Should ProFTPD be removed from future Slackware releases?
SlackwareThis Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
The thread that resulted in this poll was "Slack 13.0 proftpd works only for anonymous". I don't know what the user helcik did, but on my default 13.1 system I simply uncommented proftpd in "/etc/inetd.conf" and I was able to login as any shell user, except for "root", because "root" is listed in "/etc/ftpusers".
Just because something does not work for one user, this should not be a reason to remove something from a distro.
As you can see in the other thread, the user helcik is starting proftpd in a non-default way "> proftdp -n -d5"; I don't see a "root" prompt "#", so that may well be the cause of the problem.
No - my vote is do not remove proftpd from slackware.
The points most strongly emphasized about USENET netiquette often include using simple electronic signatures, and avoiding multiposting, cross-posting, off-topic posting, hijacking a discussion thread, and other techniques used to minimize the effort required to read a post or a thread.
imho, security issues with proftpd, which are the reasons for this poll, have nothing to do with "proftpd-works-only-for-anonymous".
Wait, there's been ANOTHER hole in ProFTPD since this poll started? Heh.
vsftpd is the clear winner at this point and is the primary FTP service used and supported by most Linux distributions. It's been several years since I stopped using ProFTPd. I won't be bothered if it's removed.