[SOLVED] lynx browser: how to whitelist cookies of eng wikipedia?
Linux - SoftwareThis forum is for Software issues.
Having a problem installing a new program? Want to know which application is best for the job? Post your question in this forum.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
lynx browser: how to whitelist cookies of eng wikipedia?
lynx.cfg file is exhaustive & bit intimidating. whenever i visit eng wikipedia, it asks for cookie permissions. how do i whitelist cookies for eng wikipedia? are there any articles which provide tips or guides for tweaking or features specific to lynx browser.
lynx.cfg file is exhaustive & bit intimidating. whenever i visit eng wikipedia, it asks for cookie permissions. how do i whitelist cookies for eng wikipedia? are there any articles which provide tips or guides for tweaking or features specific to lynx browser.
When you get the chance, please go through the documentation (i.e. manual page)
Code:
man lynx
lynx --help | less
Approach it as a reference document in which you can look up stuff as needed. The manual pages are neither guides nor tutorials but authoritative reference works, second only to the source code. It pays an excellent return on the effort to learn to at least be able to skim through them. They vary a lot in quality, some quite excellent others not so much, but all are informative and useful.
So you don't bother to read the documentation, but want someone else to read them for you,
yes, that is one way to put it.
Quote:
Originally Posted by TB0ne
and tell you what to type in??
yes, i am with a lot of imperfections...
i have always assumed config files are enough to know about package behaviour on linux.
obviously, i was wrong & stumped.
yes, this has provided opportunity to remind myself if i cant figure out anything in config files, MUST read atleast man pages (suggested by @Turbocapitalist) .....
Last edited by jindam vani; 09-26-2022 at 08:49 PM.
Reason: +turbo, somehow i was biased & concentrated on only 1 reply of TB0ne
yes, i am with a lot of imperfections...i have always assumed config files are enough to know about package behaviour on linux. obviously, i was wrong & stumped. yes, this has provided opportunity to remind myself if i cant figure out anything in config files, MUST read atleast man pages (suggested by @Turbocapitalist) .....
And you MUST read the documentation, and show your own effort. Asking people to read things FOR YOU, is plain rude...why can't you show your own efforts, to solve your own problems???
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.