LinuxQuestions.org
Latest LQ Deal: Latest LQ Deals
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware
User Name
Password
Slackware This Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 01-14-2004, 10:00 AM   #1
hotplainrice
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Jan 2004
Location: Kuala Lumpur
Distribution: Slackware 9.1
Posts: 17

Rep: Reputation: 0
Remove fluxbox and how to get the latest ?


Hi O great slackware community,

I have Fluxbox-0.1.14 that was installed as a package (if im not mistaken) in Slackware 9.1. I now wonder how do I upgrade to the latest 0.9.7? Or do I have to remove the package and install the latest 0.9.7?

Thanks in advance.
 
Old 01-14-2004, 10:03 AM   #2
Kovacs
Member
 
Registered: Jul 2003
Distribution: FreeBSD 8.2 RELEASE
Posts: 607

Rep: Reputation: 32
Remove the package with removepkg packagename.tgz and install the new one from source, it really is a lot better. It's very small and fast to compile.
 
Old 01-14-2004, 10:47 AM   #3
hotplainrice
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Jan 2004
Location: Kuala Lumpur
Distribution: Slackware 9.1
Posts: 17

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 0
Thanks kovacs. I'm in Lynx right now without nice GUI. I downloaded the 0.9.7 source code and its in my home directory now. Ok so ill run the command tar -xvyf fluxblablabla-0.9.7.tar.bz2 and I get the directory fluxboxblabla. Should I unbzip it under home directory or somewhere else? After this how do I install it and get it working?

Thanks.
 
Old 01-14-2004, 11:38 AM   #4
paledread
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Aug 2003
Distribution: debian
Posts: 22

Rep: Reputation: 15
fluxbox in slackware

you would do better to download the slackware ...tgz package for fluxbox 9.7 from the fluxbox site and to install it with installpkg fluxbox......

it works for me. much easier.
 
Old 01-14-2004, 03:15 PM   #5
Kovacs
Member
 
Registered: Jul 2003
Distribution: FreeBSD 8.2 RELEASE
Posts: 607

Rep: Reputation: 32
I like to complie flux from source because I find it a bit faster that way, and also because you can compile in support for KDE and/or gnome apps, so icons that would go in the system tray (eg for kopete) go in the fluxbox slit.

If you still haven't downloaded and installed, untar the tarball to your home directory, then:

./configure (you can add --enable-kde and/or --enable-gnome to compile in support for either or both)
make
make install (as root)

the make install will put everything in /usr/local for you and you're ready to go. It's worth starting off with clean init and menu scripts in ~/.fluxbox because there are a lot of extra features in the new version.
 
Old 01-15-2004, 02:31 AM   #6
hotplainrice
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Jan 2004
Location: Kuala Lumpur
Distribution: Slackware 9.1
Posts: 17

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 0
Thanks guys. =) thanks kovacs for the kde tip.. =)
 
Old 01-15-2004, 03:12 AM   #7
hotplainrice
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Jan 2004
Location: Kuala Lumpur
Distribution: Slackware 9.1
Posts: 17

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 0
Now I got problems again. Kovacs, I did the make install under root. Then at command line I did "startx" but it gave me an error : command not found.. What do I do?
 
Old 01-15-2004, 05:01 AM   #8
Kovacs
Member
 
Registered: Jul 2003
Distribution: FreeBSD 8.2 RELEASE
Posts: 607

Rep: Reputation: 32
Are you trying to do startx as root? By default in Slack startx is not in root's path, you would have to change root's path to include /usr/X11R6/bin if you wanted to use X as root. That's not a very good idea though, so you should create a regular user account to use the gui.

If you're running as a regular user and it's complaining that it can't find fluxbox, you might need to check that it is actually installed in /usr/local/bin, and that your ~/.xinitrc explicitly has the full path to fluxbox:
exec /usr/local/bin/fluxbox
 
Old 01-15-2004, 07:20 AM   #9
Hangdog42
LQ Veteran
 
Registered: Feb 2003
Location: Maryland
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 7,803
Blog Entries: 1

Rep: Reputation: 422Reputation: 422Reputation: 422Reputation: 422Reputation: 422
Quote:
you would do better to download the slackware ...tgz package for fluxbox 9.7 from the fluxbox site and to install it with installpkg fluxbox......
I'm going to put in a plug for Checkinstall, which is one of the most useful tools I've found. When you compile a program from source, you run checkinstall instead of make install and checkinstall will create a Slackware package from the custom compiled code and then installs it like you would with installpkg. The upshot is you get the benefits of a custom compiled program with the ease of being able to use Slackware package managment tools.
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
latest kernel DS1 Debian 3 10-28-2005 01:11 PM
is it a better idea to migrate from the latest apache 1.3 to the latest apache 2.0? kublador Slackware 5 08-30-2004 04:06 PM
What's the latest unstable? Seventh Debian 8 02-17-2004 07:11 AM
How do I remove latest nvidia driver? - Suse 8.2 ford Linux - Hardware 3 01-18-2004 02:37 AM
Fluxbox: Enabling KDE using package install of fluxbox underline Linux - Software 0 12-27-2003 10:11 AM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:54 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration