Support LQ: Use code LQ3 and save $3 on Domain Registration
Go Back > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware
User Name
Slackware This Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.


  Search this Thread
Old 12-01-2003, 12:17 PM   #1
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: Louisville, KY
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 46

Rep: Reputation: 15
scsi emulation or not ?

I have setup scsi emulation on my cd drive initially to use cdrecord, but through the process I realized that I did not have to use scsi emulation.

Should I stop using scsi emulation ? I occasionally burn some discs, and do a little ripping from time to time. Which is better, the default ide/atapi, or scsi emulation ?
Old 12-01-2003, 12:50 PM   #2
Registered: Apr 2003
Location: Laval, Quebec, Canada
Distribution: Ubuntu
Posts: 121

Rep: Reputation: 15
scsi or not scsi?

I always had the same question...

But I always used scsi emulation since some burning apps won't use the reader if not configured as scsi......

And no, I never saw any speed improvement when using no scsi-emulation...

Old 12-01-2003, 01:16 PM   #3
Registered: Nov 2003
Distribution: Slackware Current
Posts: 210

Rep: Reputation: 30
I use k3b as a frontend for CD burning, which uses cdrdao. When I wasn't using scsi-emulation it gave me an error message, that cdrdao doesn't support atapi devices, that i would have to get the cvs version for that. When i enabled scsi emulation (much simplier then I imagined), the errors went away.

Hope that helps.

Old 12-01-2003, 01:37 PM   #4
LQ Veteran
Registered: Mar 2003
Location: Boise, ID
Distribution: Mint
Posts: 6,642

Rep: Reputation: 73
For me, I was having trouble burning CD's until I included scsi emulation, which fixed the problem. I'd say that if your system already works fine without it, there's no reason to put it in (for the simple reason that, well, it's already working the way you want it to work) -- J.W.
Old 12-01-2003, 03:17 PM   #5
Registered: Apr 2003
Location: uk
Distribution: slackware current
Posts: 746

Rep: Reputation: 52
I have also questioned this.
From the file README.atapi (xcdroast 0.98alpha-14 docs):

Please note that this is usally not required anymore [scsi emulation], as X-CD-Roast now
supports ATAPI devices directly. But using the direct ATAPI support
causes a lot of problems. Accessing devices takes a much longer time
and there is no DMA support, which will result in big CPU problems.

Well, this is from someone who I guess knows what he is saying.

I think scsi emulation will be obsolete in the 2.6 kernel when it is ready, but I reckon its stick with
append="hdx=ide-scsi" for now...

Old 12-01-2003, 03:23 PM   #6
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: Louisville, KY
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 46

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 15
Great input from everyone. Nice post tobyl. I think I will just keep using scsi emulation for now.


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
scsi emulation tux66 Slackware 4 05-25-2005 05:26 AM
SCSI emulation brokenflea Slackware 8 02-20-2005 08:11 PM
SCSI emulation bcf2 Mandriva 2 12-22-2004 04:06 PM
Scsi Emulation!! FearPasion710 Linux - General 3 09-20-2003 05:14 AM
scsi emulation, how? one Slackware 1 09-02-2003 02:58 PM

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:41 PM.

Main Menu
Write for LQ is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration