Red HatThis forum is for the discussion of Red Hat Linux.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Location: Student of University of Mumbai, Maharastra State, India
Distribution: Redhat Linux 9.0, Knoppix LIVE CD, Ubuntu Live CD, Kubuntu Live CD
Posts: 483
Rep:
Reading the thread, (though not completely) but I understood, that RedHat 9 was probably the last distribution to be freely distributed Linux OS from RedHat.
Also, I wud consider Redhat 9 as the best and the free Linux O.S. with a bunch of really good software.
While I just skimmed the thread you linked to, you might try CentOS. It is very similar to FC3 but might be more suitable for a server-like enviorment.(atleast from my experiences with FC2, FC3 might be better).
The only free Red Hat ended with RH9. The Fedora Project is being used as a cutting edge test bed for future RHEL releases - and as such should not be used in a production environment. CentOS is based on Red Hat and is usable and stable enough for your systems.
The different types of distros based on redhat systems is good advice. I would agree that FC# is really used for those who want to be on the cutting edge of technology and is not really stable enough for the server environment.
I have heard of CentOS and that is a good distro i will have a look into it thanks for the advice.
It is a shame redhat ditched development of the free linux distro and stuck to enterprise. I mean it would have been good to have seen RH 10.
Kernel-HOWTO from The Linux Documentation Project for instructions. Looks like they are working on a new document, but there are links to other locations for the HOWTO document.
Originally posted by XavierP The only free Red Hat ended with RH9. The Fedora Project is being used as a cutting edge test bed for future RHEL releases - and as such should not be used in a production environment.
The second part of the sentence has been made up by you. There is no such discouragement with regard to production use of Fedora Core. There are various target groups of Fedora Core for which the distribution just works. For others, the somewhat limited support life cycle may be the primary reason to not use FC on some types of servers, which cannot be upgraded easily after around a year.
That leading edge technology enters FC first, where it gets the chance to prove itself worthy to be included in Red Hat Enterprise Linux, is over-estimated. With its three public test releases prior to a final release, technology in Fedora Core is tested in a similar way like Red Hat Linux used to be with its Beta versions.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.