SlackwareThis Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
This is great news.... was dreaming of this day since I started using linux .
Thanks for posting this in the forum.
What is so extraordinary about changing the number? The inside of the kernel remains the same. There are not revolutionary changes. So what is the excitation all about??
Now, my alpha-maleness sadly does not actually extend to all the
scripts and Makefile rules, so the kernel is fighting back, and is
calling itself 3.0.0-rc1. We'll have the usual 6-7 weeks to wrestle it
into submission, and get scripts etc cleaned up, and the final release
should be just "3.0". The -stable team can use the third number for
their versioning.
looks like for this -rc1, besides the tarball being named 3.0-rc1, the internal numbering is still the "old-way"
Quote:
$ uname -a
Linux gaslamp 3.0.0-rc1 #1 SMP PREEMPT Mon May 30 10:07:31 CEST 2011 x86_64 Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU E8500 @ 3.16GHz GenuineIntel GNU/Linux
I think having once in a while an event like this could be a nice occasion to review thingies (leaving the pain aside).
Distribution: Slackware (mainly) and then a lot of others...
Posts: 855
Rep:
@witek... ummm... have you tried to send a patch to the kernel.org? You would be amazed to the demand of quality they want in the code.
If Linus deems this as the next step then ot is the next step. I believe the man because he tells things as they are.
And yes, this is a cause of exicitement.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.