ProgrammingThis forum is for all programming questions.
The question does not have to be directly related to Linux and any language is fair game.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
I will pipe compressed archives to the standard input of a bash script.
How can I determine in the same script the name (or rather the extension) of the file that has been piped to the script?
My aim is as follows:
1. Pipe compressed files to the script
2. Which should call the appropriate de-compression utility to list the contents (filenames) in the archive
3. It should then return a specific exit code if the archive contained a windows executable
Well, my script will be specified an external scanner module called by a mail sanitizer in the case of compressed mail attachments.
So far I thought that the mail sanitizer passes the attachments to the standard input of such external scanner modules.
Now I rather think it saves the attachments to a temporary location and only passes the filename to the external modules.
If it is so, it is better, since I can then obtain the filename in $1, besides, e.g. unzip did not seem very eager to accept data to be uncompressed on its standard input...
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.