LinuxQuestions.org
Did you know LQ has a Linux Hardware Compatibility List?
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Virtualization and Cloud
User Name
Password
Linux - Virtualization and Cloud This forum is for the discussion of all topics relating to Linux Virtualization and Linux Cloud platforms. Xen, KVM, OpenVZ, VirtualBox, VMware, Linux-VServer and all other Linux Virtualization platforms are welcome. OpenStack, CloudStack, ownCloud, Cloud Foundry, Eucalyptus, Nimbus, OpenNebula and all other Linux Cloud platforms are welcome. Note that questions relating solely to non-Linux OS's should be asked in the General forum.

Notices

Reply
 
Search this Thread
Old 04-26-2010, 03:10 PM   #1
HellesAngel
Member
 
Registered: Jun 2007
Posts: 84

Rep: Reputation: 15
Using virtualisation to reduce power consumption. Will it work?


In my home network the principle file server does not run permanently as it draws a lot of power, primarily as it has a lot of hard disks. This is inconvenient and I'm wondering if I can use VMware ESXi based virtual machines to control the power consumption by only mounting the disks that are needed but leave the host running 24/7.

The 'server' is a Core2 Duo machine based around a Linux software raid array (mdadm RAID5) with four Samsung F1 1Gb eco-green active disks and one spare, with yet another 1Gb disk for backups of the important data. The machine boots from yet another disk. The plan is to have one 'NAS' VM that mounts the 4+1 RAID5 array, another backup VM that mounts the backup disk, and then have only the boot disk permanently mounted. The host will run permanently and the virtual machines will boot when needed and shut down when not. The RAID and backup disks will only be mounted by the virtual machines that 'own' them.

My questions are - will this save any power? ie. will the disks sleep if not mounted? Normally I use SUSE Linux but is another distribution better, Debian always seems to be the Server distribution of choice but possibly not because it has the best power saving possibilities. With virtual machines it's possible to run scripts on startup/shutdown but is it possible to force disks in and out of sleep?

I have a moderate understanding of Linux, mdadm and VMware but no idea if this plan can be made to work. Thanks in advance for any suggestions.
 
Old 04-26-2010, 03:39 PM   #2
MS3FGX
Guru
 
Registered: Jan 2004
Location: NJ, USA
Distribution: Slackware, Debian
Posts: 5,852

Rep: Reputation: 351Reputation: 351Reputation: 351Reputation: 351
Perhaps I am not understanding what you are trying to do, but I can't see any way that VMs would help you or have anything to do with this. Why can't you simply put the drives to sleep from the primary OS?
 
Old 04-26-2010, 07:51 PM   #3
dunix
Member
 
Registered: Nov 2009
Location: Vermont
Distribution: Slackware, RHEL/CentOS, Fedora
Posts: 40

Rep: Reputation: 18
What about suspending the machine at night via cron then wake-on-lan in the morning or just hitting the power button to wake it.
 
Old 04-27-2010, 02:32 AM   #4
catkin
LQ 5k Club
 
Registered: Dec 2008
Location: Tamil Nadu, India
Distribution: Servers: Debian Squeeze and Wheezy. Desktop: Slackware64 14.0. Netbook: Slackware 13.37
Posts: 8,551
Blog Entries: 28

Rep: Reputation: 1176Reputation: 1176Reputation: 1176Reputation: 1176Reputation: 1176Reputation: 1176Reputation: 1176Reputation: 1176Reputation: 1176
Are you sure "the principle file server ... draws a lot of power, primarily as it has a lot of hard disks"?

When idle, a typical single HDD computer uses ~100 W of which each HDD is using ~5 W so ~95 W are being used, mostly by chipset, CPU, memory, GPU -- doing nothing!

In the case of your file server, 6 "green" HDDs are using ~20 W when idle. Let's assume the chipset, CPU, memory and GPU are using the same ~95 W doing nothing. Even if you completely removed power from the HDDs you would only save ~20 W. Considering environmental impact, powering off the drives might actually be worse because:
  • Power/thermal cycling reduces the life of HDDs
  • Most environmental impact associated with computer components is in manufacture and distribution (Wikipedia); power consumption during active life is a relatively small part of it; the best environmental impact minimisation strategy is therefore to prolong component life.
So yes -- virtualising your file server can save electricity and reduce environmental impact, not by switching HDDs on and off but by using only one instead of two computer's power-hungry chipset, CPU, memory and GPU.
 
Old 04-27-2010, 06:38 AM   #5
HellesAngel
Member
 
Registered: Jun 2007
Posts: 84

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 15
Thanks for the information - it's true that the disks are only a part of the power consumption total but it's a part that's controllable. The rest is largely up to the BIOS and there I have to work with what I've got. We can separate environmental impact (in the entirety of the topic) from power consumption and at the moment I'm concerned with power. Hard disk life is also measured in hours of use and running disks 24/7 also degrades them.

To other points: the machine sits in the cellar so there's no easy access to the power button. Currently it wakes on LAN and this works well enough in simple cases, but it is still inconvenient and a bit clunky.

The reasons I'm thinking about virtualisation is first and foremost I will have ESXi running on the machine anyway to virtualise an IPCop firewall that must run 24/7. Secondly I'd like to cleanly separate the various different tasks the machine will do - classic virtualisation.

My question is about how this could assist saving power. If the disks are only mounted when the VM to which they are attached is running will they shut off automatically when the VM shuts down? If not automatically how is it done manually?

I've no experience with Linux power saving measures, I just remember hearing they're a bit stone age when compared to some other operating systems. Google searches throw up a lot of noise but perhaps I'm just searching for the wrong stuff.

Thanks for any help.
 
Old 04-27-2010, 08:48 AM   #6
catkin
LQ 5k Club
 
Registered: Dec 2008
Location: Tamil Nadu, India
Distribution: Servers: Debian Squeeze and Wheezy. Desktop: Slackware64 14.0. Netbook: Slackware 13.37
Posts: 8,551
Blog Entries: 28

Rep: Reputation: 1176Reputation: 1176Reputation: 1176Reputation: 1176Reputation: 1176Reputation: 1176Reputation: 1176Reputation: 1176Reputation: 1176
hdparm's -B and -S options may be useful
 
  


Reply

Tags
esxi, power, saving, virtualization, vmware


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
ways to reduce desktop power consumption? mma8x Linux - Hardware 7 11-30-2009 12:12 PM
LXer: Reduce Linux power consumption LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 09-17-2009 12:20 AM
LXer: Reduce Linux Power Consumption with PowerTop LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 08-13-2008 06:41 AM
Sleep mode for server to reduce power consumption Boffy Linux - Server 1 07-26-2008 05:01 AM
SUSE- reduce ram consumption MTBer Linux - Software 7 04-14-2006 10:21 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:17 PM.

Main Menu
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration