LinuxQuestions.org
Help answer threads with 0 replies.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > LinuxQuestions.org > LQ Suggestions & Feedback
User Name
Password
LQ Suggestions & Feedback Do you have a suggestion for this site or an idea that will make the site better? This forum is for you.
PLEASE READ THIS FORUM - Information and status updates will also be posted here.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 07-29-2007, 04:46 PM   #16
berbae
Member
 
Registered: Jul 2005
Location: France
Distribution: Arch Linux
Posts: 540

Rep: Reputation: Disabled

Thanks Jeremy for having found the culprit ad with the evil javascript.
This event has made me now more worried about possible vulnerabilities with scripts execution
when surfing the web.
I trust LQ for the security and privacy, but I don't know what can happened at other sites,
especially if an evil javascript does more invisible things as the one encountered here.
So I decided to install the NoScript extension for Firefox from now on, to feel safer on the web.
Thanks again for the quick solution you've found.
 
Old 07-29-2007, 05:14 PM   #17
colucix
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Sep 2003
Location: Bologna
Distribution: CentOS 6.5 OpenSuSE 12.3
Posts: 10,509

Rep: Reputation: 1983Reputation: 1983Reputation: 1983Reputation: 1983Reputation: 1983Reputation: 1983Reputation: 1983Reputation: 1983Reputation: 1983Reputation: 1983Reputation: 1983
Thank you, Jeremy. Your kind words make me proud to be part of this community.
 
Old 07-29-2007, 11:50 PM   #18
jiml8
Senior Member
 
Registered: Sep 2003
Posts: 3,171

Rep: Reputation: 116Reputation: 116
Oh, come on! That ad is a public service! I'm sure that all the linux users visiting this site welcome the opportunity to have a free virus scan of their computer performed!

As an aside, using a plugin to disable javascript isn't necessarily a good plan; some sites won't work right without javascript. I myself generally try to avoid using javascript, but sometimes my clients make me do it.

I use privoxy and then I can tailor exactly what javascript functions I will permit to work. Thus I prevent popups (and, usually, any ads at all) yet still allow things like form validation.
 
Old 07-30-2007, 04:13 AM   #19
blackhole54
Senior Member
 
Registered: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,896

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 61
Quote:
Originally Posted by jiml8
Oh, come on! That ad is a public service! I'm sure that all the linux users visiting this site welcome the opportunity to have a free virus scan of their computer performed!
I realize you are being sarcastic. And the "free virus scan" probably would do no harm to a Linux computer (if you could even run it). But I would not assume that the result would be benign for a computer running MS.

Quote:
As an aside, using a plugin to disable javascript isn't necessarily a good plan; some sites won't work right without javascript. I myself generally try to avoid using javascript, but sometimes my clients make me do it.

I use privoxy and then I can tailor exactly what javascript functions I will permit to work. Thus I prevent popups (and, usually, any ads at all) yet still allow things like form validation.
I use privoxy and on most websites I leave java script disabled. Privoxy has useful filtering rules built in. But to use privoxy with the kind of flexibility you seem to be implying requires a knowledge of javascript (and "pearl style" regular expressions!) that some of us don't possess. So I don't think I would discourage people from using the noscript plugin. (I don't use it myself since I generally don't use FireFox as a browser.) Using both would not be a bad idea.

EDIT: Note that you can set the noscript plugin to differing levels of blocking for different websites.

Last edited by blackhole54; 07-30-2007 at 04:17 AM.
 
Old 07-30-2007, 07:02 AM   #20
colucix
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Sep 2003
Location: Bologna
Distribution: CentOS 6.5 OpenSuSE 12.3
Posts: 10,509

Rep: Reputation: 1983Reputation: 1983Reputation: 1983Reputation: 1983Reputation: 1983Reputation: 1983Reputation: 1983Reputation: 1983Reputation: 1983Reputation: 1983Reputation: 1983
We (users) can afford everything to avoid the exploiting of malicious scripts on our systems, but this not solve the problem from a site administration point of view. I guess (I only guess, not speaking for them) the LQ staff is mostly concerned to keep things clean, doing everything is in their power or control.
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
malicious script in tmp - (cpanel/fc4) ddaas Linux - Security 6 09-25-2017 05:01 PM
Is this firewall script safe? eponymous Linux - Security 26 01-20-2007 06:00 PM
Wanted: Batch Email Script for Snapfish photo-uploads mpm Linux - Software 1 05-28-2006 11:48 PM
Malicious Script jspsandhu Linux - General 12 09-29-2005 05:05 PM
safe script parameters Guttorm Programming 1 03-04-2005 12:19 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > LinuxQuestions.org > LQ Suggestions & Feedback

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:45 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration