SUSE / openSUSEThis Forum is for the discussion of Suse Linux.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Hey, I downloaded the suse 9.3 - 5 CD set (32 bit) and ordered the 64 bit DVD through the mail, tried them both, and do not see any difference whatsoever except maybe a LITTLE bit of speed increase for the 64 bit but overall I don't see what the big deal is to have 64 bit support when the difference is minimal.
Suprisingly, I had less trouble with the 32 bit version, everything just seemed to go smoother with less dependency issues albeit a bit slower.
What IS supposed to be the difference between the two?
When I did an update of all the patches, it seemed to slow it down quite a bit also.
Is there some processes that do not HAVE to run? I'm only using suse for internet and have no printer installed if that makes a difference.
64bit support in linux is definately advancing, however you'll find a lot of little 'gotchas' that creep up.. The future is definately 64-bit in processing, however I wouldn't suggest going 64-bit unless you either have to or you know the hardship it can cause..
- many roprietary device drivers don't work (graphical, wireless via ndiswrapper, etc)
- binary applications don't work
- even many self-compiled programs will fail if not coded correctly..
Originally posted by rdwtux 64bit support in linux is definately advancing, however you'll find a lot of little 'gotchas' that creep up.. The future is definately 64-bit in processing, however I wouldn't suggest going 64-bit unless you either have to or you know the hardship it can cause..
- many roprietary device drivers don't work (graphical, wireless via ndiswrapper, etc)
- binary applications don't work
- even many self-compiled programs will fail if not coded correctly..
stick with 32bit..
Ahhh, that's why I am having these little quirks on this new install, I can't explain them, it's just a "different" install than the 5 cd set....
I'll go back to 32 bit, it seemed to work better for some reason.
RANDON
But if you take the negatives of trying to use 64-bit linux on the Desktop and weigh that against the current advantages (slight increase in compile... video manipulation perhaps, etc) it's tough to justify for the average user.
Hijacking a five year old thread for this question probably isn't the best way of getting answers to this question, and any information in the existing thread may be elapsed/outdated/wrong by now.
To your question, it should work if you have the correct libraries installed, and you should have the correct libraries installed if you have used package management rather than compiling packages yourself.
There are a certain number of 'shoulds' in there, though.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.