LQ Suggestions & FeedbackDo you have a suggestion for this site or an idea that will make the site better? This forum is for you.
PLEASE READ THIS FORUM - Information and status updates will also be posted here.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Posting this here as the forum lacks PM functionality. After engaging one mod it still went nowhere. I suppose we will discuss it here then.
There is a user who responds to my EVERY post with condescending remarks usually devoid of much substance which amount to "You should have looked it up" and all permutations of that, usually highlighting my alleged delinquency or irresponsibility or errors in some way. The user, not surprisingly with a high post count is not playing with a full deck when it comes to respectful social online interaction using his higher reputation number and post count as a shield.
It's basically harassing and I am officially requesting for this to stop as the participation in the community is becoming increasingly difficult. I've engaged the ignore feature but it still shows all users who reply to a particular thread so it's not of much help.
If you can make that disappear that would certainly help.
There is another even simpler solution, if I can put you on ignore, you can put me on ignore so the problem stays solved. Respectfully yours.
P.S. If you can't fix / resolve it, just delete my account and I will find a new home elsewhere. Maybe 20 years here is enough.
Maybe contact another moderator for assistance. If that gets you no where, contact an administrator and if that goes no where, contact the owner/s of the forum. Be sure to name names of those you previously contacted and gave no help or assistance in the matter.
AFAIK LQ does have PM functionality, tho there are some limitations, as I recall.
To contact “the powers that be,” use the Contact Us link found at the bottom of every page.
Another option: putting a user on your ignore list (see the Edit Options link) suppresses the display of that user’s posts for you. You can see that they posted, but what they posted is hidden. I find it quite useful for preventing me from becoming irritated by what “those idiots” say. I do run the risk of missing useful information, should such actually happen, but it’s my choice.
I’ll note that the moderators, like everyone else here, are volunteers.
Edit: Oh. I see in another thread that you’re already using the ignore list. “…the risk of missing useful information…”. Note that one can choose to view an ignored post if that’s a concern.
I can guess who this refers to! The person concerned is very knowledgeable about Linux, which is why they have acquired a high reputation on the forum, but also with a rather testy manner. In most cases where someone has been put down, it was because they did not simply carry out the suggested diagnostic operations and report the results, which would have made it easier for other people to help them.
LQ is not a search engine, and if you check the rules you can find the following:
Quote:
Before posting, have you used the search function to ensure your question hasn't been asked before?
From this point of view: you were asked to do a basic research to find the answer yourself instead of waiting for others to do the job for you. Additionally that will be much faster (do not need to wait for others). You also got two links, so the answer is there, you just need to read that.
You're not being "stalked" - you've simply asked a few ill researched questions and have gotten a few sharp responses. Now you seem to be making so much drama of it. Your obvious solution was to use the ignore list - so you used the ignore list, then you used "click here..." to view the posts anyway and made and uploaded screenshots - and asked them to ignore you. They refused to play it your way, so you made this thread. Seems like a lot of unnecessary drama about nothing at all.
Last edited by _blackhole_; 10-11-2023 at 09:15 AM.
Reason: reworded for clarity...
Yes this is a temperance lecture, as a fellow LQ member, no official moderator intentions.
A perspective I try to explain to people:
Quote:
Your ignore list is within your mind and attention, not some piece of technology you need to rely on
This is all not about another user's behavior, instead it is about how you let this bother you.
The internet is not new, online forums are not new, you've been on LQ for nearly 20 years, odds are that you've experienced things like StackExchange or the old BBS's. My point is people can be jerks online and a lot of times it's borderline where a person offers help but may do so with admonishments or worse. Or you may not understand their offering of help and feel it is a putdown, or finally you really may have asked a poor question. The first thing/feeling I learned years ago was that I didn't want to ask an obvious klinker, in fact you'd get taught that on many forums. So I made sure I prepared my question with good background. That led to me asking very few real questions, because I asked them to myself, looked up possible information to support it, and found that many of my questions became self answered in advance.
Still it is very possible people will have questions and that's fine.
I feel there may be benefit to viewing all advice and then making your own judgment whether or not you feel it helps you to move ahead on your problem. And if you find a reply where you feel it is worthless, then don't let it bother you, just move on.
Yes this is a temperance lecture, as a fellow LQ member, no official moderator intentions.
A perspective I try to explain to people:This is all not about another user's behavior, instead it is about how you let this bother you.
