LinuxQuestions.org
Go Job Hunting at the LQ Job Marketplace
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware
User Name
Password
Slackware This Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.

Notices

Reply
 
Search this Thread
Old 07-22-2010, 07:48 AM   #1
stf92
Senior Member
 
Registered: Apr 2007
Location: Buenos Aires.
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 3,265

Rep: Reputation: 49
Gnome and Slackware.


Linux kernel 2.6, Slackware 12.0

Hi:
I am browsing the package list for Slackware 13.1, accessible through Slackware.com>Get Slack, and I see the package containing the Gnome desktop enviroment nowhere in the list. Should I conclude Gnome isn't part of the Slackware distributions? Thanks in advance.

Last edited by stf92; 07-22-2010 at 07:49 AM.
 
Old 07-22-2010, 07:56 AM   #2
pwc101
Senior Member
 
Registered: Oct 2005
Location: UK
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 1,847

Rep: Reputation: 128Reputation: 128
Yes, that is what you should conclude

Third party Slackware Gnome packages are available from a number of projects, including, but not limited to:Edit: It seems gware.org don't have a 13.0 or 13.1 version of Gnome available.

Last edited by pwc101; 07-22-2010 at 07:58 AM. Reason: Added gware.org
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 07-22-2010, 07:58 AM   #3
slackd
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2009
Location: Bhubaneswar, India
Distribution: Slackware, Ubuntu, Windows
Posts: 260
Blog Entries: 1

Rep: Reputation: 60
Thumbs up

Gnome is no longer a part of Slackware.

If you prefer GNOME, there are teams online producing GNOME
for Slackware. Here are a few places to look:

http://gnomeslackbuild.org
http://www.droplinegnome.net/
http://www.gware.org/
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 07-22-2010, 08:09 AM   #4
stf92
Senior Member
 
Registered: Apr 2007
Location: Buenos Aires.
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 3,265

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 49
Thanks. "Gnome is no longer a part of Slackware". This is in accordance with what I read in an post by an LQ member (dated 2004): "you'll find gnome in disc 2 of your slackware 9.1 distro". But then, if I could get slack 9.1 (or 9.0) I would have the official slackware release.

Good bye.
 
Old 07-22-2010, 09:07 AM   #5
dugan
Senior Member
 
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: Canada
Distribution: distro hopper
Posts: 4,972

Rep: Reputation: 1555Reputation: 1555Reputation: 1555Reputation: 1555Reputation: 1555Reputation: 1555Reputation: 1555Reputation: 1555Reputation: 1555Reputation: 1555Reputation: 1555
There's also GSlacky (go to www.slacky.eu and click on "GSlacky").
 
Old 07-22-2010, 12:01 PM   #6
hitest
Senior Member
 
Registered: Mar 2004
Location: Prince Rupert, B.C., Canada
Distribution: Slackware, OpenBSD
Posts: 4,273

Rep: Reputation: 586Reputation: 586Reputation: 586Reputation: 586Reputation: 586Reputation: 586
As previously mentioned Gnome is not a part of Slackware. I would strongly recommend gnomeslackbuild, it is an excellent version of Gnome for Slackware. I've used GSB; it does not replace many standard Slackware files.

http://gnomeslackbuild.org/
 
Old 07-22-2010, 01:26 PM   #7
stf92
Senior Member
 
Registered: Apr 2007
Location: Buenos Aires.
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 3,265

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 49
I do not very well know how to say this after so many posts received. My primary purpose was (and is) to get rid of KDE and use something else in its stead. Gnome was the first desktop environment (DE) I used when I discovered linux. Now, gnome not being part of the slack distros I must fall back on software not officially approved by Slackware. Although I know slackbuilds is currently kind of an official slack repository and its name appears in the slack page I made up my mind not to use gnome (and certainly not KDE).

I will try the DE I have in my 12.0 discs besides KDE: xfce. It'll be a relief for my machine, because the other two are real resource-eating monsters. Regards.
 
Old 07-22-2010, 01:39 PM   #8
rmjohnso
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2006
Location: Wisconsin
Distribution: Slackware64-Current
Posts: 294

Rep: Reputation: 43
I don't run or even install KDE. I run everything in XFCE, and I don't have any problems.
 
Old 07-22-2010, 01:41 PM   #9
Cheesesteak
Member
 
Registered: Jun 2008
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 101

Rep: Reputation: 24
Slackware is maintained by a small group of people, and it's Pat's decision alone as to what gets included in a release. Pat made the decision a few versions ago to remove GNOME, as it became a real bear to build and maintain. He has said that third-party GNOME packages, such as GSB and Dropline, offered a more complete desktop than what was included in official Slackware releases anyhow.

