[SOLVED] Adobe Reader 9 associated itself to every file type in Xfce 4.4.
SlackwareThis Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Adobe Reader 9 associated itself to every file type in Xfce 4.4.
kernel 2.6.21.5, GNU/Linux (slackware 12.0).
Hi:
I had the bad idea of installing Adobe in my linux box and, as a result, even when I click on a .flac file the reader opens. What is bad about this is that Xfce help system is very poor. Menu bar>Help uses internet to open the site page, where there is very little help indeed.
Right clicking, for example, an HTML file, I can choose the application to open it with and I'll be asked if I want this to be the default action. But for every file type I should be making this work! Perhaps deleting a hidden file in ~/ where xfce registered the associations. I do not want to uninstall Adobe as it is really fast scanning docs. Any hint?
Thanks for your reply. KDE I have it installed, only for the benefit of its apps. But as a desktop environment I use Xfce. So it's really Xfce who must handle file associations, I think.
To make things worst, I seem to have lost the original associations. If I had a file whose type was unfamiliar to me (and suppose the file command does not know the type either), Xfce knew and a click revealed the application it was designed to run it with.
I'll give Okular a try. Foxit Reader is my default PDF reader in Windows.
Coming back to the issue, if I only knew where Xfce keeps the assocs, I would edit or remove the file. Another course of action would be just to delete ~/. after relocating my personal data. I assume the next execution of Xfce would create all the necessary files again. Regards.
2> Just for my user account. There are two of them: a normal user and root.
I did then the deletion thing, and the normal user seems to have come back to the normal values. Problem solved. A noticeable thing, however, is that ~/.local/share/applications/defaults.list, where ~/ is the normal user dir, is empty. It's only line is
Code:
[Default Applications]
, although before the deletion (I exited X after the deletion and restarted it) it was not empty. All entries were associations with Adobe, except one.
The fact that it is empty, therefor, comes as no surprise, except for the non-Adobe entry. The true default associations must be built-in into the code, I suppose. For else, how does xfce know that it must open .txt files with mousepad, as it in fact does? Well, good bye and thanks for your repl and generous help.
I regularly use multiple window manager/desktop environments on the same computers, though I tend to default to Fluxbox as my primary choice: Fluxbox/KDE/Gnome depending on the distro and computer.
Manipulating file associations under one has always carried through to the others when I've changed environments.
I don't think you have different sets of file association for XFCE and for KDE--I think both desktops access the same database, problably in a hidden file or directory in your /home, but display the interface to it differently.
If I am wrong, I trust that someone will educate me.
Last edited by frankbell; 02-05-2011 at 05:02 PM.
Reason: bad grandma. very bad grandma.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.