LinuxAnswers DiscussionThis forum is to discuss articles posted to LinuxAnswers.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Could you explain how doing a low-level format "could
damage newer (pretty much anything over 512MB) drives."
I have used utilities from Maxtor, Seagate, and IBM to do
low-level formats on drives for at least 7 years, and have
never had a single problem. And I've never even seen a
drive of 512MB or under.
In fact, there are at least 4 drives in computers we're
using every day, which are under 3 years old, and all
40GB or above, which have had more than one low-
level format -- and they're all just fine.
Let me explain.
Nowadays, usually when people say "low-level format" they really mean "zero-fill". Consequently, many zero-fill utilities are mistakenly called "low-level format" utilities. Low-level formatting is when you restore the drive to its original shipping state and overwrite the drive's internal programming that tells the drive how to function.
On older drives, since they were so much less complex (they didn't have S.M.A.R.T., transparent bad sector detection, or a multitude of other features newer drives have), they could all be low-level formatted using the same utility.
Not so with newer drives. On newer drives, a true low-level format is something that can only be done with utilities from the manufacturer. Using a utility on a drive other than the one it's intended for will destroy the drive.
Read the middle paragraph of my post again. I regularly use Maxtor's PowerMax 4.22 to low-level format drives. Did it yesterday. Yes, low-level format, as provided by Maxtor, vs. writing the drive to zeroes.
Read the middle paragraph of my post again. I regularly use Maxtor's PowerMax 4.22 to low-level format drives. Did it yesterday. Yes, low-level format, as provided by Maxtor, vs. writing the drive to zeroes.
"Writing the drive to zeroes" is called a ZERO-FILL. Sometimes people mistakenly call it a low-level format but it is not, in fact, a low-level format. If all it's doing is writing zeros, then it's doing a ZERO-FILL.
Now if you're using Maxtor drives, then you might be able to do a true low-level format on the drives using this utility.
I don't mistakenly call a low-level format writing zeroes to the drive.
And I use utilities to do this all the time.
And I've never damaged a disk doing it.
And the manufacturer's have required/suggested it before returning drives under RMA.
And I've been doing this for better than a decade -- on more than just Maxtor drives.
Distribution: openSuSE Tumbleweed-KDE, Mint 21, MX-21, Manjaro
Posts: 4,629
Rep:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chinaman
...And I've been doing this for better than a decade -- on more than just Maxtor drives.
Umm, on their website it is not really clear -- so, did you use the CD-utility without a pre-existing windows installation just with Linux, or is that impossible?
The reason I ask is, I have three Maxtor drives but I scratched my WinNT some time ago. So, if I experience trouble, do I have to do a re-install or could I work just from CD, keeping my installation(s)?
I recommend DBAN (Darik's Boot and Nuke) as a convenient data shredder and zero-fill program. It removes all partitions, data, programs, master boot records--everything--from every brand and capacity of disk I've tried. It can simply zero-fill or it can overwrite old data multiple times for security. It boots from either a floppy or a CD and is available for free download here:
did you use the CD-utility without a pre-existing windows installation just with Linux, or is that impossible?
...
could I work just from CD, keeping my installation(s)?
The CD that comes with retail Maxtor hard drives is bootable. You don't need Linux or Windows installed to use it. Of course, if you zero-fill the hard drive, anything you have installed on that drive is destroyed. If you need to keep an installation (or anything else) on the hard drive, do NOT zero-fill it. If you only want to erase the contents of one partition while keeping another intact, simply reformat the unwanted partition.
Umm, on their website it is not really clear -- so, did you use the CD-utility without a pre-existing windows installation just with Linux, or is that impossible?
The reason I ask is, I have three Maxtor drives but I scratched my WinNT some time ago. So, if I experience trouble, do I have to do a re-install or could I work just from CD, keeping my installation(s)?
I don't really understand your question. In order to use the Maxtor utilities, it is not necessary to have a Windows installation on the drive -- now or ever before. Just boot with their CD and follow the instructions.
My point that seems to have generated controversy and lack of understanding by some in this thread was never whether someone needs or should use low-level formatting, or writing a drive to zeros with the manufacturer's utilities -- versus using the dd command. I was countering FUD that said it would void the manufacturer's warranty to do a low-level format, when I have had the manufacturer tell me to do so before returning a drive with a RMA number.
The dd command works great, and I use it all the time. There is a pretty comprehensive tutorial here on LQ titled Learn the DD command. The thread is a good read.
Distribution: openSuSE Tumbleweed-KDE, Mint 21, MX-21, Manjaro
Posts: 4,629
Rep:
Ups, we're posting in a tight schedule here, it seems .
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chinaman
I don't really understand your question. In order to use the Maxtor utilities, it is not necessary to have a Windows installation on the drive -- now or ever before. Just boot with their CD and follow the instructions.
I shouldn't get so piqued over stuff like that ... guess it comes from me blinding following advice from forums, especially when the poster was labeled "guru" when I first started using Linux. Hosed a few installs and lost some data in those days.
And just in case someone didn't know, if they desired to use such a utility the manufacturer's almost all offer them as free downloads -- with instructions. When you have a drive that has only had Windoze on it, it's quicker and more efficient to use those utilities rather than a Linux Live CD. There are ways with dd that you can 'cook the goose' -- whereas with a utility from a drive manufacturer it's pretty simple just to read and follow the menus.
You said: Anyone can post something on the internet, which does not make it a fact.
I guess there is no practical use for this forum then. I will quit it. You are free to have mt posts removed.
Low Level Formats were used on the OLD MFM, RLL, ESDI and SCSI drives, but todays drive are truly low level formated at the factory and the low level information is writen into the hard drive firmware permanently. SCSI also has never done a true low level format either, because the SCSI controller is just a Bus as well, but at least they had a standard for how to write all zeros which many "controller" card BIOS's called "Low Level"
MFM RLL and ESDI, these drives had seperate controllers which actually delt with the movent of the drive and the drives geometry. So if you changed controllers you usally had to redoo the low level format again as well (Deboug g=c800:5 (for those that remember))When IDE came out the contorller was built in with the drive, the low level format which sets the Interleave and records the bad spots, etc, was done at the factory and permenantly stored in firmware. Hince the term "Integrated Device Electronics" The IDE Controller is just a BUS, the stuff that used to be on the controller was now built into the drive. The average user canot low level format a drive. However in order to make everyone feel better most of the hard drive makers came out with a "low level format" utility that is really just writing all zero's to the drive and doing some read/write testing and maybe some stuff propreitary to that Manufacurer. I am sure that if you could find some majical way to do a true low level format then you would probably screw something up pretty bad, but that is impossible because the IDE bus is just a BUS, not a true conrtoller like in the old days.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.