread
Old 02-08-2005, 04:24 PM   #1
mustafa
Member
 
Registered: Feb 2003
Distribution: gentoo
Posts: 87

Rep: Reputation: 15
slackware current


I have just installed slack 10.0 and then I saw on slackware.org that 10.1 is out. I just wonder what is the difference between slack 10.1 and my slack 10.0 with updates using swaret to current?
Is there any difference at all or shall I reinstall?


regards
 
Old 02-08-2005, 04:32 PM   #2
cereal83
Member
 
Registered: Feb 2004
Location: Canada
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 478

Rep: Reputation: 30
Well 10.1 has updated programs and probably bug fixed. it used kernel 2.4.29 while 10 used 2.4.26.

Maybe if you look at the changelog it will tell you a bit more. You can even checkout http://distrowatch.com/table.php?distribution=slackware and scroll down and it will say what versions of program are running on 10 and 10.1

I wouldn't upgrade if it's a main computer but if it's the 2nd os and you don't care if you loose the info you have then I would reinstall

All up to you
 
Old 02-08-2005, 04:37 PM   #3
mustafa
Member
 
Registered: Feb 2003
Distribution: gentoo
Posts: 87

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 15
slackware current

Well I do mind a bit about losing all my configurations.
I use kernel 2.6.10 and the system is fully upgraded so the difference might not be to big.


regards
 
Old 02-08-2005, 04:41 PM   #4
cereal83
Member
 
Registered: Feb 2004
Location: Canada
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 478

Rep: Reputation: 30
Then I would just upgrade the packages you use alot to current and just leave it on 10.0!
 
Old 02-08-2005, 04:46 PM   #5
mustafa
Member
 
Registered: Feb 2003
Distribution: gentoo
Posts: 87

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 15
slackware current

OK. Maybe I will.

Thanks for your help and your fast replies.

regards
 
Old 02-08-2005, 07:32 PM   #6
eelriver
Member
 
Registered: May 2004
Location: san francisco
Distribution: Slackware 10.2 kernel 2.6.13, Gentoo amd64, Some mish-mash of programs that started with slack 9.0
Posts: 165

Rep: Reputation: 30
Quote:
Originally posted by cereal83
Then I would just upgrade the packages you use alot to current and just leave it on 10.0!
Bad idea. If you try this you will be mixing packages compiled with differrent glibc, x packages compiled against a different Xorg, etc. It's better to go one or the other, mixing is asking for trouble.

Read the changelog to see if you think it's worth it, then read UPGRADE.TXT to find out how. It doesn't mean loosing all your data. It's actually very simple.
 
Old 02-08-2005, 08:19 PM   #7
cereal83
Member
 
Registered: Feb 2004
Location: Canada
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 478

Rep: Reputation: 30
^^

Never thought of that. Good point!
 
Old 02-08-2005, 09:50 PM   #8
slakmagik
Senior Member
 
Registered: Feb 2003
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 4,113

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Quote:
Originally posted by eelriver
Bad idea. If you try this you will be mixing packages compiled with differrent glibc, x packages compiled against a different Xorg, etc. It's better to go one or the other, mixing is asking for trouble.
Actually, it's no big deal. Glibc and binutils and the kernel's not even a minor difference, gcc's the same.

binutils 2.15.90.0.3 > binutils 2-15.92.0.2
gcc 3.3.4 = gcc 3.3.4
glibc 2.3.2 > glibc 2.3.4
linux 2.4.26 > linux 2.4.29
(or linux 2.6.7 > linux 2.6.10)

A *lot* of Slackware 10.1 is composed of the same packages as 10.0. I mean, in other words, 10.1 is already 'mixed' even if you install it clean. And I upgraded a 10 I had laying around with no problems - no lost configs.

So the flipside of that is that if you're expecting a Giant Leap when you upgrade, you'll probably be disappointed. 11 is where the fun happens and stuff's going to break. Linux 2.6 default, almost definitely, new glibc and gcc, Gnome out completely, etc, etc.

But slackware-current=10.1 if you've been upgrading everything. I mean, current isn't this magic thing. You're either running bare 10 (which you shouldn't be), an updated 10 taking only things from 10's /patches, or 10.1/current which, at the moment, are identical. They'll only be different when /patches is opened up on 10.1 and non-bugfix upgrades go into -current. The idea of 'upgrading' from -current to 10.1 is impossible.
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Where to get Slackware Current? mjjzf Slackware 3 07-09-2005 10:03 AM
how do you keep up with slackware-current? elyk Slackware 33 05-07-2005 11:21 PM
slackware-current how to salahuddin_66 Slackware 9 02-17-2005 07:42 AM
slackware 8.1 iso vs slackware current illtbagu Slackware 9 02-26-2003 07:10 PM
New slackware-current... taz.devil Linux - General 7 12-03-2001 05:31 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:44 PM.

Main Menu
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration