Linux - SoftwareThis forum is for Software issues.
Having a problem installing a new program? Want to know which application is best for the job? Post your question in this forum.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
One of the features of linux when I first started using it was that, unlike M$, an upgrade (however small or large) could be done without the necessity of "restarting your computer". IIRC I've done complete distro upgrades in the past without being asked to restart the computer to complete the upgrade. Now (with Mint at least) a restart is required for all but the most trivial of upgrades.
There were bragging rights for who had the longest uptime with some people running into years (I got over a year once).
Does anyone know of a distro that still conforms to that original Linux feature and can be upgraded without requiring a restart?
Same here, using Debian Stable. But I'll reboot when doing a dist-upgrade from one major release to the next (every couple years or so). There have been a few dist-upgrades where that really wasn't necessary, perhaps, but there have been three major changes since Sarge where I was more comfortable with doing a reboot. The change from grub to grub2 (would have been upsetting to find out rebooting was broken at some random time later on). The change from old style drive naming to newer style. The switch to systemd.
I move computers and drives and ram sticks around enough that I do plenty more reboots than that, and then there's power outages also.
Linux has has us rebooting for a long time. After a while they figured out a few ways to change without a reboot. You'd have to contact the Mint maintainers for why they are doing this. Either one of two reasons I'd think. One is they didn't want to bother writing a huge script to move stuff back and forth and test orrr there is some problem that they are trying to avoid or can't overcome easily.
I tend to dislike reboots and much prefer cold power cycles. When I update major things I like to do full power down and be sure it powers back up properly.
Reboot can be a good thing. I remember once I set up a FreeBSD server and walked away in a hurry. Weeks later it had to be rebooted ... guess what, it did not come up properly ...
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.