Linux - SoftwareThis forum is for Software issues.
Having a problem installing a new program? Want to know which application is best for the job? Post your question in this forum.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Check to see it is a stable release.
Many already use KDE 3.2, I do not, I use GNOME and Fluxbox, but if Fedora has the rpm command available to it, use rpm -Uvh to install the packages.
yes FC1 using the rpm database and command, and thank I know howto use the i (instal) and U(upgrade). and yes it is stable version of kde3.2
May concern was to confirm may I go for it without any fearrrrrrrrrr
i updated the stock kde 3.1.4 under suse 9.0 to kde 3.2 a couple of weeks ago.
there were one or two small snags but in the end it worked out ok.
given that it's a fairly major update, i'd recommend you backup any important files, possibly even backing up your entire /home directory so that you can easily restore settings in the event of disaster.
i'd also recommend that you consult any distro-specific documentation - there were a couple of suse-specific issues that i had to resolve.
all told, kde 3.2 is a worthwhile upgrade - it seems slightly faster, looks much nicer and resolves one or two bugs that used to madden me with earlier versions..
the only downside is that i've lost some of the tight suse integration, but i'm not too worried about that.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.