DISCUSSION: Compiling kernel 2.6.10 on a Slackware 10.1
LinuxAnswers DiscussionThis forum is to discuss articles posted to LinuxAnswers.
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Introduction to Linux - A Hands on Guide
This guide was created as an overview of the Linux Operating System, geared toward new users as an exploration tour and getting started guide, with exercises at the end of each chapter.
For more advanced trainees it can be a desktop reference, and a collection of the base knowledge needed to proceed with system and network administration. This book contains many real life examples derived from the author's experience as a Linux system and network administrator, trainer and consultant. They hope these examples will help you to get a better understanding of the Linux system and that you feel encouraged to try out things on your own.
Click Here to receive this Complete Guide absolutely free.
Hey, just read your article to see how similar your experience was to mine.
You say to delete the /usr/src/linux symlink and replace it with one pointing to the new source. This is BAD!! According to linus /usr/src/linux should point to the kernel headers that glibc was compiled against, not those of the running kernel.
Programs will still link (or whatever) to the right headers because they will use uname -r to find the right directory, i.e.:
Originally posted by hameedkhan
Thanks for your guide. One thing that I really didn't understand is why do we need /sys? What if I'll not make this dir? Will my kernel not work? What is the use of this dir?
Hameed U. Khan
Starting with kernel 2.6 there's a new /sys directory for Plug and Play configuration. upgrading from previous versions of the kernel, you might therefore not have it there.
I've just built 188.8.131.52 using a similar method, reiserfs, SATA and all (we have very similar setups).
I'm running an AMD64 3500+ (on an nVidiva nForce 3-based motherboard) and recently tried to install an app that was designed for x86_64, which is my system, right?
For some reason the program (nVidia motherboard drivers) reports that this is really a 32 bit kernel. Did I forget to check something off when I built it, or should I have built a different target (like `make bzImage x86_64` or something)?
Originally posted by r_x this was cool...............
i upgraded my slack box from 2.4.29 to 184.108.40.206 .............
add that 1 more step in the end...................removing the old kernel when the new one fires up
yes u can do that but i personlly do not recommend that
ther is not harm in keeping a kernel or 2 extra in stock,in case u find on later that u have something missing u can just boot in the other kernel and check there
This is a great guild for Slackware newbies , I have a question though : if I took the optional steps which remove all the symbolic links
linking to the old kernel , and then link them to the new one , does it
still make sense to make an entry for the old kernel when configuring LILO ?
Once again , great work and it's much appreciated .