The internet is not new, online forums are not new, you've been on LQ for nearly 20 years, odds are that you've experienced things like StackExchange or the old BBS's. My point is people can be jerks online and a lot of times it's borderline where a person offers help but may do so with admonishments or worse. Or you may not understand their offering of help and feel it is a putdown, or finally you really may have asked a poor question. The first thing/feeling I learned years ago was that I didn't want to ask an obvious klinker, in fact you'd get taught that on many forums. So I made sure I prepared my question with good background. That led to me asking very few real questions, because I asked them to myself, looked up possible information to support it, and found that many of my questions became self answered in advance.
Still it is very possible people will have questions and that's fine.
I feel there may be benefit to viewing all advice and then making your own judgment whether or not you feel it helps you to move ahead on your problem. And if you find a reply where you feel it is worthless, then don't let it bother you, just move on.
Interesting point you make
I have been in IT for a long time, actually I touched my first Unix box exactly 30 years ago, when DEC was still kind of big, scary how time flies. Then I did HP and Solaris for the longest time. I did not want to, but contracts just kept coming up.
When you do sysadmin professionally, get bitten by every conceivable type of crocodile.
I get irritated when some Linux Larva like TBone try to educate me who weren't even born yet (or so it seems) when I was already recompiling kernels on the "real thing" and writing assembler code and separate compilation and much other stuff. I did Unix for about 20 years, Linux for considerably less, probably 5-7 in sum. A lot of sysadmins had to transition from the "real" Unix to the cheaper "aftermarket" replacement, sigh.
What I learned, is that IT is fundamentally about people, processes, not command-line interface and options.
From what I have seen in the IT industry, having an Asperger personality disorder which manifests itself here at times actually immensely helps with the career, because perfectly normal people can't really deal with the workload and the tediousness of it. You cant' be normal and still grok this stuff. So, not a huge surprise.
[removed]
I have been in IT for a long time, actually I touched my first Unix box exactly 30 years ago, when DEC was still kind of big, scary how time flies. Then I did HP and Solaris for the longest time. I did not want to, but contracts just kept coming up.
When you do sysadmin professionally, get bitten by every conceivable type of crocodile.
I get irritated when some Linux Larva like TBone try to educate me who weren't even born yet (or so it seems) when I was already recompiling kernels on the "real thing" and writing assembler code and separate compilation and much other stuff. I did Unix for about 20 years, Linux for considerably less, probably 5-7 in sum. A lot of sysadmins had to transition from the "real" Unix to the cheaper "aftermarket" replacement, sigh.
What I learned, is that IT is fundamentally about people, processes, not command-line interface and options.
From what I have seen in the IT industry, having an Asperger personality disorder which manifests itself here at times actually immensely helps with the career, because perfectly normal people can't really deal with the workload and the tediousness of it. You cant' be normal and still grok this stuff. So, not a huge surprise.
[removed]
I don't care how much experience you (or anyone else) has with hp or anything else. It's not important at all. What really matters is how you (or anyone else) communicate and use this forum. TBone doesn't teach about kernel compilation, but teaches about participating in such a forum.
I have been in IT for a long time, actually I touched my first Unix box exactly 30 years ago, when DEC was still kind of big, scary how time flies. Then I did HP and Solaris for the longest time. I did not want to, but contracts just kept coming up. When you do sysadmin professionally, get bitten by every conceivable type of crocodile.
I get irritated when some Linux Larva like TBone try to educate me who weren't even born yet (or so it seems) when I was already recompiling kernels on the "real thing" and writing assembler code and separate compilation and much other stuff. I did Unix for about 20 years, Linux for considerably less, probably 5-7 in sum. A lot of sysadmins had to transition from the "real" Unix to the cheaper "aftermarket" replacement, sigh. What I learned, is that IT is fundamentally about people, processes, not command-line interface and options.
From what I have seen in the IT industry, having an Asperger personality disorder which manifests itself here at times actually immensely helps with the career, because perfectly normal people can't really deal with the workload and the tediousness of it. You cant' be normal and still grok this stuff. So, not a huge surprise.
I got to find a better way to manage the smart and aspie retard children, LOL.
Good for you...and I've been working with *nix even longer than 30 years. And if you've got so much experience, it's hard to understand why you never apply any of it, based on what you post. Nor is it easy to understand why you can't be bothered to even ATTEMPT to do research of your own.
Rather than whining about how people aren't 'nice' to you, why don't you try doing some of these things yourself??? Why do you ask us to look things up for you (FIPS? ATO? Offline repositories?)? You seem to just want to put your hand out...and if you want to call someone names, I certainly think the labels you throw out apply in your case.
next time you decide to assign me an infraction, just go ahead and skip intermediate measures and delete my entire account. I would do it myself if I could figure out how to.
Since you can't self-evidently deal with the above person stalking my posts and generating unwanted dialog with captive audience.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
