Linux - Virtualization and CloudThis forum is for the discussion of all topics relating to Linux Virtualization and Linux Cloud platforms. Xen, KVM, OpenVZ, VirtualBox, VMware, Linux-VServer and all other Linux Virtualization platforms are welcome. OpenStack, CloudStack, ownCloud, Cloud Foundry, Eucalyptus, Nimbus, OpenNebula and all other Linux Cloud platforms are welcome. Note that questions relating solely to non-Linux OS's should be asked in the General forum.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Location: Montreal, Quebec and Dartmouth, Nova Scotia CANADA
Distribution: Arch, AntiX, ArtiX
Posts: 1,364
Rep:
Hi nejnej25,
I would recommend a 3rd alternative: Virtualbox. Second choice for me would be VMWare. If you are using a Linux host (I assume you are, otherwise you wouldn't be asking your question on this particular forum ...), you can also try KVM with QEMM and libvirt. I have had experience with all 3 of these solutions, and they all work as advertised. I list them according to my perception of ease of use for an inexperienced user just starting to experiment with type 2 hypervisors (OS-dependant virtualization solutions).
I have only briefly heard of Proxmox so I can't offer any useful advice on it. However, there are members here that have experience with it - they may chime in.
I would recommend a 3rd alternative: Virtualbox. Second choice for me would be VMWare. If you are using a Linux host (I assume you are, otherwise you wouldn't be asking your question on this particular forum ...), you can also try KVM with QEMM and libvirt. I have had experience with all 3 of these solutions, and they all work as advertised. I list them according to my perception of ease of use for an inexperienced user just starting to experiment with type 2 hypervisors (OS-dependant virtualization solutions).
I have only briefly heard of Proxmox so I can't offer any useful advice on it. However, there are members here that have experience with it - they may chime in.
Cheers and good luck.
Hi, thanks for your input. Well I used VirtualBox everyday because I run my VM guests OS on it. I just want to learn type 1 virtualization for me to upgrade my skills and so I can use it in work/industry. I'm confused about the two but I found first the VMWare because I thinks its the most popular virtualization in an enterprise?
Location: Montreal, Quebec and Dartmouth, Nova Scotia CANADA
Distribution: Arch, AntiX, ArtiX
Posts: 1,364
Rep:
Hey nejnej25,
Ah - OK - so you're looking for Type 1 (bare-metal) hypervisors (these don't require an operating system before installing on a server whereas as Type 2 does).
VMWare VSPhere / ESXi, Microsoft HyperV and Xen / Citrix XenServer are the 3 enterprise-level Type 1 hypervisor solutions I've come across most often in my career. Can't help you with usage as I've never actually experimented with them personally.
Ah - OK - so you're looking for Type 1 (bare-metal) hypervisors (these don't require an operating system before installing on a server whereas as Type 2 does).
VMWare VSPhere / ESXi, Microsoft HyperV and Xen / Citrix XenServer are the 3 enterprise-level Type 1 hypervisor solutions I've come across most often in my career. Can't help you with usage as I've never actually experimented with them personally.
Cheers and good luck !
Yes exactly, is it good if I start first on VMWare? I think most of the companies rely on this virtual environment? Btw, thanks for the input sir!
Now, my experience is not extensive, but in the two enterprise environments I've worked in, I've seen VMWare. It seems, to me, to be the most prevalent bare metal virtualization solution out there.
I could be wrong. It's happened before, at least twice.
Part I. I will be upfront and say I have extensive VMware experience from small portable transient deployments to multi-site, datacenter, clusters, etc... The reason I have more VMware experience opposed to the other options is that under real time operational environments VMware has proven to out perform and is extremely reliable. That's not saying the other options are a bad choice, but when is comes to mission critical workloads, VMware is favorable.....
Part II. That does not mean VMware is difficult to setup or run, it's actually quite self explanatory. ESXi is what you will want as a bare metal hypervisor you can download it for free after signing up with an account. For a free type-1 hypervisor, it provides plenty of room to grow and learn until something larger is required. VMware also provides optional sdk's for managing your vSphere environment. There's a bit of VMware jargon to understand but it doesn't take long.... e.g. vSphere is not the actual hypervisor, vCenter manages the hypervisors, but the actual software you'll put onto a server is called ESXi. This has gone through many iterations over the years as far as the true distro behind it. Essentially their own customized build but was at some time a derivative of enterprise linux. My advice is, if you need a type 1 hypervisor to play with and test, download the free ESXi, you can even run it on a laptop is very simple.
There are many factors affecting a choice for use. Firstly is features. Some VM technology have some highly integrated hardware features. The software features are extensive and grow every day.
How you wish to interact with the clients is also a major issue. Some have almost no gui type interaction to some that are very gui oriented.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.