MandrivaThis Forum is for the discussion of Mandriva (Mandrake) Linux.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
When I began learning linux a fresh install for each new distro wansnt a big deal, but now that I finally have my firewall configured, smb, mail server, blah blah... its going to SUCK to redo the whole thing and I would rather minimize my downtime if possible.
It there an easy way to upgrade without losing everything? (Yes it might be a silly question but I thought I would ask before I leap.)
I was using Mandriva 2006 quite succesfully until this week, well apart from configuring my Lexmark Z615 printer.
I've loaded PCLinuxOS 0.92 onto my Pc and find it a better distribution than Mandriva.
The Control Center will be familiar to Mandriva users and I prefer the PCLinuxOS desktop visual presentation.
Through Synaptic I was able to download Open Office 2.0.2, Adboe Acrobat Reader and Real player.
It uses KDE which is fine by me.
Don't get me wrong, I think Mandriva 2006 and Mandriva One are good distributions, I just prefer PCLInuxOS which is better in my opinion.
Sounds nice but... Does it use a windows drive equaly as easy as Mandriva? I've been serching for a Linux OS for ages that will see a windows drive and work with it as aesy as Mandriva..
Most of the config files are in /etc. Maybe you should back up first.
Urpmi is better now but I remember with 10.1 it was scratchy, sometimes stuff was left behind that was not meant to be and others, Dependency hell.
There's an exclude list for stuff you don't want to upgrade, I have kde, xorg and kernel in there.
/etc/urpmi/...
Or use "locate FILENAME" to see where they are, from the konsole.
Glibc is a file that nearly everything else depends upon, so if you do upgrade that one, say goodbye to everything, and you're back to configuring, unless you backup, and/or print the conf files.
Last edited by GlennsPref; 06-08-2006 at 01:40 AM.
PCLinuxOS was originally based on Mandrake 9.2, so yes it is as easy to use.
It reads NTFS partitions, whilst it can read and write to Fat32 partitions in the same way as Mandriva.
Updates using synaptic are more regular than in Mandriva and I haven't had any KDE crash screens so far, which I had when trying Mandriva One.
I also got a KDE crash screens when trying to use Noaton in Mandriva 2006 and in Mandriva 2006.1 as well.
By and large Mandriva is a very good distribution, but not as polished as PCLinuxOS. To me PCLinuxOS 0.92 is what Mandriva should have developed into.
When I had Mandriva on the PC, it was not used as my main operating system, Windows XP was.
Mainly because I hadn't figured out how to get the printer working under Mandriva. I now know how to get my printer and Speedtouch usb Modem working under both Mandriva and PCLInuxOS 0.92
PCLinuxOS is now used as my main operating system, instead of Windows XP, something I never imagined would happen when using Mandriva.
PCLinuxOS was originally based on Mandrake 9.2, so yes it is as easy to use.
It reads NTFS partitions, whilst it can read and write to Fat32 partitions in the same way as Mandriva.
Updates using synaptic are more regular than in Mandriva and I haven't had any KDE crash screens so far, which I had when trying Mandriva One.
I also got a KDE crash screens when trying to use Noaton in Mandriva 2006 and in Mandriva 2006.1 as well.
By and large Mandriva is a very good distribution, but not as polished as PCLinuxOS. To me PCLinuxOS 0.92 is what Mandriva should have developed into.
When I had Mandriva on the PC, it was not used as my main operating system, Windows XP was.
Mainly because I hadn't figured out how to get the printer working under Mandriva. I now know how to get my printer and Speedtouch usb Modem working under both Mandriva and PCLInuxOS 0.92
PCLinuxOS is now used as my main operating system, instead of Windows XP, something I never imagined would happen when using Mandriva.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.