Although GNOME isn't officially supported by Pat and the crew, you can get help here since the GSB guys are active in this forum, as well as other GSB users.
 
Old 07-22-2010, 01:46 PM   #10
dugan
Senior Member
 
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: Canada
Distribution: distro hopper
Posts: 4,972

Rep: Reputation: 1555Reputation: 1555Reputation: 1555Reputation: 1555Reputation: 1555Reputation: 1555Reputation: 1555Reputation: 1555Reputation: 1555Reputation: 1555Reputation: 1555
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cheesesteak View Post
Although GNOME isn't officially supported by Pat and the crew, you can get help here since the GSB guys are active in this forum, as well as other GSB users.
That's true, but you'll certainly get better help on their user mailing list.

Stf92, if your goal is a fast and light desktop, try just OpenBox combined with Tint2. Or LXDE. Both are faster and lighter than Xfce, which is in turn faster and lighter than both GNOME and KDE.

Last edited by dugan; 07-22-2010 at 01:54 PM.
 
Old 07-22-2010, 02:27 PM   #11
stf92
Senior Member
 
Registered: Apr 2007
Location: Buenos Aires.
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 3,265

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 49
@rmjohnso: I'm glad to know it. And I will begin to study the doc needed to set it running. Regards.

@Cheesesteak: thank you for letting me know something about Slack's inner things.
Quote:
...GNOME, as it became a real bear to build and maintain.
I beg you to explain to me --my knowledge of English is poor-- the meaning of "bear" in this context. I really would like to know.

@dugan: I'll try them. Although speed and lightness necessarily come at the expense of some other things.

Independently of which is the desktop environment I shall use at present, I think I have here enough information to make a good decision in the near future. Thanks a lot for your kind replies.

EDIT: rereading, I now think the word bear here is self-explanatory.

Last edited by stf92; 07-22-2010 at 02:44 PM.
 
Old 07-22-2010, 07:25 PM   #12
damgar
Senior Member
 
Registered: Sep 2009
Location: dallas, tx
Distribution: Slackware - current multilib/gsb Arch
Posts: 1,949
Blog Entries: 8

Rep: Reputation: 201Reputation: 201Reputation: 201
I run GSB-2.26 on my laptop with 13 and one of my desktops is GSB-2.30 on 13.1. For my laptop I just omitted the KDE packages which will still install fluxbox and XFCE, then I used the GSB net-install to get GSB going. It's very well documented and works great.
 
Old 07-22-2010, 07:53 PM   #13
stf92
Senior Member
 
Registered: Apr 2007
Location: Buenos Aires.
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 3,265

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 49
Thanks. If by documentation we understand the GUI help system, I find KDE very poorly documented. It almost seems as if they were taking one's leg.
But I lack the reference of having used other desktop environments.
 
Old 07-22-2010, 07:57 PM   #14
damgar
Senior Member
 
Registered: Sep 2009
Location: dallas, tx
Distribution: Slackware - current multilib/gsb Arch
Posts: 1,949
Blog Entries: 8

Rep: Reputation: 201Reputation: 201Reputation: 201
Quote:
Originally Posted by stf92 View Post
Thanks. If by documentation we understand the GUI help system, I find KDE very poorly documented. It almost seems as if they were taking one's leg.
But I lack the reference of having used other desktop environments.
I was really referring to the website and the documentation there. I really don't think I've ever even looked at the help menus.
 
Old 07-23-2010, 04:33 AM   #15
pwc101
Senior Member
 
Registered: Oct 2005
Location: UK
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 1,847

Rep: Reputation: 128Reputation: 128
Quote:
Originally Posted by stf92 View Post
I would be much obliged to you if you point out my mistakes in English.
With that in mind...
Quote:
Originally Posted by stf92 View Post
It almost seems as if they were taking one's leg.
I think you may have meant "pulling one's leg".
 
  


Reply

Tags
gnome


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
GNOME with Slackware 12.2 dkpw Slackware 24 04-04-2009 08:18 AM
How to set perferred applications in Gnome/Slackware 12/Dropline Gnome ? perry Slackware 3 05-27-2008 04:53 PM
LXer: GNOME SlackBuild GNOME 2.22.1 Released for Slackware 12.1 LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 05-13-2008 03:20 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:56 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration