LinuxQuestions.org
Share your knowledge at the LQ Wiki.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware
User Name
Password
Slackware This Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.

Notices

Closed Thread
 
Search this Thread
Old 06-08-2011, 10:55 AM   #1
fl0
Member
 
Registered: May 2010
Location: Germany
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 105

Rep: Reputation: 34
slackware and systemd


Hi @all,

fedora 15 and i think the next opensuse change the init system to systemd, is there a plan to do this in slackware also?

Or when not, why not?(please no flames)

rgds fl0

Last edited by fl0; 06-08-2011 at 11:15 AM.
 
Click here to see the post LQ members have rated as the most helpful post in this thread.
Old 06-08-2011, 11:01 AM   #2
andrewthomas
Senior Member
 
Registered: May 2010
Location: Chicago Metro
Distribution: Arch, Gentoo, Slackware
Posts: 1,690

Rep: Reputation: 307Reputation: 307Reputation: 307Reputation: 307
Quote:
Originally Posted by fl0 View Post
why not?
The question is why.
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 06-08-2011, 11:04 AM   #3
brianL
LQ 5k Club
 
Registered: Jan 2006
Location: Oldham, Lancs, England
Distribution: Slackware & Slackware64 14.1
Posts: 7,039
Blog Entries: 52

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Well, one of the Slackware Team doesn't seem too keen on systemd:
http://www.linuxquestions.org/questi...ml#post4379271
 
Old 06-08-2011, 11:05 AM   #4
Beelzebud
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2010
Distribution: Arch & Slackware
Posts: 95

Rep: Reputation: 22
It's from the same guy that brought us Pulse Audio, so call me skeptical of the need for it. I took a look at the docs for the Arch Linux package for it, and it seemed like a lot of effort to arrive right back where I started.
 
2 members found this post helpful.
Old 06-08-2011, 11:48 AM   #5
55020
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2009
Location: Yorks. W.R. 167397
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 387
Blog Entries: 4

Rep: Reputation: 366Reputation: 366Reputation: 366Reputation: 366
Let me summarise. systemd is exactly the sort of thing a one-club golfer would come up with if he had extraordinarily deep C skills, no systems administration experience, no historical perspective, and didn't consult anyone who might spoil the illusion.

What is needed out there is something that is

well evolved to fit its niche (which the bsd/sysvinit mechanisms are, and systemd/upstart aren't yet and won't/*can't* match until 40 years have passed),

universally understood (which the bsd/sysvinit mechanisms are, and systemd/upstart aren't yet and won't/*can't* be until 40 years have passed),

simple to the point of triviality and hammered millions of times a day, so it is utterly reliable (which the bsd/sysvinit mechanisms are, and systemd/upstart aren't yet and won't/*can't* match until 40 years have passed),

stable and unchanging, and therefore needing minimal maintenance (which the bsd/sysvinit mechanisms have been for 40 years, whereas who's to say that systemd/upstart will still be recognisable ten years from now? Remember when hal was the new panacea, huh?)

highly hackable for weird and unpredicatable ad-hoc requirements under extreme time pressure at three in the morning using lowest common denominator knowledge and tools, while everyone around you is screaming at you and losing their sanity (which the bsd/sysvinit mechanisms are, and systemd/upstart are not).

That's for starters. Anything else?
 
28 members found this post helpful.
Old 06-08-2011, 12:26 PM   #6
volkerdi
Slackware Maintainer
 
Registered: Dec 2002
Location: Minnesota
Distribution: Slackware! :-)
Posts: 874

Rep: Reputation: 1810Reputation: 1810Reputation: 1810Reputation: 1810Reputation: 1810Reputation: 1810Reputation: 1810Reputation: 1810Reputation: 1810Reputation: 1810Reputation: 1810
Quote:
Originally Posted by fl0 View Post
Hi @all,

fedora 15 and i think the next opensuse change the init system to systemd, is there a plan to do this in slackware also?

Or when not, why not?(please no flames)

rgds fl0
Let's just switch to any crazy idea Lennart can come up with.

---
Those who do not understand Unix are condemned to reinvent it, poorly.
-- Henry Spencer
 
21 members found this post helpful.
Old 06-08-2011, 12:33 PM   #7
Phorize
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2005
Location: UK
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 218

Rep: Reputation: 26
Quote:
Originally Posted by volkerdi View Post
Let's just switch to any crazy idea Lennart can come up with.

---
Those who do not understand Unix are condemned to reinvent it, poorly.
-- Henry Spencer
I heard that, my computer boots, why do I need a new boot process?
 
Old 06-08-2011, 12:47 PM   #8
volkerdi
Slackware Maintainer
 
Registered: Dec 2002
Location: Minnesota
Distribution: Slackware! :-)
Posts: 874

Rep: Reputation: 1810Reputation: 1810Reputation: 1810Reputation: 1810Reputation: 1810Reputation: 1810Reputation: 1810Reputation: 1810Reputation: 1810Reputation: 1810Reputation: 1810
Quote:
Originally Posted by kristizz View Post
I heard that, my computer boots, why do I need a new boot process?
Well, the problem with using shell scripts in the boot process is that it goes through a lot of PIDs, and it would be "less ugly" to arrive at a usable machine state with a PID in the hundreds, or lower. If everything has to break in order to achieve that, it seems like a good trade. Eventually all the broken stuff will be fixed, right?

I think that's the basic rationale. And maybe shave a few more seconds off boot time, but who boots much (or cares)? My servers and desktops remain on, and my laptops are usually on, suspended, or hibernated. I would prefer a reliable and well-understood boot system like the one we have.

My primary concern is that the systemd cabal is going to be pushing it as a dependency wherever possible, but we'll deal with that if it happens. But if any major distributions do actually release using systemd, the world will be stuck with it forever. If that's the case, I hope it turns out to be a good idea...
 
