LQ Suggestions & FeedbackDo you have a suggestion for this site or an idea that will make the site better? This forum is for you.
PLEASE READ THIS FORUM - Information and status updates will also be posted here.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
When im under HCL -> I/O devices -> Logitech and make a new post, and after posting click the "path" object Logitech to get back to the category, I get a no items available page (http://www.linuxquestions.org/hcl/showcat.php?cat=4410) This is pretty logic taking that the category 4410 diesnt exist and Logitech is actually 441.. Sofar for the two posts ive made there the problem has reocurred, but if not having just posted, there is no such problem and the page=2 variable is also passed along.
edit: oh yeah, using the Slackware official build of Firefox 1.0.6
I understand that, but what I dont, is that what has it got to do with the link leading out of there? (: Surely the Logitech category a a whole has been approved allready? (;
Mm.. I first got it when posted to the Logitech MX700 HCL thread, and then the second time when I posted the Cordless Click! Plus mouse.. So, sofar it has only occured on the page, right after submitting the posts. Dont have much more logitech hardware to submit, so cant realy test it again.. (;
btw: I could not post the review for the HL-DT-ST GSA-4163B because the 'Post review' link was missing. After figuring the correct url to follow (based on the other links) i was able to do it. If it was intentional and I was not allowed to post, then sorry .
Actually no, I hadn't looked at that link. I did try the HCL Entries link on several posts and the links I had tried did not have any listings. Thanks for pointing out that HCL stands for Hardware Compatibility List. That makes it very clear.
Originally posted by jlgreer1 Actually no, I hadn't looked at that link. I did try the HCL Entries link on several posts and the links I had tried did not have any listings. Thanks for pointing out that HCL stands for Hardware Compatibility List. That makes it very clear.
Jeff
Yeah, the HCL Entires link will literally show you nothing unless you have actual HCL entries submitted, so it's kind of decieving at first.
The problem seems to still be around, this time ive got a sure match for ye to poke upon.. (; When I access the rewiew via a _direct_ link like the one from the mail sent when the product is reviewed or when youve just created the product page, the problem comes up with the upper category link being trailed with a extra 0.. Heres a straight link: http://www.linuxquestions.org/hcl/sh...p?product=2944
Do notice where the 'logitech' link is leading. All the other links seem fine tho.. But,. if accessing the article normally by bowsing around the HCL, the link which thru you end to the product is http://www.linuxquestions.org/hcl/sh...cat=441&page=1
So, the category actually is passed along. So, my wild guess is that the product goes haywire when it doesnt get the cat passed along as some rare events cause it to be looked upon.. However, this doesnt seem to be the case as I tested http://www.linuxquestions.org/hcl/sh...t=2944&cat=441 with the same ill results.
So, by trial and error I tested all the combinations and it seems both variables cat=441&page=1 need to be passed along or the link will point odd..
Distribution: Debian, Red Hat, Slackware, Fedora, Ubuntu
Posts: 13,602
Rep:
Artanicus, we're working on an HCL and Reviews code update that should significantly clean things like this up. Those upgrades should be rolled out with the upcoming forum upgrades.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.