LQ Suggestions & FeedbackDo you have a suggestion for this site or an idea that will make the site better? This forum is for you.
PLEASE READ THIS FORUM - Information and status updates will also be posted here.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Is there is some kind of feature like this, so no one is replying to a problem that has already been solved? I haven't seen anything like this but it sounds like a good idea to add a feature like this.
This question has been asked many times in the past. IMO, the basic problem with doing something like this is that a solution that works for one person may not work for another (due to hardware differences, distros differences, etc) and consequently any sort of "Solved" indicator would be unreliable. That would be frustrating in the extreme to any future readers, and likewise would seem to imply that all the other threads on the same topic were therefore "Unsolved" and didn't contain any useful info at all. That would be completely untrue, and would cause a lot of LQ'ers to skip past threads that might contain answers that could work perfectly for them.
Fortunately however, this functionality already exists -- all it takes is for people to post a followup in the thread to indicate that a given suggestion resolved the problem. Anyone doing a Search here at LQ on a topic is likely to read through the threads on the issue they are searching on, and seeing a reply from the OP indicating that a given suggestion worked would be a major bonus plus it would be courteous. -- J.W.
Instead of marking the thread, how about providing the threadstarter the option of marking a post "accepted answer" or something like that (not original, I admit)
Since it is apparantly sometimes too much to ask to post a follow-up, perhaps simply clicking on the post would at least let the poster know his solution worked for the thread starter (even if the solution may not work for all)
there's just so little benefit from this i can't see why it would realistically be worth it. the whole excepted answer thing works on expertsexchange, but LQ is totally different.
If your problem is solved, just respond with a message saying so. Perhaps which solution you used would be useful for someone reading the messages in the future after using the search feature.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.