SlackwareThis Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
It awhile till one get confortable with a distro, for me personally the next dostro I gonna try if I've the time is lfs, I think it suffices also simplicity is define ..
It takes awhile till one gets confortable with a distro, for me personally the next dostro I gonna try if I've the time is lfs, I think it suffices also simplicity is define ..
I have recently started as a Network Admin for a company who has their 7+ production servers running RH . They have been having some issues with RH so I have convinced them to use a different linux distro.
<devil's advocate>
What is the purpose of not solving issues on a running Linux box but rather making the magic "let's switch distros" suggestion while admitting you are not sure which distro should replace it - implying you would not know what problems you may face getting the new distro running.
I guess I am not a big fan of the switch distro silver bullet.
If "the issues" are related to the software running on your servers, and not business issues (that actually is not made clear), I have to wonder if making a project of identiying and resolving known issues might be wiser than complete change with unknown issues.
</devil's advocate>
While which distro we use does not matter for business - I do not use RH and do NOT like RH. I am very confortable with slack and enjoy using it.
Slack is more stable, secure and consistant then RH - so that is why I want to switch to slack. I only started this thread because I heard Debian was a good distro so I thought I might try it out at home and then if it was ok suggest it as one of the possible changes.
If slack's running smoothly why the change? It's not a matter of being a Slackware enthusiastic. It's a matter of being rational. Is it working whitout problems? Why risk yourself getting more problems with an unknown distro? If you're already familiar with slackware keep it. If you've started with debian and wanted to change to slack I'd say the same: why changing if this one has no problems? Companies don't have time to waste on this play of curiosity.
Just my personal thought.
Slack is more stable, secure and consistant then RH - so that is why I want to switch to slack. I only started this thread because I heard Debian was a good distro so I thought I might try it out at home and then if it was ok suggest it as one of the possible changes.
It sounds like you may be happier with you choice of Slackware, but if you really have the time, give Debian a spin. I would say they are strong in the same areas.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.