20 members found this post helpful.
Old 06-08-2011, 12:50 PM   #9
fl0
Member
 
Registered: May 2010
Location: Germany
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 105

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 34
Quote:
Originally Posted by volkerdi View Post
Let's just switch to any crazy idea Lennart can come up with.

---
Those who do not understand Unix are condemned to reinvent it, poorly.
-- Henry Spencer
so i assume there is no plan to integrate systemd in slackware... and there is no way to discuss this on a non flame way...
 
3 members found this post helpful.
Old 06-08-2011, 12:52 PM   #10
GazL
Senior Member
 
Registered: May 2008
Posts: 3,425

Rep: Reputation: 937Reputation: 937Reputation: 937Reputation: 937Reputation: 937Reputation: 937Reputation: 937Reputation: 937
Quote:
Originally Posted by volkerdi View Post
Let's just switch to any crazy idea Lennart can come up with.
Not every idea he has is crazy. The ideas behind a tmpfs /run directory for use in the initrd/early userspace seemed to make a lot of sense. Can't say I like much else of what he's come up with though.
 
Old 06-08-2011, 01:10 PM   #11
BrZ
Member
 
Registered: Apr 2009
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 495

Rep: Reputation: 81
Unhappy

Another 'friendly' layer pushed by Red Hat, Novell, Intel, Nokia and other corps. The thing seems unfinished... Felt it coming, but not so soon.

(No flames. Just my mind floating around.)
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 06-08-2011, 01:14 PM   #12
jpkirchner
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Sep 2005
Location: Malta, NY
Distribution: Slackware 13.37
Posts: 12

Rep: Reputation: 0
Quote:
Originally Posted by volkerdi View Post
....My primary concern is that the systemd cabal is going to be pushing it as a dependency wherever possible, but we'll deal with that if it happens. But if any major distributions do actually release using systemd, the world will be stuck with it forever. If that's the case, I hope it turns out to be a good idea...
I did read that "systemd has since been proposed as an external dependency of GNOME 3.2 by the project's author.This would essentially require all distributions that use GNOME to use systemd, or at least include it as a configurable option."

Of course, I do not use Gnome so not worried in that respect...

My computers work just fine with Slackware the way it is...tried and true...
 
Old 06-08-2011, 01:53 PM   #13
sahko
Senior Member
 
Registered: Sep 2008
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 1,041

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Quote:
Originally Posted by 55020 View Post
Let me summarise. systemd is exactly the sort of thing a one-club golfer would come up with if he had extraordinarily deep C skills, no systems administration experience, no historical perspective, and didn't consult anyone who might spoil the illusion.

What is needed out there is something that is

well evolved to fit its niche (which the bsd/sysvinit mechanisms are, and systemd/upstart aren't yet and won't/*can't* match until 40 years have passed),

universally understood (which the bsd/sysvinit mechanisms are, and systemd/upstart aren't yet and won't/*can't* be until 40 years have passed),

simple to the point of triviality and hammered millions of times a day, so it is utterly reliable (which the bsd/sysvinit mechanisms are, and systemd/upstart aren't yet and won't/*can't* match until 40 years have passed),

stable and unchanging, and therefore needing minimal maintenance (which the bsd/sysvinit mechanisms have been for 40 years, whereas who's to say that systemd/upstart will still be recognisable ten years from now? Remember when hal was the new panacea, huh?)

highly hackable for weird and unpredicatable ad-hoc requirements under extreme time pressure at three in the morning using lowest common denominator knowledge and tools, while everyone around you is screaming at you and losing their sanity (which the bsd/sysvinit mechanisms are, and systemd/upstart are not).

That's for starters. Anything else?
55020 is officially my hero.
After the best post i've ever read anywhere on the internet about dependency resolution, now this. Thank you!
 
Old 06-08-2011, 02:42 PM   #14
55020
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2009
Location: Yorks. W.R. 167397
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 387
Blog Entries: 4

Rep: Reputation: 366Reputation: 366Reputation: 366Reputation: 366
@sahko thanks, but what Mr Volkerding and the real Slack experts write, when they find time to do so, is always more insightful, more informed, more balanced, and (usually) more polite. However, they make better use of their spare time (for example) playing golf, instead of being grumpy on the Net. And they're right to do that.
 
Old 06-09-2011, 07:40 AM   #15
imitheos
Member
 
Registered: May 2005
Location: Greece
Posts: 374

Rep: Reputation: 55
Quote:
Originally Posted by volkerdi View Post
I would prefer a reliable and well-understood boot system like the one we have.
+1

Systemd doesn't seem to provide the advantages necessary to justify the change (at least yet). I don't get the obsession of some people with boot times and why some major distributions change vital system components so easily without good reason. What's even worse is that these components become "standard" and then other distributions are forced to use them too.

I don't say that nothing should ever be changed. Progress is good and changes are required from time to time, but not change things just to change them.
 
  


Closed Thread


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Informaton on systemd init system? arashi256 Linux - Newbie 1 06-04-2011 07:06 PM
LXer: openSUSE 11.4 M6 Kills HAL, Brings WebYaST, Avoids SystemD LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 01-28-2011 11:50 PM
LXer: This week at LWN: Systemd and Fedora 14 LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 09-07-2010 01:00 AM
LXer: Systemd Test Day on Tuesday 2010/09/07 LXer Syndicated Linux News 5 09-06-2010 10:52 AM
About Slackware 9.1 boot disk?? ftp://ftp.kpn.be/pub/linux/slackware/slackware-9.1-is AL3OMDAH Slackware 4 04-18-2007 09:54 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:13 AM.

Main Menu
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration