LinuxQuestions.org
Latest LQ Deal: Latest LQ Deals
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Software
User Name
Password
Linux - Software This forum is for Software issues.
Having a problem installing a new program? Want to know which application is best for the job? Post your question in this forum.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 04-20-2005, 05:49 PM   #16
r0jaws
Member
 
Registered: Feb 2005
Location: Norfolk, UK
Distribution: Ubuntu
Posts: 40

Rep: Reputation: 15

Ok just to check, your 9200se is set up right?
have a look here
http://www.ausfx.com/forum/index.php/topic,1831.0.html
 
Old 04-20-2005, 07:18 PM   #17
mrGenixus
Member
 
Registered: Dec 2004
Location: Colorado, US
Distribution: gentoo, debian, ubuntu live gnome 2.10
Posts: 440

Rep: Reputation: 30
part of the problem is that you're using KDE. GNome on debian runns on my r3000z compaq latop better than windows does. LInux also multi-tasks better. also your RAM usage include the kernel cache, RAM being used to store programs that you've just run so that if you reopen them, they'll open quic cker and be more responsive.

I have a 1Gb of Ram, and actual usage is usually 100-200 Mb's but RAM IN USE tends to be 700-800 M, depending on what I"ve recently run.
 
Old 04-20-2005, 08:38 PM   #18
bigrigdriver
LQ Addict
 
Registered: Jul 2002
Location: East Centra Illinois, USA
Distribution: Debian stable
Posts: 5,908

Rep: Reputation: 356Reputation: 356Reputation: 356Reputation: 356
If, and I repeat, IF Linux is slower than windows, it's because your installation is more bloated than windows. It takes time to mount partitions and run the filesystem checks. The more there is to boot and check, the longer it takes.

You are using one of the largest distros (I don't want to say bloated. SuSE installs a lot of stuff. Some of it you need/want. Most you don't).

To speed up your system, remove the 'stuff' you don't want/don't need/won't use.
Remove aplications first; remove libraries last. Reason: if you try to remove libraries first, YaST will complain about applications which depend on those libraries. Remove the apps first, and YaST has few reasons to complain.

Remove language support for languages you can't read/speak/understand. Do you really need to see Chinese characters displayed in your web browser? Same question for other languages.

Basically, you probably chose the standard installation. Now, pare it down to a custom installation, keeping only what you need/want/expect to use.

Set up categories of 'stuff' to remove, and take them one at a time. Don't overload YaST. Take your time.

Remember: libraries LAST!

As your remove 'stuff', your boot time will decrease. My SuSE takes about 4 minutes to boot. My SourceMage takes about 10 seconds (for now, because I have a bunch to add yet). My first distro (OpenLinux, before the merger with SCO), took all of 29 seconds to boot into usable mode.

It's up to you. Trim the fat and decrease the boot time.
 
Old 04-30-2005, 03:11 PM   #19
liquidtenmilion
Member
 
Registered: May 2004
Location: South Carolina
Distribution: Slackware 11.0
Posts: 606

Rep: Reputation: 32
4 minutes to boot!!!!

WOW!! that is very bloated. If it takes longer than 30 seconds for me to boot up i start feaking out.
 
Old 05-25-2005, 12:44 AM   #20
carl0ski
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2004
Location: Melbourne, Victoria Australia
Distribution: Support those that support you :)
Posts: 872
Blog Entries: 12

Rep: Reputation: 30
Quote:
Originally posted by LegendBreath
lol sorry,

Windows XP, SuSE 9.2, Kernel 2.6, KDE 3.3.0
problem number 1
Beta version of KDE
and KDE 3.3 derivitives much bulkier & slower then 3.4 or 3.2.3.

and being a fellow AMD user the distros come with KDE that doesnt work as fast as those compiled by you on you AMD machine
this makes it easy if you wish to try it.
http://developer.kde.org/build/konstruct/
http://developer.kde.org/build/konst...stable.tar.bz2
 
Old 05-25-2005, 09:31 AM   #21
KimVette
Senior Member
 
Registered: Dec 2004
Location: Lee, NH
Distribution: OpenSUSE, CentOS, RHEL
Posts: 1,794

Rep: Reputation: 46
Bah.

I dual boot Windows XP and Suse Linux 9.1/KDE 3.4 and I find that Linux is much, much faster to boot and run apps under Linux (even Windows apps via WINE) than under Windows.

This was true of my old motherboard, a dual Pentium III, and my new one, a Pentium 4 3.2E (Prescott core). Both configurations have 1GB of RAM and the Pentium 4 runs a stripped-down WinXP installation (no third-party desktop enhancements at all). Needless to say I don't boot to Windows much - only ~8 times so far this year. I do need to get around to reinstalling Flight Simulator and take a few flights one of these days, but I so dread booting to Windows that I haven't gotten around to it.
 
Old 05-25-2005, 09:53 AM   #22
PerfectReign
Member
 
Registered: Apr 2005
Location: Los Angeles
Distribution: openSUSE / Ubuntu
Posts: 294

Rep: Reputation: 33
Re: Is it me or Linux is slower than Windows...

Quote:
Originally posted by LegendBreath
Hi,
Is it just me or Windows is slower than Linux? I mean like in general task, Linux lag more than Windows... I have a AMD Sempron 2600+ with 512MB of RAM and a swap of 1GB with a ATI Radeon 9200 SE 128MB... Is there any distro of Linux that is faster than others or is there a difference between KDE and Gnome...
Its you.

Seriously, you should see linux faster than the bloated POS WinXP. I dual-boot SuSE 9.2 and Win2K and notice SuSE much faster, though it takes forever to boot. (I run Apache, MySQL, NTD, Postfix and a few other services I probably shouldn't.)

First off, I think its been mentioned, check your DMA settings. This will speed things up tremendously.

Second, make sure you're not running any wierd or unneeded processes. For example, if you send mail through your ISP, turn off any mail servers.

Third, that swap space seems a bit large. I dunno, though.

Fourth, check which theme you're using. Some of the themes are really heavy on the eye candy and slow the system down a bit. I use thin keramic... http://www.perfectreign.com/stuff/mplayer_blue.jpg (That's from a screen shot last month of a question about capturing Quicktime screens, hence the blue in the browser.)


As for KDE vs. Gnome, I don't know. Gnome I've heard is a bit faster than KDE but it is ugly as heck. Therefore I don't use it.

KDE 4.x is supposed to be way faster than 3.x is. You
 
Old 05-25-2005, 10:10 AM   #23
stefandwebb
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: May 2005
Posts: 4

Rep: Reputation: 0
One thing which worked for me (with Suse 9.3) is typing the following into the shell,

1. su
2. hdparm -d1 /dev/dma

This will enable DMA for your harddrive, which wasn't set up by default on my installation, and perhaps on your too if it's Suse.
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
linux is slower than microsoft windows thing0 Linux - Newbie 40 05-08-2005 07:00 AM
Why Linux is slower than Windows Almazick General 20 09-24-2004 06:13 PM
Internet Slower in Linux than Windows njbrain Linux - Networking 18 04-29-2004 01:12 PM
Linux slower than Windows? fedivh Linux - General 22 12-22-2003 11:31 PM
Linux slower than Windows NT plisken Linux - Networking 5 04-07-2002 06:26 AM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Software

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:28 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration